227 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Python background job patterns including task queues, workers, and event-driven architecture. Use when implementing async task processing, job queues, long-running operations, or decoupling work from request/response cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use this skill when designing clean architecture for a new microservice, when refactoring a monolith to use bounded contexts, when implementing hexagonal or onion architecture patterns, or when debugging dependency cycles between application layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic account planning and execution for enterprise deals. Use when planning complex sales cycles, managing multiple stakeholders, applying MEDDICC qualification, tracking deal health, or building mutual action plans. Includes the "stale MAP equals dead deal" pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral finance applications: theories of overreaction and underreaction, behavioral explanations for momentum and reversal, investor sentiment cycles, cognitive-bias checklists, and debiasing quantitative strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commodity analysis (oil supply-demand balance / gold pricing / copper as an economic predictor / inventory cycles / futures premium-discount structure / seasonality), generating directional commodity signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running internal audits. Three decisions: (1) Where are the gaps against Clauses 4-10 and what do we close first? (2) What goes in the AI risk register and which Annex A controls treat each risk? (3) What's the 12-month internal audit plan that satisfies Clause 9.2? Use when preparing for certification, scoping internal audit cycles, or onboarding AI systems into an existing ISMS (27001) / QMS (13485) program. NOT an executive AI strategy skill (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT EU AI Act compliance (see compliance-team-eu-ai-act).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to track technical changes, create change records, manage TC lifecycles, or hand off work between AI sessions. Covers init/create/update/status/resume/close/export workflows for structured code change documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides recommendations for environmental sustainability, carbon footprint reduction, and energy efficiency based on the Sustainability pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use when the user asks to assess, design, or optimize Google Cloud workloads for sustainability—including the shared responsibility model, selecting low-carbon regions (CFE%), reducing resource and AI/ML energy waste, designing efficient software and storage lifecycles, or measuring and tracking emissions using Google Cloud Carbon Footprint. Don't use for financial cost reduction (use google-cloud-waf-cost-optimization), latency and throughput tuning (use google-cloud-waf-performance-optimization), or high availability and disaster recovery (use google-cloud-waf-reliability).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides workflows to optimize BigQuery environments (capacity planning, editions), storage assets (partitioning, clustering, storage lifecycles, billing models), and SQL queries. Use when optimizing cost, modeling Edition migrations, rightsizing reservations, evaluating logical vs. physical storage, designing table partitioning/clustering, generating table DDL, migrating unpartitioned tables, managing partition expiration, optimizing individual SQL queries, or evaluating acceleration structures (search indexes, materialized views, BI Engine). Do not use for raw usage reporting (use bigquery-observability), query execution plan analysis, error troubleshooting, or diagnosing why a specific job was slow (use bigquery-troubleshooting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative improvement loop — refine a target across multiple Algorithm cycles toward ideal state. USE WHEN loop, iterate, refine, multiple passes, keep improving, revisit, rework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linear project management expert for issues, cycles, projects, and workflow automation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the contribution workflow for Apache Beam, including creating PRs, issue management, code review process, release cycles, and rigorous evaluation rules for high-risk core component changes. Use when contributing code, creating PRs, or modifying core Beam components.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or requests fix-review cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture and inspect iOS leaks and memgraphs. Use when debugging leaked objects, retain cycles, memory growth, or before/after leak evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Apache Pinot correctness when null handling, numeric types, dispatch, or resource lifecycles change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Linear tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, cycles, teams, labels. Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WARNING: guides potentially IRREVERSIBLE BlueField-4 hardware operations (PLDM firmware burns, ISO reflashes, power cycles, BMC factory resets) that can brick firmware, corrupt boot media, or cause outages — a maintenance window and rollback plan are required, and every mutating step is governed by doca-hardware-safety, loaded alongside. Use this skill for BlueField-4 (BF4) day-1 platform bring-up from the BMC: installing the BlueField/DOCA bundle ISO onto the DPU (Grace, the Arm complex) over UEFI HTTP Boot, PXE, or Redfish Virtual Media; the PLDM firmware-update flow (BMC, NIC firmware, SBIOS, ERoT) via the Redfish UpdateService and pldmtool; and a Grace Ubuntu image with optional cloud-init. Trigger on BlueField-4/BF4 bring-up phrasings even without "BF4": {bring up my new BlueField-4}, {the BlueField ISO will not boot over HTTP from the BMC}, {attach BF4 virtual media via Redfish}, {BF4 firmware Task stuck at Running}. BF3 bring-up, application launch, and library APIs belong to other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user is measuring the host or DPU-CPU control-plane rate of a DOCA Flow pipeline with doca_flow_perf — picking a JSON policy from configs/, choosing the DPDK or DOCA backend, running the single-iteration smoke then the iterative eval loop, interpreting per-iteration CPU cycles and num_pushed / num_failed, or capturing the four-tuple (DOCA version, BlueField/firmware, JSON policy, worker/queue/burst config) that makes a Kops/sec number defensible. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca-flow-perf" — typical implicit phrasings include "how many rules per second can my BlueField insert", "5-tuple hairpin rule rate", "Kops/sec for steering", "flow-perf number does not match release notes", "DPDK vs DOCA benchmark", or "rule-install variance too high". Refuse and route elsewhere for optimizing a live Flow app (doca-flow-tune), the DPA-offloaded path (doca-flow-dpa-perf), dataplane throughput or latency, or library-internal pipe semantics — those belong to other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `gopatch`), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code smell blocks a feature, or the user asks to refactor Go code — also for renaming at scale, extracting functions or interfaces, moving code between packages, or planning a multi-step refactor. Target styles owned elsewhere → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` (renames), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-project-layout` (splits), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-modernize` (idioms), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style` (control flow), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns` (patterns/DI).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze how a private SaaS company's ARR valuation multiple changed across funding rounds, and attribute the compression or expansion to rate cycles and macro selloffs, growth deceleration, narrative shifts (including an AI premium), competition, and investor demand, benchmarked against private-market medians and peers. Use this skill whenever the user asks about valuation compression, ARR multiples, round-to-round valuation or multiple changes, down rounds, or wants to compare a VC-backed software company's funding rounds. Research the rounds rather than answering from memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。