459 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add or update a GEODE model or provider from current primary documentation and repository call-site evidence. Use for model IDs, context limits, pricing, reasoning controls, provider routes, capability gates, or fallback changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
担保管理专家。高效处理信用证开立与接收，严格审核资信及条款风险，全流程管控确保合规性，保障跨境贸易安全履约
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate staged or parallel jobs across coding-agent runtimes and subagents: routes by capability/risk, isolates writers in worktrees, arbitrates results. NOT for a single-agent task (mk:cook).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers - discover, analyze, and execute tools/prompts/resources from configured MCP servers. Use when working with MCP integrations, need to discover available MCP capabilities, filter MCP tools for specific tasks, execute MCP tools programmatically, access MCP prompts/resources, or implement MCP client functionality. Supports intelligent tool selection, multi-server management, and context-efficient capability discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantitative agent evaluation using 4-metric framework (correctness/step_ratio/tool_call_ratio/latency_ratio) with ideal trajectory annotation and capability-categorical taxonomy. Use when measuring agent efficiency, comparing agent variants, or gating new agents through correctness→efficiency phases. Complements harness-eval (SE benchmarks) and evaluator-optimizer (qualitative rubric).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide setup for and verify a reviewed, read-only Grafana Observability profile and its activated capability packs. Use when a user asks to set up Grafana access, verify profile readiness, discover available infrastructure, APM, log, IoT or business KPI packs, or troubleshoot why a Grafana pack cannot run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a known webpage or execute a discovered workflow or data-provider capability. Use for page content or structured results once the URL or tool is selected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Central catalog of available skills with metadata, capabilities, and performance history. Provides skill discovery and lookup services. Activate on 'skill registry', 'list skills', 'skill catalog', 'available skills', 'skill metadata'. NOT for matching skills to tasks (use dag-semantic-matcher) or ranking (use dag-capability-ranker).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The intelligence layer of WinDAGs. Decomposes natural language tasks into Hierarchical Task DAGs (HTDAGs), matches subtasks to skills, executes waves in parallel, and dynamically expands nodes when complexity exceeds executor capability. Use for 'orchestrate', 'execute DAG', 'parallel agents', 'decompose task', 'coordinate skills'. NOT for single-skill tasks or simple linear workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated discovery and matching of agent skills for dynamic task routing and capability assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to run a depth-bounded self-correction loop (attempt → critic verdict → re-attempt) as a tunable test-time compute knob — a do-and-judge specialisation, default off, capability-gated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the offline (jscpd) and online (scanoss-py) similarity scanners on demand against a diff or path — the ONLY home of this repo's detection capability; no CI gate exists or ever ran it automatically
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill before implementing a fix for a barrier that may originate in a shared component, design system, renderer, or external dependency rather than this project's own code. Decide whether the responsible fix is local, an existing installed capability, or an upstream contribution before writing a workaround. Absolutely always record any temporary local divergence with an owner and removal condition. Under no circumstances open, comment on, or submit anything in an external project without explicit human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[General] Use when you need to (re)generate a DERIVED navigation index, cross-capability ERD, or reimplementation guide assembled FROM the canonical Feature Specs under docs/specs/**. Never extracts a separate A-E engineering tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[AI & Tools] Use when you need to apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before building new infrastructure or a non-trivial capability, check whether the Nuxt ecosystem, UnJS, Vite, or other OSS already solves it — within our constraints (Nuxt, OSS, self-hostable, no mandatory SaaS). Use when weighing build-vs-adopt or starting new infra/tooling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to MEASURE this repo instead of eyeballing it — interpret the loop-station context-budget trend (history.jsonl, thresholds, the tokenizer-switch gotcha), read a session trace, use the eval ledger (cost-per-success), and pick the right evidence tool (app-shots, smoke-deployed, db-counts, --check modes). Use when asked "is the harness bloating", "how big is CLAUDE.md really", "did this agent run actually succeed", "prove this works", "what evidence do we have", or when tempted to declare a capability (browser, tool) unavailable. For RUNNING the loop-station scripts, defer to the loop-station skill — this skill is interpretation + the wider evidence toolkit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。