455 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Adding a file type or upgrading any of its capability slots in the files feature (preview, edit, thumbnail, grid card, info, share, versions, conversion, diff, rail panel). Use when supporting a new extension or MIME type, building a previewer, touching FILE_TYPES, PreviewKind, FilePreview.tsx, EDITABLE_KINDS, or surfaces/single-file/, or working the FILE_SURFACES.md wishlist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Doctrine for adding a capability INTO a live, existing feature to a world-class bar. Use on 'add X to Y', 'extend Y to support X', a new option, button, setting, endpoint, or tool for Y, or a sub-feature spec to implement. NOT for whole-feature audits or overhauls (use feature-deep-dive).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: User wants to run Archon workflows, CREATE workflows or commands, set up Archon, or manage Archon configuration. Triggers (run): "use archon to", "run archon", "archon workflow", "use archon for", "have archon", "let archon", "ask archon to". Triggers (create): "create a workflow", "write a workflow", "make a command", "author a workflow", "new workflow", "new command", "archon workflow yaml". Triggers (setup): "set up archon", "install archon", "how to use archon", "configure archon", "archon setup", "get started with archon". Triggers (config): "change my archon config", "modify archon config", "archon config", "change archon settings", "update my config", "help me change my config", "edit archon config", "archon configuration". Triggers (init): "initialize archon", "set up .archon", "archon init", "add archon to repo". Capability: Runs AI workflows in isolated git worktrees for parallel development. Also: Creates and manages workflow YAML files, command files, and configuration. NOT for: Direct Claude Code work - only for delegating to Archon CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replicate and validate a GitHub issue by spinning up Archon, analyzing the issue, and systematically testing all described symptoms using browser automation. Use when: User wants to reproduce a bug, validate a GitHub issue, confirm a reported problem, or investigate whether an issue is real before working on a fix. Triggers: "replicate issue", "reproduce issue", "validate issue", "confirm bug", "test issue", "can you reproduce", "try to replicate", "verify the bug". Capability: Checks out main, pulls latest, starts Archon, reads the GitHub issue, then uses agent-browser to systematically test every symptom and produce a findings report. NOT for: Fixing issues (use /archon or /exp-piv-loop:fix-issue), general UI testing (use /validate-ui).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive end-to-end validation of the Archon Web UI using browser automation and codebase review. Use when: User wants to validate, test, or audit the Archon web interface, find UI/UX bugs, test workflow management, verify parallel agent orchestration, or run comprehensive browser-based E2E tests. Triggers: "validate ui", "test the ui", "e2e test", "browser test", "validate archon", "test archon ui", "ui audit", "ux review", "comprehensive test", "validate everything". Capability: Starts Archon, runs exhaustive browser automation tests via agent-browser CLI, performs codebase review, and produces a detailed bug/UX report. NOT for: Unit tests (use `bun test`), CLI-only validation (use /validation:validate-simple).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Workforce Orchestration: Hybrid Human+AI Teams. Build agent-led workforce orchestration: capability matching, escrow-based payments for AI agents and human gig workers, unified reputation scoring, SLA enforcement, dispute resolution, and compliance reporting. Includes detailed Python code examples for every pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when (1) building an AI agent that needs to communicate with other agents over the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol, (2) publishing an AgentCard for discovery, (3) acting as an A2A client or server, or (4) integrating A2A capabilities into an existing agent framework. Solves agent isolation — enabling discovery, capability negotiation, task delegation, and structured data exchange across different frameworks and vendors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after building a feature — explore it in a real browser to find what nobody predicted, then turn each finding into a deterministic test that guards it forever. Covers the agentic pass, what to generate vs hand-write, and how to skip honestly when a capability is missing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform direct, bounded browser inspection through the `browser.qa` capability when the user requests runtime UI evidence or one browser-specific claim needs DOM/accessibility/console/network/visual verification; do not trigger for every UI change, backend work, delegated QA, or durable E2E artifact routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Container escape and breakout techniques targeting Docker, containerd, and Podman runtimes. Covers privileged container breakout via host filesystem mount and nsenter, Docker socket abuse through /var/run/docker.sock, Linux capability exploitation including CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_PTRACE, and CAP_NET_ADMIN, cgroup v1 notify_on_release escape, runc CVEs such as CVE-2019-5736 and CVE-2024-21626 Leaky Vessels, kernel exploits from within containers, and Dockerfile misconfigurations like --privileged and host namespace sharing. Includes enumeration with capsh, amicontained, deepce, CDK, and nsenter. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1611 Escape to Host. Use this skill when the engagement scope includes container breakout, Docker escape, container privilege escalation, host access from container, or when you land inside a containerized environment and need to reach the underlying host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Central catalog of available skills with metadata, capabilities, and performance history. Provides skill discovery and lookup services. Activate on 'skill registry', 'list skills', 'skill catalog', 'available skills', 'skill metadata'. NOT for matching skills to tasks (use dag-semantic-matcher) or ranking (use dag-capability-ranker).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated discovery and matching of agent skills for dynamic task routing and capability assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。