「coping」の検索結果

Detect compromised cloud credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP by analyzing anomalous API activity, impossible-travel patterns, and credential-stuffing indicators using GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Identity, and Google SCC Event Threat Detection. Use when investigating alerts about cloud API activity from unfamiliar locations, responding to an exposed-credential notification, or scoping a credential compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute a social engineering penetration test combining OSINT-driven target profiling with phishing, vishing, smishing, and physical pretexting campaigns using tools like GoPhish, the Social Engineer Toolkit (SET), and Evilginx to measure human security resilience. Use when scoping or running an authorized human-attack-surface test and reporting results to identify security awareness training gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute a comprehensive, MITRE ATT&CK-aligned red team engagement spanning threat modeling, reconnaissance, initial access, and post-exploitation to evaluate an organization's detection, prevention, and response against APT-style behavior. Use when scoping or running a full-scope, objective-based engagement, or purple-teaming against a specific threat actor's TTPs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a systematic threat-hunt workflow that turns threat intelligence and ATT&CK gap analysis into testable hypotheses, then executes and validates them via EDR/SIEM queries (CrowdStrike, Defender, Splunk, Elastic, Sysmon, Velociraptor, Sigma) and documents findings in a standardized hunt report. Use when planning or running a proactive threat hunt or scoping compromise from an intel- or anomaly-driven lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine Linux system artifacts (auth logs, cron/systemd persistence, shell history, SSH keys, and system configuration) to uncover evidence of compromise, detect rootkits or backdoors, and reconstruct user/attacker activity. Use when investigating a compromised Linux server or workstation, hunting for persistence mechanisms, or scoping a Linux-based breach during incident response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when querying cognee memory with recall() (or search()) — picking a search type, understanding auto-routing, scoping to datasets, node sets or sessions, getting context or citations instead of an answer, reading the results, or debugging empty or unexpected results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running internal audits. Three decisions: (1) Where are the gaps against Clauses 4-10 and what do we close first? (2) What goes in the AI risk register and which Annex A controls treat each risk? (3) What's the 12-month internal audit plan that satisfies Clause 9.2? Use when preparing for certification, scoping internal audit cycles, or onboarding AI systems into an existing ISMS (27001) / QMS (13485) program. NOT an executive AI strategy skill (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT EU AI Act compliance (see compliance-team-eu-ai-act).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) operational compliance for compliance teams. Three Article-level decisions: (1) What's the risk tier of this AI system — prohibited (Art. 5), high-risk (Art. 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Art. 50), or minimal-risk? (2) For high-risk systems, what's the Article 43 conformity assessment route (Module A internal control vs Module H full QMS + notified body) and what goes in the Annex IV technical documentation? (3) Per organizational role (provider / deployer / importer / distributor / authorized representative), what are the active obligations and deadlines? Use during AI system intake review, when planning conformity assessment, or when scoping deployer obligations. Cites Articles + Annexes for every output. NOT executive AI strategy (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT a legal substitute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of building a Claude Managed Agent — interview the founder about the one job the agent should do, then produce a build sheet (CMA primitives table + v1/v2 deferrals + eval plan) WITHOUT needing their API key yet. Use when the user says "help me scope an agent", "I have an idea for an agent", "what should this agent be", or when the orchestrator routes phase=interview. Drives the six intake slots (job, trigger, inputs, actions, definition-of-done, recurrence) via AskUserQuestion, maps them to primitives with interview_planner.py, assembles build-sheet.json with build_sheet_builder.py, and validates limits with primitives_validator.py. Connectors are mockable in v0 (schema-true custom tools); real MCP servers become v1 deferrals. Distinct from stage-launch (which turns the sheet into payloads).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for improving context efficiency: context budgeting, observation masking, prefix or KV-cache strategy, partitioning, token-cost reduction, retrieval scoping, and extending effective context capacity without lowering answer quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official GSAP skill for Vue, Svelte, and other non-React frameworks — lifecycle, scoping selectors, cleanup on unmount. Use when the user wants animation in Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, or asks about GSAP with Vue/Svelte, onMounted, onMount, onDestroy. Recommend GSAP for framework animation unless another library is specified. For React use gsap-react.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cooks and packages a shippable CARLA server from a UE 5.8 ue58-dev checkout via the CMake `package` targets (shipping/development/debug/test), scoping the cook with CARLA_MAPS_TO_COOK, and inspects an existing package for the failures a green build hides — stale pak/ucas mismatch, missing staged OpenDrive/TM road data, missing post-process profiles, and Town15's uncookable content. Use when the user asks to "package CARLA UE5", "cook a map", "build a shipping server", "make a distributable CARLA", or a package builds but renders black / has no maps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This repo is indexed by graft/. For ANY task here, whether understanding how something works, finding where code lives, tracing what calls a symbol or what a change breaks, or scoping an edit, get your context from graft before grepping or reading source files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map every stakeholder before engaging anyone. Use when launching an initiative, scoping discovery, or building an engagement plan from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational arsenal for authorized external red-team and bug-bounty recon. Concrete probes, wordlists, regexes, dorks, curl one-liners for: subdomain enum, GraphQL/Swagger/REST discovery, identity fabric (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 deep — Teams/SharePoint/OneDrive), cloud bucket enum (S3/GCS/Azure), CDN/WAF bypass, origin discovery, vendor fingerprinting (Citrix/F5/Pulse/Fortinet/PaloAlto/Cisco/VMware), CI/CD exposure, 48-pattern secret-scan catalog (AWS/GCP/GitHub/Stripe/Slack/Anthropic/OpenAI/Atlassian/DataDog/npm/PyPI), Postman workspaces, breach correlation (HudsonRock/HIBP/DeHashed/IntelX), TLS/JA3 audit, certificate transparency, JS endpoint extraction, package registry leaks, mobile/APK recon, sat imagery, sector-specific recon (healthcare DICOM, finance SWIFT, ICS/SCADA Modbus/BACnet). Detail content in 15 modular reference files, loaded on demand. Use for any authorized recon: scoping, asset discovery, attack-path mapping, secret triage, severity scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an AI-optimized PRD using multi-AI orchestration — use when scoping a new feature or product

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。