「codebase analysis」の検索結果

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using agent teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a structured codebase analysis report with architecture overview, critical files, patterns, and actionable recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using Agent Teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to auto-detect workflows, data pipelines, and file dependencies using putior's put_auto() engine. Produces an annotation plan that maps detected I/O patterns to source files across 30+ supported languages with 902 auto-detection patterns. Use when onboarding onto an unfamiliar codebase to understand data flow, starting putior integration in a project without existing annotations, auditing a project's data pipeline before documentation, or preparing an annotation plan before running annotate-source-files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze codebases using a graph database instead of reading source files. Use when understanding code architecture, finding functions or call patterns, tracing data flow, checking dependencies, or answering "where is X used?" questions. Grafema builds a queryable code graph from static analysis — prefer querying the graph over reading files manually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package entire code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix. Capabilities include pack codebases with customizable include/exclude patterns, generate multiple output formats (XML, Markdown, plain text), preserve file structure and context, optimize for AI consumption with token counting, filter by file types and directories, add custom headers and summaries. Use when packaging codebases for AI analysis, creating repository snapshots for LLM context, analyzing third-party libraries, preparing for security audits, generating documentation context, or evaluating unfamiliar codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase skill for planning and executing large-scale codebase migrations using full-context AI analysis. Produces an impact map, ordered batch plan, subagent execution protocol, and cross-codebase validation pass. Optimized for Fable 5's 1M-token context window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a project has no docs/ directory or needs initial documentation generated from codebase analysis. Triggers on "init docs", "create documentation", "generate docs", "docs init", or when docs/ is empty. Do NOT use for updating existing docs (use mk:document-release).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-pass codebase audit — orchestrates project-analysis-core plus the framework-specific project-analysis-*; explicit request only. Single-pass scan → project-analyzer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when picking which analysis or project-analysis-* skill fits a request — routes by scope, framework, and symptom — even if the user just says 'analyze this' or 'dig into the codebase'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect codebases w/ pygount: LOC, languages, ratios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze any codebase's source code in depth and produce structured analysis documents saved as markdown files. Use this skill whenever the user asks to understand how a codebase works — architecture, module design, call flows, data models, design patterns, performance characteristics, or any implementation detail. Trigger on phrases like "analyze the source", "explain this code", "how does X work", "where is Y implemented", "trace the flow of", "what happens when", "read through the code", "code walkthrough", "源码分析", "代码解读", "实现原理", "架构分析", "调用链路", "模块分析", or any code-exploration request. Works with any programming language: TypeScript/JavaScript, Java, Python, Go, Rust, C/C++, and more. Even if the user's question seems simple (e.g., "这个文件是干什么的"), use this skill — a thorough, source-backed analysis document is always more valuable than a surface-level guess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, confidence scoring, and command validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP server for codebase architecture, request tracing, dependency analysis, and impact analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-turn iterative deep research on specific topics within a codebase with zero tolerance for shallow analysis. Use when the user wants an in-depth investigation, needs to understand how something works across multiple files, or asks for comprehensive analysis of a specific system or pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate, modernize, and upgrade codebases to AWS. Run analysis on repos for tech debt, security vulnerabilities, and modernization opportunities. Transforms .NET Framework to .NET 8/10, mainframe COBOL to Java, VMware VMs to EC2, SQL Server to Aurora, and upgrades Java/Python/Node.js versions and AWS SDKs. Use when the user says "migrate .NET to AWS", "upgrade Java to 17/21", "modernize COBOL", "modernize mainframe", "move VMware to EC2", "convert SQL Server to Aurora", "upgrade Python version", "migrate AWS SDK", "transform this codebase", "analyze for issues", "find tech debt", "what tech debt", "security vulnerabilities", "CVEs", "what's wrong with my code", "assess my repos", "where do I start", "find what's outdated", "analyze my repos", "AWS Transform - continuous modernization", "continuous modernization" or "continuous-modernization". Don't use for infrastructure provisioning, CI/CD pipelines, or general coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive codebase analysis covering architecture, code quality, security, performance, testing, and maintainability. Use when user wants to audit code quality, identify technical debt, find security issues, assess test coverage, or get a codebase health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。