「coverage」の検索結果

Perlのテスト作成・実行から、外部処理の置き換え、例外の確認、テスト範囲の測定まで支えるスキル。テスト先行の開発や既存テストの移行にも使えます。

• テスト先行でPerlを開発
• Test::Moreからのテスト移行
• APIやDB連携を独立して検証

Rustの単体・結合・非同期テストを、テストを先に書く流れで整えます。多様な入力の検証、依存先の置き換え、性能測定やカバレッジ確認も扱います。

• Rustをテストから開発したいとき
• 既存コードにテストを追加したいとき
• 非同期処理とタイムアウトの検証

Pythonのテストをpytestで設計・作成し、共通の準備処理や外部サービスの代役、複数入力の検証、テストで確認したコードの範囲の測定まで扱うスキル。

• Pythonの機能をテストから作りたいとき
• テストの準備処理を共通化したいとき
• 外部APIをモックで検証したいとき

Measure Python SDK coverage or address measured coverage gaps. Use for coverage audits and metric regressions, not routine test additions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pseudo-mutation analysis ONLY: answer whether tests would catch a bug if production code changed, which meaningful changes would still pass, or which caller-visible mutations existing assertions would miss; verify candidates when requested, then optionally close verified gaps. Includes explicit read-only per-test composition for grading. Activate for behavioral blind spots tied to production behavior. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite taxonomy, metadata, or distribution reports (test-tagging); .NET line-vs-branch or Cobertura interpretation, arithmetic, plateaus, project-wide coverage gaps, or coverage-backed test/CRAP priorities (coverage-analysis; use native coverage tooling outside .NET); named-target CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; or mutation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure JS SDK coverage or address measured coverage gaps. Use for coverage audits and metric regressions, not routine test additions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a user-owned coverage CSV and reviewed press-clip captures into an honest, source-linked earned-media dashboard and a motion-designed highlight reel (MP4) that scrolls each real article to the client's sentence and highlights it. Use for coverage reports, earned-media dashboards, campaign recaps, or coverage videos; requires local files and composes press-clip instead of scraping articles itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate test coverage with a ratchet — a committed baseline that coverage may never drop below and only ever rises. Ships a coverage-gate script (xccov-based) plus an advisory CRAP report (complexity × uncovered). Use when agent-written code needs a deterministic "tests were actually written" check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit test coverage health, gaps, and QE debt for Jira stories or epics. Produces coverage_analysis_report.md with AC-to-TC heatmap, risk scores, and prioritized action plan. Use when assessing coverage percentage, pre-release readiness, sprint readiness, or identifying missing test cases. Do NOT use for TC creation — use zephyr-test-generation instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `ReportGenerator` tool for turning .NET coverage outputs into HTML, Markdown, Cobertura, badges, and merged reports. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants ReportGenerator; CI needs human-readable coverage reports; multiple coverage files must be merged. DO NOT USE FOR: raw coverage collection with no reporting need. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pseudo-mutation analysis ONLY: answer whether tests would catch a bug if production code changed, which meaningful changes would still pass, or which caller-visible mutations existing assertions would miss; verify candidates when requested, then optionally close verified gaps. Includes explicit read-only per-test composition for grading. Activate for behavioral blind spots tied to production behavior. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite taxonomy, metadata, or distribution reports (test-tagging); .NET line-vs-branch or Cobertura interpretation, arithmetic, plateaus, project-wide coverage gaps, or coverage-backed test/CRAP priorities (coverage-analysis; use native coverage tooling outside .NET); named-target CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; or mutation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze test coverage gaps and generate tests to improve coverage. Use when improving test coverage, finding untested code, or writing missing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing test suites and source code to suggest additional unit tests that improve test coverage. Use this skill when working with test files and source code to identify untested code paths, missing edge cases, uncovered branches, untested error conditions, and gaps in test coverage. Supports major testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go testing, etc.) and generates targeted test suggestions based on coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, track, and act on QA metrics: test coverage percentage, flakiness rate, defect escape rate, MTTR, test execution time trends, automation ROI, quality gates, and SLAs for test suites. Includes metric formulas, realistic targets by company stage, and the action to take when each metric goes red. Use when: "QA metrics," "test metrics," "quality KPIs," "test health," "flakiness rate," "defect escape rate." Not for: building the dashboard UI (Allure/Grafana) — use qa-dashboard; measuring coverage gaps and mutation score — use coverage-analysis. Related: qa-dashboard, coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, release-readiness, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Coverage and insurance resources with payer diversity including Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, Tricare, VA, and self-pay. Use when user mentions coverage, insurance, payer, Medicare, Medicaid, benefits, or coordination of benefits. For claims and EOB see the claims-eob skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

解析 Verilator coverage.dat + sim log，输出 functional + code coverage 数值，判断是否 100% 达标。触发场景：(1) bb-invoke-verilator 后；(2) 每次回归后；(3) 显式 /bb-collect-coverage。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze test coverage with detailed metrics, identify gaps, and generate comprehensive reports. Use when measuring code coverage, finding untested code, or validating coverage thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates detection coverage by mapping Atomic Red Team tests to ATT&CK techniques, checking which of your detections cover each tested technique, and reporting coverage gaps. Activates for requests to validate detections with atomic tests, map Atomic Red Team to coverage, or find detection gaps against tested techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps hunts and detections to MITRE ATT&CK for coverage analysis: tagging hypotheses with techniques, building a coverage matrix from completed hunts, and identifying high-risk gaps to prioritize next. Activates for requests to map hunts to ATT&CK, build a coverage heatmap, or find detection gaps by technique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create QA test strategy documents, coverage matrices, and risk-based test prioritization plans. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to plan what to test, why, and at what depth. Trigger on phrases like "write a test strategy", "test strategy document", "what should we test", "prioritize testing", "risk-based testing", "test coverage plan", "QA approach for this project", "coverage matrix", "test scope", "how should we approach testing this quarter", "where are our coverage gaps", or any request to define the strategic plan for testing - not the execution of it. Also trigger at project kickoff when a QA lead asks "how do we approach quality on this?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive test suite review across five phases. Surveys unit coverage, integration coverage, E2E (browser) coverage for webapps, fuzz coverage, and test quality — in that order. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement test changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。