Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
39 件(Dragoon0x のリポジトリ) ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a design system into its constituent decisions and evaluate each one. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating consistency, or understanding how a product maintains quality at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defend a design decision to skeptical stakeholders with structure and evidence. Use when presenting design work, writing design documentation, or pushing back on requests to change something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate and map the anatomy of any design. Identify visual hierarchy, spacing systems, color roles, and tension points through clinical analysis. Use when doing formal design audits, teaching design analysis, or building structured observation skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Study how products evolve over time using archived versions. The decisions that survive redesigns are the taste decisions. Use when understanding what's essential vs. cosmetic in a design, or learning from product evolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Precise language for design feedback. Ban vague words. Name what you actually see. Use when giving design feedback, running critiques, or training teams to communicate about quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured taste breakdowns of real products. The format for making taste observations legible and shareable. Use when analyzing products, writing case studies, documenting design observations, or teaching through example.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build taste through volume of output, deliberate failure, and speed. Taste cannot be developed by watching. It's sharpened by making, failing, and making again. Use when designing practice routines, breaking through creative blocks, or helping someone move from analysis to execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic design quality evaluation. Hierarchy, type, color, space, craft, system. Use when evaluating whether a design is ready to ship, running quality audits, or setting quality standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Task sequences, progressive disclosure, and the pacing of an experience over time. Use when designing multi-step flows, evaluating onboarding, or diagnosing why users get lost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use taste as a competitive moat and business advantage. In the AI and vibe-coding era, execution is commoditized. Taste is the defensible edge. Use when advising founders on product differentiation, building product culture, evaluating why some products win despite fewer features, or understanding taste as a strategic asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull design principles from architecture, fashion, film, industrial design, and physical spaces into screen-based design. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, expanding creative range, or building cross-disciplinary design vocabulary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Micro-decision analysis. Catalog the border radii, spacing scales, type sizes, and state coverage that most people miss. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating craft quality, or training granular perception.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。