スキルを探す

A contract for what the agent does when a long, messy, stream-of-consciousness ramble arrives (usually voice dictation): act on nothing until the echo brief is approved. The echo audits the entire transfer, mission, locked decisions and constraints, open questions, flips and parked tangents, with the model's inferences and guesses quarantined away from the user's own phrasing, so the user verifies what the model believes, not just what it doubts. Use when the user says "let me think out loud" or wants to ramble a bit before building anything, when a message opens with a speech-to-text preamble like "switching to voice, sorry for typos", when input is a long weakly punctuated stream with restarts and mid-message reversals ("actually no, wait, scrap that idea entirely"), or when the user asks to be interviewed about a fuzzy half-formed idea. Includes an optional capture mode for rambles spread across several messages and an optional targeted interview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Beta readers for any draft, run by simulating how a real reader experiences it, moment by moment. A skim gate, a no-lookahead timed read producing an attention transcript with quit points, a recall test of what a reader remembers the next day, and a trust ledger of the implied author. Use when the user asks for a beta read, beta readers, test readers, human review, reader review, to read something like a human, to be a first reader, whether a piece holds attention or will actually get read, for a quick read of whether a busy skimmer would even open a post, what readers will remember or take away tomorrow, where readers stop reading or bounce, or why a draft still feels off or hollow after anti-slop or humanizer edits. Final gate before publishing; reports where the reading broke; never rewrites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find low-value or duplicate tests and the test-only code they keep alive. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit: supported static findings; qualified profiles add reproduction and repair candidates. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report browser/API/CLI/job/worker/webhook bugs. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release documentation audit. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix browser/API/CLI/job/worker/webhook bugs. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live developer experience audit. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live-device iOS QA for SwiftUI apps. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Browser Use Cloud payments with x402 — pay per request from a crypto wallet (USDC on Base mainnet), no signup or API key. Two setups it works out up front — "just use it" (set up a wallet so you or Claude Code can run cloud browser tasks paid from the wallet — Claude writes and runs throwaway scripts, nothing touches your codebase) or "build it in" (install the SDK and write the key + code into your project). Walks through wallet setup, funding, .env, and a ~$1 test run. Use when the user asks about x402, pay-per-use, USDC payments, or wants Browser Use Cloud without an API key. For the free-tier signup (reverse-CAPTCHA → API key), use `browser-use cloud signup` or the `cloud` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix bugs and small behavior changes at the narrowest responsible layer. Use when regression proof, preserved surrounding behavior, and task-relevant tests matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services. Use when auditing dependencies for known vulnerabilities, triaging package-manager audit findings, or assessing supply-chain risk in a new package. Use when personal data or privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA) is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests in real browsers via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data. Requires the chrome-devtools MCP server to be configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anti-AI-slop design skill for greenfield pages, audits, redesigns, and design extraction from URLs or screenshots. Use when the user asks to build a new app or landing page, wants to redesign something, invokes Hallmark by name, or uses audit/redesign/study.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author a long-running multi-file rewrite plan that subsequent patch-edit + diff-review + build-test stages will execute, with explicit ownership boundaries and patch-safety guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cloned or reimplemented websites for fidelity gaps, tracking scripts, source-brand and language residue, placeholders, and risky external dependencies. Use before handoff or deployment, or when asked to review a website clone for cleanup and readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。