「code models」の検索結果

Build with Mistral's Codestral code models — efficient open code generation with fill-in-the-middle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Meta's Code Llama — open code models for generation, infilling, and long-context code tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orientation for custom (non-OpenAI) models running in the Codex app through the codex-router proxy. Explains that the app's native tools arrive as flattened codex_app__ and mcp__ names, that the router restores them so the app executes them, which companion skills to read before threads, browser, or computer-use work, and that a turn with no tool call ends the task. Use when the session uses a custom (non-OpenAI) model, for example deepseek-v4-flash or mimo-v2.5, when codex_app__ or mcp__ tool names appear in the tool list, when a tool result just arrived and more work remains, or when thread, browser, or computer-use work is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

大規模言語モデルの知識・推論・コード生成を共通の課題で評価するスキル。複数モデルの比較表や学習途中の成績推移を作り、評価結果と個別の回答を保存します。

• MMLU・GSM8Kでのモデル評価
• 複数モデルの比較表作成
• 学習途中のモデルの成績追跡

Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects to and performs inference with Google Cloud Agent Platform GenAI models, including First-Party Gemini models and Third-Party OpenMaaS models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc.). Use when asked to perform inference, ask a model a question, run a test prompt, execute chat completions, or generate code for calling Gemini or OpenMaaS models, authenticate with GenAI SDK, OpenAI SDK, or legacy Agent Platform SDK, configure base URLs and global/regional endpoints, or troubleshoot 429 Resource Exhausted (DSQ), 400 User Validation, or 404 Not Found errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Ruby and Rails code in DHH's distinctive 37signals style. Use this skill when writing Ruby code, Rails applications, creating models, controllers, or any Ruby file. Triggers on Ruby/Rails code generation, refactoring requests, code review, or when the user mentions DHH, 37signals, Basecamp, HEY, or Campfire style. Embodies REST purity, fat models, thin controllers, Current attributes, Hotwire patterns, and the "clarity over cleverness" philosophy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides Qwen Coder CLI delegation workflows for coding tasks using Qwen2.5-Coder and QwQ models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Qwen for tasks such as code generation, refactoring, debugging, or architectural analysis. Triggers on "use qwen", "use qwen coder", "delegate to qwen", "ask qwen", "second opinion from qwen", "qwen opinion", "continue with qwen", "qwen session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security vulnerabilities in AI-generated code and LLM applications, covering OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, secure coding patterns, and AI-specific threat modelsUse when "ai code security, llm vulnerabilities, ai generated code review, owasp llm, secure ai development, security, ai, llm, owasp, code-review, vulnerabilities" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey existing forecasting code or models in a codebase — find gaps, stale models, and missing validation. Use when asked "what forecasting models do we have", "audit our forecasts", or "find stale models".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List configured models, guide provider setup, verify local Kimi companion readiness, and manage the PreToolUse hook plus optional review gate. Use when asked about available models, subscription/API-key setup, default selection, or explicitly requested to install, check, enable, disable, or uninstall the integration. Codex and Claude Code share one ~/.kimi-code/config.toml but each own a host-scoped block, so $kimi-setup here does not disturb Claude Code's /kimi:setup (and vice-versa).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a user through connecting the judge models this plugin can use — Codex, OpenCode, OpenRouter (or any compatible endpoint: 9router, z.ai, Moonshot), Gemini — and through picking models, including "research current models for me". Use for "multi setup", "set up multi", "configure judges/reviewers/ backends", "connect 9router", "change/pick models", "onboarding", or whenever a probe shows missing backends and the user needs to know what to do about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review by several models at once — Claude sub-agents, OpenAI Codex, and a cheap third reviewer via OpenCode — reconciled into one report. Reviews whatever is named: a diff, a branch, specific files, one function, a legacy module, a whole repo. Use for any review request, a second or third opinion, a cross-check before a PR, or "code-review", "multi", "consensus review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects to and performs inference with Google Cloud Agent Platform GenAI models, including First-Party Gemini models and Third-Party OpenMaaS models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc.). Use when asked to perform inference, ask a model a question, run a test prompt, execute chat completions, or generate code for calling Gemini or OpenMaaS models, authenticate with GenAI SDK, OpenAI SDK, or legacy Agent Platform SDK, configure base URLs and global/regional endpoints, or troubleshoot 429 Resource Exhausted (DSQ), 400 User Validation, or 404 Not Found errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIによる開発の成功条件を実装前に定義し、コード・ルール・モデル・人の評価で新機能と既存機能を確認しながら、複数回の試行から信頼性を記録するスキル。

• AI実装前に成功条件を決めたいとき
• プロンプトやエージェント変更後の回帰確認
• 複数回の試行で信頼性を測りたいとき

言語モデル内部の反応を少数の特徴に分解し、学習した概念を調べます。学習済みSAEの分析、自作SAEの訓練、特徴を使った出力調整と品質評価を案内します。

• 学習済みSAEで特徴を調べたいとき
• 特定のモデル層にSAEを訓練する
• 入力文ごとの特徴の反応を比較する

Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guarantee valid JSON/XML/code structure during generation, use Pydantic models for type-safe outputs, support local models (Transformers, vLLM), and maximize inference speed with Outlines - dottxt.ai's structured generation library

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for training and analyzing Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) using SAELens to decompose neural network activations into interpretable features. Use when discovering interpretable features, analyzing superposition, or studying monosemantic representations in language models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。