「constitution」の検索結果

archive ステップ完了後に Lessons を分析し constitution.md への追加提案を生成するサブエージェント

Orchestrator for spec-driven development (SDD) — the discipline of writing executable specs before code, with a constitution above them and a hard cross-check gate before implementation. Mirrors GitHub Spec Kit / AWS Kiro slash-command shape. Routes /constitution, /specify, /clarify, /plan, /tasks, /analyze, /implement to the right leaf skill. Load when the user says "spec-driven development", "SDD", "specs-first workflow", "run the spec loop", "/specify a feature", "/plan from this spec", "do spec-driven for this", "GitHub Spec Kit workflow", "Kiro workflow", or invokes any SDD-style slash command. Single entry point for all SDD workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

長期プロジェクトの既存文書を、規則・構造・現状・履歴の役割に整理します。エージェントの参照先と更新ルールを整え、文書のずれや削除したものの再作成を防ぐ運用を支援します。

• 散在するプロジェクト文書を整理したいとき
• セッション間で文脈を引き継ぎたいとき
• 意図的に削除した理由を残したいとき

Dual-context skill: Personal TELOS reads and updates goals, beliefs, narratives, strategies, and more with timestamped backups; Project TELOS analyzes .md/.csv directories for dependency chains, bottlenecks, and alignment, generating reports, narrative points, or dashboards. USE WHEN Telos, life goals, projects, dependencies, update TELOS, narrative points, McKinsey report, dashboard, what am I wrong about, life frames, mental models. NOT FOR conversational constitutional review (use Interview).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-grounded context refresh: reads constitutional files, TELOS, and CURRENT_STATE/IDEAL_STATE dimension files via TelosFreshness, pulls observed data (Oura sleep/HRV, Conduit app-time, work registry, git, expenses via StateEvidence), and drives a peer conversation that opens with claim-vs-evidence contradictions, drafts corrections for ratification, and closes with a ComputeGap-grounded ideal-state review. Routes to ContextCheckin; Phase0Setup on fresh install. USE WHEN /interview, resume interview, context check-in, telos check-in, what's stale, stale data, freshness check, update current state, update my current state, state sync, statusline says interview due, interview due, review TELOS, update ideal state, quarterly context refresh, fresh LifeOS install, configure DA name. NOT FOR single edits (Telos), bulk intake (Migrate), identity-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a project description or site requirements and synthesize a project constitution into SITE.md for the Stitch Build Loop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines. Use at project start to establish code quality, testing standards, and architectural constraints that guide all development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish project governing principles including dev guidelines, code quality standards, testing policies, UX requirements, performance benchmarks, and security constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design technical architecture, select technology stack, and define implementation strategy from specifications and constitution constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute development tasks to build features, producing code, tests, and configuration artifacts that satisfy specification requirements and comply with constitution standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform cross-artifact consistency and coverage analysis across constitution, specification, plan, and task artifacts to detect gaps, conflicts, and misalignments before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert prompt engineer specializing in advanced prompting techniques, LLM optimization, and AI system design. Masters chain-of-thought, constitutional AI, and production prompt strategies. Use when building AI features, improving agent performance, or crafting system prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in crafting effective prompts for LLMs through advanced techniques including constitutional AI, chain-of-thought reasoning, and model-specific optimizati

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and cite French case law and statutes with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about French or European court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, needs counts of decisions on a point, or asks what a code article says at a given date, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank — a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive understanding of the spec-kit methodology. Constitution-driven feature development with specify, plan, tasks, and implement phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户开始新小说项目时激活 - 通过温和的提示和解释引导他们完成七步方法论（constitution → specify → clarify → plan → tasks → write → analyze）

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a research thesis — theses/{nnn}-{slug}/ via mkdir-as-CAS, pillar-prioritized spec.md, initialized thesis.md, and the thesis-quality checklist. Refuses creation while the workspace constitution is unratified (spec 046 Q83 A+).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author the research plan — fundamentals first, trade ideas last; Constitution Check evaluated twice; Deviation Register with mandatory Expiry; emits the four side artifacts (brief/entities/reproduce/contracts). Technical (market_data_stage: early) theses MUST emit the entities.md bars schema before implement (Q42).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。