「layers」の検索結果

Architect scalable backend services using layered architecture, dependency injection, middleware patterns, service classes, and separation of concerns. Use when building API services, implementing business logic layers, creating service classes, setting up middleware chains, implementing dependency injection, designing controller-service-repository patterns, handling cross-cutting concerns, creating domain models, implementing CQRS patterns, or establishing backend architecture standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep inherited changes narrow, correctly marked, traceable, and easy to rebase across repository layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement sprite layers, overlays, render targets, shader prototypes, and visual cleanup without leaking gameplay authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement replicated appearance data, GenericVisualizer mappings, sprite layers, overlays, and client visual systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when implementing, refactoring, or extending the internal table runtime inside this repository. Covers the current architecture layers, state model, composable flow, where different responsibilities live, how to add features cleanly, and what kinds of refactors are encouraged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt generator for documenting end-to-end application workflows. Automatically detects project architecture patterns, technology stacks, and data flow patterns to generate detailed implementation blueprints covering entry points, service layers, data access, error handling, and testing approaches across multiple technologies including .NET, Java/Spring, React, and microservices architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates an integration testing plan for .NET data access artifacts during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL database migrations. Analyzes a single project to identify repositories, DAOs, and service layers that interact with the database, then produces a structured testing plan. Use when planning integration test coverage for a migrated project, identifying which data access methods need tests, or preparing for Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates integration test cases for .NET data access artifacts during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL database migrations. Generates DB-agnostic xUnit tests with deterministic seed data that validate behavior consistency across both database systems. Use when creating integration tests for a migrated project, generating test coverage for data access layers, or writing Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration validation tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate full-stack feature development across backend, frontend, and infrastructure layers with modern API-first approach:

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures CLI app layers. Command/handler/service separation, clig.dev principles, exit codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Base implementation skill for this repository across .NET/C#, backend APIs, database/ORM, frontend Vue/Quasar, and Rust with Clean Architecture rules. Use when the user asks to build features, fix bugs, refactor modules, or improve code-level performance, and use specialized skills as inheritance layers when available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and enforce privacy and data protection controls across application, API, and database layers. Use when tasks involve PII handling, retention/deletion policies, consent, data minimization, auditability, or compliance-oriented architecture changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deobfuscates malicious JavaScript code used in web-based attacks, phishing pages, and dropper scripts by reversing encoding layers, eval chains, string manipulation, and control flow obfuscation to reveal the original malicious logic. Activates for requests involving JavaScript malware analysis, script deobfuscation, web skimmer analysis, or obfuscated dropper investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the ATT&CK Navigator and attackcti Python library. The analyst queries STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, generates Navigator layer files for visualization, and compares defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Activates for requests involving APT TTP mapping, ATT&CK Navigator layers, threat actor profiling, or MITRE technique coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes CI/CD pipeline speed by implementing effective caching for dependencies, Docker layers, build outputs, and test results. Provides before/after performance metrics and best practices. Use for "CI caching", "pipeline optimization", "build speed", or "cache strategy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exploitation methodology across binary, kernel, filesystem, web, and container layers. Covers symbolic-link races (open/access/stat split), file-descriptor races, fopen/realpath traversal races, /proc and procfs races, FUSE-backed slow-fs races to widen the window, ptrace and signal races, kernel double-fetch / userspace pointer races, container/runc/symlink escape primitives, kubernetes admission/authz TOCTOU, web auth-vs-authz TOCTOU, JWT-claim TOCTOU at gateway vs service, payment/idempotency races, and modern race-amplification techniques (single-packet attack, slow loris, FUSE pause, cgroup freeze, scheduler shaping). Use when you've identified a 'check then act' pattern in code, when fuzzing for race conditions, or when exploiting concurrency bugs in privileged binaries / kernel / orchestrators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book. NOT for server-side rate limiting, bulkhead isolation, backpressure protocols, or database-specific retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。