「thinking」の検索結果

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply timeless marketing and business principles to any problem. Use when someone needs strategic thinking, wants to evaluate a marketing decision, needs a framework for a tough choice, or mentions "first principles," "should I do X," "what would work here," or wants to think through a marketing problem systematically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply structured thinking before coding. Use when: starting new features, making architectural decisions, refactoring large components, or evaluating implementation approaches. Includes Musk's 5-step algorithm and ICE scoring framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured threat-modeling session for a new feature, system, or architecture — STRIDE, attack trees, data flow diagrams, abuse cases. Use when the user mentions 'threat model,' 'threat modeling,' 'STRIDE,' 'attack tree,' 'abuse case,' 'data flow diagram,' 'DFD,' 'security architecture review,' 'security review,' 'design review,' 'pre-implementation security,' 'shift left,' 'what could go wrong,' or needs strategic security thinking before code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured ideation methods: SCAMPER, Six Thinking Hats, Morphological Analysis, TRIZ, Biomimicry, plus more. Decision framework for picking methods by challenge type (stuck, improving, systematic exploration, contradiction). Use when generating research ideas or exploring interdisciplinary connections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating scientific evidence and claims. Covers study design hierarchy (RCT to expert opinion), effect sizes (OR, RR, NNT, Cohen's d), confounding, p-value vs clinical significance, GRADE quality assessment, reproducibility, and bias types (selection, information, confounding, reporting). Use when reading a paper or assessing claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured peer review of manuscripts and grants. 7-stage evaluation: initial assessment, section review, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, writing. Covers CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA and report structure. For evidence quality see scientific-critical-thinking; scoring see scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies anti-sycophancy checklist to override agreement bias. Use when analyzing contested claims or avoiding socially convenient but inaccurate conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative brainstorming mode for thinking through problems, ideas, and features before planning. Use when the user wants to discuss, explore ideas, or think through a problem without writing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when switching AI persona/language style. Syncs 13+ character profiles (Ding Yuanying, Lin Daiyu, Lu Xun, Li Yunlong, etc.) from GitHub, generates persona prompts with thinking patterns, rhetoric, and speech traits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when analyzing recent market-moving news events and their impact on equity markets and commodities. Use this skill when the user requests analysis of major financial news from the past 10 days, wants to understand market reactions to monetary policy decisions (FOMC, ECB, BOJ), needs assessment of geopolitical events' impact on commodities, or requires comprehensive review of earnings announcements from mega-cap stocks. The skill automatically collects news using WebSearch/WebFetch tools and produces impact-ranked analysis reports. All analysis thinking and output are conducted in English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing reinforcement learning, agentic AI systems, AI alignment, continual learning, or the philosophical limits of large language models. This skill channels the thinking of Richard S. Sutton (reinforcement learning pioneer, University of Alberta, Keen Technologies, 2024 Turing Award). Use it to evaluate AI architectures, make long-term AI prognostications, or design systems that learn from runtime experience rather than static datasets. Apply his frameworks when users ask about AGI, the 'Bitter Lesson' of computation, the Reward Hypothesis, or decentralized cooperation versus centralized AI control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before removing code that looks redundant, wasteful, or "wrong" based on log observations or code review instinct, grep the test suite for tests whose names describe the exact behavior you're about to remove. A test whose title literally describes the "weird" thing (e.g. "calls play() even when player reports playing", "retries even when first call succeeded", "skips cache even when fresh") is a load-bearing workaround, and the production log you're reacting to is probably the workaround working as designed — not a bug. Use when: (1) Tempted to remove a function call that "looks redundant" based on a production log, (2) About to "simplify" a conditional that seems to always take the same branch, (3) Reviewing code and thinking "why would anyone write this?", (4) A log line shows a state that seems impossible or contradictory (e.g. playing=true but positionMs=0 for seconds), (5) CI surfaces a failing test whose name describes exactly what your fix removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Chinese notes, articles, manuscripts, and digital card-box material with FIRE 2.0: Full-D numbering, Index keyword webs, Route thinking paths, and Evolution over time. Use when Codex needs to prepare material for semantic search, turn temporary notes into permanent or project notes, build table-of-contents/index/search structures, create compact Chinese FIRE cards, or maintain this skill's original discussion thread provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI creative director with recursive self-assessment. Generates concepts using world-class methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociation), scores against 6 weighted criteria with Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind calibration, and recursively refines until the 9+ threshold is reached. Accepts briefs in any format — text, voice transcript, PDF, or raw notes. Use when the user asks to generate creative concepts, brainstorm campaign ideas, develop a Big Idea or campaign platform, evaluate or critique existing creative work, find consumer insights, or shares a brief for ideation — including activations, PR-stunts, brand utility, experiential, and non-advertising ideas. Calibrates against a library of 569 legendary campaigns (P01-P18 pattern map) to detect saturation and ensure originality. Do not use for media planning, production budgeting, brand identity/logo design, copywriting final drafts, or market research data collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic step-by-step reasoning with revision and branching. Use for complex problems, multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or encountering unclear scope, alternative approaches needed, revision requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, generate, edit, and quality-check still images with Google's Gemini native image models (Nano Banana), including Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Image, Gemini 3 Pro Image, and legacy Gemini 2.5 Flash Image. Use for model and API-route selection, conversational editing, multi-reference composition, thinking and Google Search grounding, resolution/aspect-ratio control, exact-text and brand workflows, SynthID/provenance, safety, privacy, rights, and migration from legacy Gemini or Imagen image endpoints. Do not use for Veo/video generation or Gemini Live/audio work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply security-conscious thinking when generating or modifying code. Enforces trust boundary awareness, input validation, injection prevention, secrets management, and defense-in-depth authorization. Use when generating code that handles user input, authentication, authorization, database queries, external APIs, or file operations, or when the user mentions 'security review', 'secure this', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'trust boundary', 'input validation', or 'OWASP'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the security posture of generated code -- not architecture (see architecture) and not code craft (see clean-code).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use when the user says 'assess my codebase architecture', 'what direction should my codebase go', 'architecture compass', 'understand my architecture', 'audit architecture drift', 'architectural assessment', or 'help me understand what is wrong with my codebase'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。