テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.2万 件）
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive Perl security covering taint mode, input validation, safe process execution, DBI parameterized queries, web security (XSS/SQLi/CSRF), and perlcritic security policies. Use when reviewing Perl input handling, process execution, DBI queries, or web-facing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Local-evidence production readiness audit for shipped apps, pre-launch reviews, post-merge checks, and "what breaks in prod?" questions without sending repo data to an external audit service. Use when auditing production readiness before launch, after a merge, or when asked what breaks in prod.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Split an RFC into a multi-agent execution DAG — decompose into work units with dependencies and acceptance tests, run research, plan, implement, test, and review per unit, then merge through a queue with re-based branches and final system verification. Use when a feature is too large for a single agent pass, orchestrating RFC-driven multi-agent execution, or managing merge queues across agent-built units.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control and non-conformance management for regulated manufacturing (FDA 21 CFR 820, IATF 16949, AS9100): NCR lifecycle and disposition, 5-Why/Ishikawa/fault-tree/8D root cause analysis, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, AQL sampling, and supplier quality audits. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology. Use when writing Rust tests — unit, integration, async, property-based, or coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit. Use when repo-scan must be installed before running its cross-stack source-code asset audit; this ECC pointer does not perform the audit itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Laravel testing strategies with PHPUnit, Pest, model factories, HTTP tests, Sanctum authentication testing, mocking, and coverage. Use when writing Laravel tests with PHPUnit or Pest, or driving a Laravel feature test-first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kotlin testing patterns with Kotest, MockK, coroutine testing, property-based testing, and Kover coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Kotlin practices. Use when writing Kotlin tests with Kotest or MockK, or testing coroutines and checking coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate fixing a bug — reproduce it as a failing regression test, fix to green, review, and gated commit — by delegating each phase to the matching ECC agent. Use when existing behavior is broken or wrong.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness. Use when verifying a Laravel project before merge or deploy — lint, static analysis, tests, coverage, security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ktor server patterns including routing DSL, plugins, authentication, Koin DI, kotlinx.serialization, WebSockets, and testApplication testing. Use when building a Ktor server — routing, plugins, auth, DI, serialization, or tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security patterns for autonomous trading agents with wallet or transaction authority. Covers prompt injection, spend limits, pre-send simulation, circuit breakers, MEV protection, and key handling. Use when an autonomous agent holds wallet or transaction authority and its limits, simulation, or key handling need review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Laravel security best practices — authentication, authorization, Eloquent safety, CSRF, XSS prevention, API security, and secure deployment configurations. Use when reviewing Laravel auth, Eloquent safety, CSRF, XSS, API security, or deployment configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment checks for router and switch configuration, including dangerous commands, duplicate addresses, subnet overlaps, stale references, management-plane risk, and IOS-style security hygiene. Use when reviewing a router or switch configuration before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate altering an existing, working feature to new desired behavior — update its tests to the new spec, change the implementation to match, review, and gated commit. Use when behavior is not broken but should be different.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices. Use when writing Go tests — table-driven cases, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, or coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
F# testing patterns with xUnit, FsUnit, Unquote, FsCheck property-based testing, integration tests, and test organization best practices. Use when writing F# tests with xUnit, FsUnit, Unquote, or FsCheck.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JPA/Hibernate patterns for entity design, relationships, query optimization, transactions, auditing, indexing, pagination, and pooling in Spring Boot. Use when designing JPA entities or relationships, or when a Hibernate query, transaction, or N+1 problem needs fixing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kotlin Coroutines and Flow patterns for Android and KMP — structured concurrency, Flow operators, StateFlow, error handling, and testing. Use when writing coroutines or Flow code on Android or KMP, or debugging cancellation and concurrency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FastAPI best practices covering project structure, Pydantic v2 schemas, dependency injection, async handlers, authentication, authorization, transactional service layers, and testing with httpx and pytest. Use when building or reviewing FastAPI apps — Pydantic schemas, dependencies, async handlers, auth, or tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn ambiguous or high-impact product and engineering changes into scoped, verifiable acceptance criteria before or alongside implementation. Use when a user asks to clarify a feature, define acceptance criteria, de-risk a security/data/migration/integration change, prepare implementation requirements for another agent, or make a complex request testable. Do not trigger for trivial edits, straightforward fixes, active debugging, code review, or implementation requests whose acceptance conditions are already clear unless the user explicitly invokes this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HIPAA-specific entrypoint for healthcare privacy and security work. Use when a task is explicitly framed around HIPAA, PHI handling, covered entities, BAAs, breach posture, or US healthcare compliance requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the full Django verification loop — environment check, mypy/ruff/black linting, migration safety, pytest with coverage targets, pip-audit and bandit security scans, settings and logging review, and diff review — producing a phased pass/fail report before release or PR. Use when preparing a Django pull request, validating migrations or coverage, or running pre-deploy readiness checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention, XSS prevention, and secure deployment configurations. Use when reviewing Django authentication, authorization, input handling, or deployment settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。