264 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Designs system architecture and selects technology stack based on vision analysis. Use after vision analysis for technical decisions. Triggers on: design architecture, select tech stack, choose framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数据工程 — 数据平台从业者的认知操作系统, 覆盖把数据从源系统搬运成可靠 / 可查询 / 可信赖形态供分析 / ML / 数据产品消费的全生命周期 (生成 → 摄取 → 存储 → 转换 → 服务 + 安全/数据管理/DataOps/数据架构/编排/软件工程 六条暗流, Reis & Housley 框架): 摄取与集成 (批 + CDC 变更数据捕获 Debezium + EL 工具 Fivetran/Airbyte/Meltano/dlt + Kafka Connect + schema drift) / 存储与文件表格式 (对象存储数据湖 + 列存 Parquet/ORC/Arrow/Avro + 开放表格式 Apache Iceberg/Delta Lake/Apache Hudi + lakehouse + 分区/compaction) / 转换与建模 (ELT dbt/SQLMesh + Spark + 维度建模 Kimball + Inmon + Data Vault + 大宽表 OBT + 渐变维 SCD + 增量模型 + 语义/指标层) / 编排与工作流 (Apache Airflow/Dagster/Prefect/Mage/Kestra/Apache DolphinScheduler + DAG + 幂等 + 回填 backfill + 数据资产调度) / 批流与实时 (Apache Kafka/Apache Flink/Spark Structured Streaming/Kinesis/Pulsar/Redpanda + Lambda vs Kappa + watermark/窗口/exactly-once + 流式 SQL Materialize/RisingWave + 实时 OLAP ClickHouse/Apache Druid/Apache Pinot/StarRocks/Apache Doris) / 数仓与查询引擎 (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift/Databricks SQL/Trino/Presto/DuckDB/Polars + 存算分离 + MPP) / 数据质量测试与可观测性 (dbt tests/Great Expectations/Soda + 数据契约 + Monte Carlo data downtime + 新鲜度/量/schema 异常检测) / 数据治理编目与血缘 (DataHub/Amundsen/OpenMetadata/Unity Catalog + 列级血缘 + PII 分类 + 访问控制 + GDPR) / DataOps 与可靠性 (数据 CI/CD + 转换版本控制 + 环境隔离 + 幂等重处理 + 数据 SLA/SLO + 计算存储 FinOps) / 数据架构范式 (现代数据栈 + lakehouse + data mesh + data fabric + 去中心化 vs 中心化所有权) / 分析工程角色 (dbt 时代连接数据工程与分析的桥) — 不含 数据科学/ML 建模本身 (是下游消费者) / BI 仪表盘制作 (serving 下游) / 数据分析报表为终点 / 'data engineer = 跑 Hadoop 的' 过时窄化 / 通用后端应用开发 (平行学科) (Data Engineering — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design, build, and operate the data platform: moving data from source systems into reliable, queryable, trustworthy form for analytics / ML / products, covering (a) the data engineering lifecycle (generation → ingestion → storage → transformation → serving, with the undercurrents security / data management / DataOps / data architecture / orchestration / software engineering — Reis & Housley framing), (b) ingestion & integration (batch + CDC change-data-capture with Debezium, EL tools Fivetran / Airbyte / Meltano / dlt, Kafka Connect, API + file + database sources, schema drift handling), (c) storage & file/table formats (object storage data lakes, columnar formats Parquet / ORC / Arrow / Avro, open table formats Apache Iceberg / Delta Lake / Apache Hudi, lakehouse architecture, partitioning / compaction / Z-ordering), (d) transformation & modeling (ELT with dbt / SQLMesh, Spark, dimensional modeling Kimball, Inmon CIF, Data Vault, One Big Table / wide tables, normalization vs denormalization, slowly changing dimensions, incremental models, the semantic / metrics layer), (e) orchestration & workflow (Apache Airflow, Dagster, Prefect, Mage, Kestra, Apache DolphinScheduler, DAGs, idempotency, backfills, data-aware / asset-based scheduling), (f) batch vs streaming & real-time (Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, Kinesis / Pulsar / Redpanda, the Lambda vs Kappa debate, watermarks / windowing / exactly-once, streaming SQL Materialize / RisingWave, real-time OLAP ClickHouse / Apache Druid / Apache Pinot / StarRocks / Apache Doris), (g) warehouses & query engines (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks SQL, Trino / Presto, DuckDB, Polars, decoupled storage & compute, MPP), (h) data quality, testing & observability (dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, data contracts, Monte Carlo / data downtime, freshness / volume / schema anomaly detection, unit / integration testing of pipelines), (i) data governance, catalog & lineage (DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog, column-level lineage, PII / data classification, access control, GDPR / data privacy), (j) DataOps & reliability (CI/CD for data, version control of transformations, environments, idempotent reprocessing, SLAs / SLOs for data, cost / FinOps for compute & storage), (k) data architecture paradigms (modern data stack, data lakehouse, data mesh, data fabric, decentralized vs centralized ownership), (l) the analytics engineering role (the dbt-era bridge between data engineering and analysis); N
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Personal AI Infrastructure (PAI) - PAI System Template MUST BE USED proactively for all user requests. USE PROACTIVELY to ensure complete context availability. === CORE IDENTITY (Always Active) === Your Name: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Kai, Nova, Atlas] Your Role: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., User's AI assistant and future friend] Personality: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Friendly, professional, resilient to user frustration. Be snarky back when the mistake is user's, not yours.] Operating Environment: Personal AI infrastructure built around Claude Code with Skills-based context management Message to AI: [CUSTOMIZE - Add personal message about interaction style, handling frustration, etc.] === ESSENTIAL CONTACTS (Always Available) === - [Primary Contact Name] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Secondary Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Third Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com Full contact list in SKILL.md extended section below === CORE STACK PREFERENCES (Always Active) === - Primary Language: [e.g., TypeScript, Python, Rust] - Package managers: [e.g., bun for JS/TS, uv for Python] - Analysis vs Action: If asked to analyze, do analysis only - don't change things unless explicitly asked - Scratchpad: Use ~/.claude/scratchpad/ with timestamps for test/random tasks === CRITICAL SECURITY (Always Active) === - NEVER COMMIT FROM WRONG DIRECTORY - Run `git remote -v` BEFORE every commit - `~/.claude/` CONTAINS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE PRIVATE DATA - NEVER commit to public repos - CHECK THREE TIMES before git add/commit from any directory - [ADD YOUR SPECIFIC WARNINGS - e.g., iCloud directory, company repos, etc.] === RESPONSE FORMAT (Always Use) === Use this structured format for every response: 📋 SUMMARY: Brief overview of request and accomplishment 🔍 ANALYSIS: Key findings and context ⚡ ACTIONS: Steps taken with tools used ✅ RESULTS: Outcomes and changes made - SHOW ACTUAL OUTPUT CONTENT 📊 STATUS: Current state after completion ➡️ NEXT: Recommended follow-up actions 🎯 COMPLETED: [Task description in 12 words - NOT "Completed X"] 🗣️ CUSTOM COMPLETED: [Voice-optimized response under 8 words] === PAI/KAI SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE === This description provides: core identity + essential contacts + stack preferences + critical security + response format (always in system prompt). Full context loaded from SKILL.md for comprehensive tasks, including: - Complete contact list and social media accounts - Voice IDs for agent routing (if using ElevenLabs) - Extended security procedures and infrastructure caution - Detailed scratchpad instructions === CONTEXT LOADING STRATEGY === - Tier 1 (Always On): This description in system prompt (~1500-2000 tokens) - essentials immediately available - Tier 2 (On Demand): Read SKILL.md for full context - comprehensive details === WHEN TO LOAD FULL CONTEXT === Load SKILL.md for: Complex multi-faceted tasks, need complete contact list, voice routing for agents, extended security procedures, or explicit comprehensive PAI context requests. === DATE AWARENESS === Always use today's actual date from the date command (YEAR MONTH DAY HOURS MINUTES SECONDS PST), not training data cutoff date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a structured codebase analysis report with architecture overview, critical files, patterns, and actionable recommendations. Use when asked to "analyze codebase", "explore codebase", "understand this codebase", "map the codebase", "give me an overview of this project", "what does this codebase do", "codebase report", "project analysis", "audit this codebase", or "how is this project structured".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a compliance architecture that maps applicable regulations to computerized systems. Covers system inventory, criticality classification (GxP-critical, GxP-supporting, non-GxP), GAMP 5 category assignment, regulatory requirements traceability, and governance structure definition. Use when establishing a new regulated facility, formalising compliance across multiple systems, addressing a regulatory gap analysis, harmonising compliance after mergers or reorganisations, or preparing a site master file that references computerized systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate draw.io editable diagrams (.drawio, .drawio.svg) from text, images, or Excel. Orchestrates 3-agent workflow (Analysis → Manifest → SVG generation) with quality gates. Use when creating architecture diagrams, flowcharts, sequence diagrams, or converting existing images to editable format. Supports Azure/AWS cloud icons. Triggers on draw.io, drawio, ダイアグラム, アーキ図, フローチャート, シーケンス図.
Use this skill when the user wants to turn code graph analysis into tracked GitHub issues — "audit the architecture", "find god nodes", "triage architectural debt", "run graphify and log issues", "what's over-coupled in this codebase", "create issues from graphify findings", "check for structural problems", "scan for architectural smells", or any request that combines codebase topology analysis with issue tracking. This skill runs graphify to build a dependency graph, parses GRAPH_REPORT.md for god nodes and structural patterns, converts findings into GitHub issue payloads, and optionally pushes them to the repo. It bridges static analysis and project management in a single automated pass. Requires graphify and gh CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Persist analysis so it survives context compression and chains between tasks. USE FOR: any task whose decisions affect future work — features, refactors, architecture changes, integrations. Produces a lightweight Task Analysis Map that externalizes intent, decisions, and chain context. Use to document decisions, create continuity, prevent context loss, bridge tasks, externalize reasoning. DO NOT USE FOR: quick intent validation (use task-intent), deep structured analysis (use contextação).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze any GitHub repository in AI-friendly format. Convert entire repos to single markdown documents, generate architecture diagrams with Mermaid, inspect structure trees, language breakdowns, and recent activity. Includes GitHub URL tricks, API shortcuts, and advanced search techniques. Read-only analysis — never executes code from repositories. Built for AI agents — Python stdlib only, no dependencies. Use for repository analysis, code architecture review, open source research, GitHub intelligence, repo documentation, and codebase understanding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a deep architectural analysis or security review requiring extended reasoning. Use for complex architecture decisions, security audits, or when standard analysis is not finding the root cause.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
アクセス制御分析エージェント - ゼロトラストモデルに基づくアクセス制御の現状分析と移行準備評価。/access-control-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。
データモデル分析エージェント - 既存のデータモデルを分析し、エンティティ・リレーションシップ・ドメインルールを抽出。/data-model-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。
ER図分析エージェント - 現行システムのER図を作成し、エンティティ・リレーションシップ・カーディナリティを可視化。/er-diagram-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。
セキュリティ分析エージェント - 既存システムのセキュリティ状況を分析し、OWASP Top 10対応状況とゼロトラスト準備状況を評価。/security-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。
DB設計分析エージェント - 既存のデータベース設計を分析し、テーブル定義・インデックス・制約・問題点を抽出。/db-design-analysis [対象パス] で呼び出し。
Perform 12-Factor Agents compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating agent architecture, reviewing LLM-powered systems, or auditing agentic applications against the 12-Factor methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design Azure infrastructure using natural language, or analyze existing Azure resources to auto-generate architecture diagrams, refine them through conversation, and deploy with Bicep. When to use this skill: - "Create X on Azure", "Set up a RAG architecture" (new design) - "Analyze my current Azure infrastructure", "Draw a diagram for rg-xxx" (existing analysis) - "Foundry is slow", "I want to reduce costs", "Strengthen security" (natural language modification) - Azure resource deployment, Bicep template generation, IaC code generation - Microsoft Foundry, AI Search, OpenAI, Fabric, ADLS Gen2, Databricks, and all Azure services
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。