「dead code」の検索結果

Simplification audit or authorized codebase simplification whose stated objective is to remove accidental complexity. Use for evidence-backed deletion or consolidation of dead code, duplicate state, redundant APIs or layers, ownerless abstractions, obsolete compatibility or design records, and over-engineering in any language; also use for 代码简化 or 熵回收. Do not use for general code review, onboarding, style-only refactoring, or performance tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code, (3) You need to understand how a TLA+ violation maps to program-level bugs, (4) You want to validate repairs by re-running TLC. Supports safety properties (invariants), liveness properties (temporal logic), and deadlock detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-agent cleanup pattern. Implementer works freely, then a dedicated cleanup agent removes unused imports, console.logs, commented-out code, dead code, and formatting issues. Produces a diff of what was cleaned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract maximum value from existing code — performance optimization, API surface refinement, and dead weight elimination. The art of turning base code into gold through systematic identification and amplification of value-bearing patterns. Use when optimizing a working but sluggish codebase, refining an API surface that has accumulated cruft, reducing bundle size or memory footprint, or preparing code for open-source release — when code works correctly but doesn't shine and needs polish rather than a full rewrite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit ClawJS/Clawix code hygiene without editing code, producing categorized findings, baseline status, and validation evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans the codebase for dead code, tech debt, outdated dependencies, and code quality issues. Delegates to the Centinela (QA) agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex feels slow or bloated, when local sessions/logs/worktrees/config have grown over time, or when a user wants safe maintenance for Codex Desktop/CLI state. Provides a read-only report by default, backs up before applying changes, archives instead of deleting, normalizes Windows extended paths, prunes dead config projects, rotates large logs, and moves stale worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit, trim, cut, caption, subtitle, reframe, combine, add background music to, or export video, audio, and image files through Cassette. Use this skill whenever the user asks to change, preview, or render a media file in the project — even if they never say "Cassette" or name a tool — for example "trim the intro off demo.mp4", "add subtitles to this clip", "make me a 30-second cut with music", "why is there dead air at the start". Drives the local Oh My Cassette stdio MCP tools in Codex or Claude as one multi-turn conversation with the Cassette agent, with per-turn timeline previews, guided questions, and rendering only on explicit export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplify code, plans and systems without losing required outcomes; delete machinery that earns nothing; for code, AST-measured complexity with regression gates. Triggers: simplify, refactor, complexity, overengineered, dead code, useless guard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Java concurrency code for thread safety, race conditions, deadlocks, and modern patterns (Virtual Threads, CompletableFuture, @Async). Use when user asks "check thread safety", "concurrency review", "async code review", or when reviewing multi-threaded code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after every code change, after writing tests, or before marking a task complete, and when the user says verify, quality gate, or audit code. Runs a 7-category mechanical check for TDZ, import, dead code, and mock leakage bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security scan, dead code detection, and code quality audit for any project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate ManagedCode.Orleans.Graph into an Orleans-based .NET application for grain-call policy enforcement, deadlock detection, live-call telemetry, and Mermaid graph diagnostics. USE FOR: ManagedCode.Orleans.Graph integration; allowed grain transitions; Orleans call filters; live policy graphs; reviewing Orleans call-cycle risk. DO NOT USE FOR: generic graph data modeling or traversal unrelated to Orleans calls. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain one committed per-project memory file (PROJECT.md) so agents stop re-discovering the same facts every cold session. Stores only the stable, expensive-to-rediscover, not-in-the-code context — architecture + why, build/test/run commands, decisions and dead-ends — as human-readable markdown, versioned with the code so it can't silently rot. Use when asked to set up project memory/context, stop agents re-grepping the codebase, scaffold or refresh a PROJECT.md / CLAUDE.md memory section, or cut cold-start rediscovery cost. Prose context only — never code, config, or data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix PostgreSQL deadlock errors caused by concurrent schema initialization in worker processes. Use when: (1) psycopg2.errors.DeadlockDetected during CREATE INDEX/TABLE IF NOT EXISTS, (2) Multiple Cloud Run jobs, Kubernetes pods, or worker processes start simultaneously, (3) Error shows "Process X waits for RowExclusiveLock... blocked by process Y", (4) init_schema() or migration code runs at worker startup. The key insight: "IF NOT EXISTS" is NOT truly concurrent-safe - PostgreSQL still acquires locks that can deadlock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeping codebases healthy, performant, and maintainable - refactoring, performance optimization, and technical debt managementUse when "refactor, optimize, performance, technical debt, cleanup, architecture, speed up, bundle size, memory leak, slow query, code smell, complexity, dead code, performance, refactoring, optimization, technical-debt, architecture, cleanup, bundle, memory" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find, rank, and safely remove accidental codebase complexity by proving real consumers, dynamic entrypoints, compatibility obligations, duplicate representations, speculative surfaces, and lifecycle ownership. Use when asked to simplify or clean up a repository, reclaim code entropy, reduce over-engineering or redundancy, find deletion candidates, collapse duplicate state/APIs, remove dead or added-then-abandoned code beyond static-tool output, or implement an evidence-backed simplification pass in any language or stack. Also trigger for 代码化简、熵回收、删代码、清理冗余、收敛抽象、去除过度设计. Do not use as a performance audit unless simplification is the stated goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects common LLM coding agent artifacts across four categories (tests, dead code, abstraction, style) over the project or changed files — using parallel subagents when the agent supports them, otherwise four sequential passes. Scans files changed since main by default; use --all for full-project scan. Triggers on LLM cruft cleanup, agent-generated code review, dead code sweeps, test-quality passes, or when the user asks to scan the whole repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review touched code for maintainability smells such as duplication, awkward indirection, suspicious clones, dead code, poor naming, and Boy Scout cleanup opportunities. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated maintainability pass or when the user asks for code-smell review specifically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to analyze a file, a directory, or the whole codebase to understand structure, architecture, dependencies, complexity, duplication, dead code, or technical debt — e.g. "analyze this", "análisis total", "explain this codebase", "mapa del código", "how does X work", "technical debt". Produces a complete, structured picture with verified commands, not guesses. Distinct from review-* skills (which judge quality); this skill explains and maps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code hygiene gate — detect and eliminate dead code, duplicates, naming mess, and code smells. TRIZ-powered. Run after features, before PRs, during debt sprints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。