「lua」の検索結果

Azure AI Projects SDK for .NET. High-level client for Azure AI Foundry projects including agents, connections, datasets, deployments, evaluations, and indexes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Projects SDK for Java. High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry project management including connections, datasets, indexes, and evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Segment single cells from multiplexed IMC/MIBI tissue images using Mesmer/DeepCell, Cellpose, or ilastik+CellProfiler, covering whole-cell vs nuclear segmentation, the summed-membrane-channel decision, nuclear-expansion bias, lateral spillover, resolution-floor parameters, and downstream-proxy evaluation. Use when delineating cells after preprocessing, choosing a segmentation model, building a cell mask for quantification, diagnosing impossible double-positive populations, or troubleshooting over/under-segmentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns and QCs methylated-RNA-immunoprecipitation (MeRIP / m6A-seq) IP and input libraries using STAR or HISAT2 splice-aware mapping, samtools sort/index, IP/input matched-pair tracking, antibody-lot metadata recording, replicate concordance via deepTools multiBamSummary + plotCorrelation, IP enrichment QC via plotFingerprint and per-transcript IP/input ratio distributions, library-complexity saturation curves via PreSeq c_curve / lc_extrap, and the explicit do-NOT-deduplicate convention for standard non-UMI MeRIP. Use when preparing paired IP and input BAM files for exomePeak2 / MeTPeak / MACS3 peak calling, evaluating MeRIP replicate concordance and IP enrichment, deciding whether to deduplicate (standard MeRIP typically NOT — see Tips), choosing genome-vs-transcriptome alignment for downstream peak vs m6Anet workflows, recording antibody clone and lot metadata for downstream cross-batch reconciliation, detecting failed IPs via saturation curves and IP/input distribution shape, or generating IP-over-Input bigWig tracks for downstream visualisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build publication-quality figures in R with ggplot2 using the grammar of graphics (data + aesthetics + geometries + scales + facets + themes) with CVD-safe palettes, cairo_pdf TrueType embedding, programmatic aes via tidy evaluation, and the theme_classic publication baseline. Use when producing static figures in R for papers, presentations, or reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute genome-to-genome distances (ANI, AAI, dDDH, k-mer Mash) and assign taxonomic classifications using skani (Shaw 2023), FastANI (Jain 2018), pyani / pyANI ANIb / ANIm, OrthoANI (Lee 2016), AAI (amino-acid identity), dDDH via TYGS / GGDC, GTDB-Tk (Chaumeil 2020 standard prokaryote taxonomy), and Mash MinHash (Ondov 2016). Use when delineating prokaryote species (95% ANI threshold; Jain 2018 Nat Commun 9:5114), assigning genomes to GTDB taxonomy with ANI radius, computing genome similarity matrices for clustering, classifying archaea, evaluating MAG (metagenome-assembled genome) species assignment, applying skani for fast metagenomic ANI screening, or reconciling 16S rRNA-based taxonomy with whole-genome ANI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when selecting a TPR-registered Training Provider for behind-the-wheel ELDT training. Covers the registry, evaluation criteria, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to evaluate which defensive driving program is best for your fleet. Compares Smith System, CarriersEdge, Compass-native training, and other options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to evaluate document retention software options. Covers compliance features, ease of use, integration, and cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks how to build, measure, or improve safety culture in a motor carrier — leading vs lagging safety indicators, blame-free reporting, near-miss programs, safety committee structure, monthly safety meetings, ATA Safety Management Program guidance, and how to evaluate cultural maturity. Reference ATA SMP + DOT safety culture research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a carrier is evaluating ELD / telematics / dashcam platforms and needs an objective comparison of Samsara, Motive (formerly KeepTruckin), and Geotab. Covers ELD compliance, AI dashcams, driver scoring, integrations, pricing structure, and which fleet profile suits which platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about the financial differences between being an owner-operator vs company driver — gross pay, expenses, net pay, capital requirements, risk tolerance, lifestyle, and how to evaluate the path. Reference industry pay surveys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when selecting or replacing an ELD provider. Covers the FMCSA Registered ELD list, evaluation criteria, common provider removals from the registered list, and the 60-day transition rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to evaluate whether to switch from annual MVR pulls to continuous monitoring. Covers cost-benefit, intervention timing, and major providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about Household Goods (HHG) movers — 49 CFR 375 + 376 consumer protection rules, FMCSA HHG-specific authority, mover certification, binding vs non-binding estimates, dispute resolution, weight ticket requirements, valuation coverage, and how HHG operations differ from general freight. Cite 49 CFR 375.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。