「deep-dive」の検索結果

A short self-bias checklist to run at the START of any investment research task (stock screen / sector study / company deep-dive). Four biases that systematically warp AI research — leader-bias (only big caps), English-bias (miss JP/KR/TW players), narrative-bias (chase concept labels), confirmation-bias (only bullish evidence) — plus recency-bias. Load this first, then research with the corrections in mind. Not a workflow, just a 60-second attitude reset that materially improves coverage and honesty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep management assessment — the 'buying a stock is buying a person' layer. For a company or a named executive, evaluate integrity (promise-vs-delivery tracking, crisis behavior, stakeholder treatment), ability (strategic foresight, execution, capital-allocation record) and governance (equity structure, compensation, related-party deals). Outputs a weighted score across integrity / ability / capital-allocation / governance plus Duan Yongping's 3-question verdict ('would you hand this person your money for 10 years'). Use when standard research leaves management quality uncertain, or when management IS the investment thesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a publication-grade 8-part deep-dive series on a single company (~120k words total): cognitive reset / moat / profit engine / hidden assets / era variable (e.g. AI) / financials Buffett-style / management / valuation+redlines. The core IP is NOT writing but REVISING — a strict fact-check checklist catches pseudo-precision (probability-weighted expectations, third-party MAU discrepancies, linear extrapolation), absolute language, and cross-article number inconsistencies that most finance long-forms violate. Each piece stands alone but shares one valuation/management/price framework. Use when the user wants textbook-level depth on one company for public publishing (a single research report or earnings note is NOT this — use investment-research / earnings-review instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive on a single opportunity - signal-adjusted health score, risks, gaps in qualification, and recommended next actions. Use when the user asks "review the [account] deal", "deal review on [opp]", "is [opp] going to close", or "what's the risk on [deal]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix, debug, or make a specific feature/module/area work end-to-end. Triggers: 'make X work', 'fix the Y feature', 'the Z module is broken', 'focus on [area]'. Not for quick single-bug fixes — this is for systematic deep-dive repair across all files and dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing public-company earnings after results, guidance, transcript, or call commentary. Do not use for pre-print previews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang everyday observability — the always-on signals in production. Covers structured logging with slog, Prometheus metrics, OpenTelemetry distributed tracing, continuous profiling with pprof/Pyroscope, server-side RUM event tracking, alerting, and Grafana dashboards. Apply when instrumenting Go services for production monitoring, setting up metrics or alerting, adding OpenTelemetry tracing, correlating logs with traces, migrating legacy loggers (zap/logrus/zerolog) to slog, adding observability to new features, or implementing GDPR/CCPA-compliant tracking with Customer Data Platforms (CDP). Not for temporary deep-dive performance investigation (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` and `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance` skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive analysis of GitHub projects. Use when the user mentions a GitHub repo/project name and wants to understand it — triggered by phrases like "help me look at this project", "learn about XXX", "what is this project like", "analyze this repo", or any request to explore/evaluate a GitHub project. Covers architecture, community health, competitive landscape, and cross-platform knowledge sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates rich technical documentation pages with dark-mode Mermaid diagrams, source code citations, and first-principles depth. Use when writing documentation, generating wiki pages, creating technical deep-dives, or documenting specific components or systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "monitor my launch", "track our Product Hunt / Hacker News ranking", or "watch the launch window"; runs the T-0 to T+30 window watch — pre-launch instrumentation verification (UTM/event checks, the upstream of RAMP P1), HN rank/points/comments polling with a comments-over-points flamewar early-warning (Estimated heuristic), PH votes/featured status, store charts and reviews, news echo, D0/W1/M1 KPI snapshots vs targets, spike-vs-sustain and owned-capture reads, and alert thresholds against the launch-tier KPI targets. Not for launch-day go/rollback calls — use launch-day-conductor; not for metric deep-dives — use performance-analyzer; not for SEO rank tracking — use rank-tracker. 发布监控/排名轮询/火焰战比/spike-sustain

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze my target audience", "build an audience profile for influencer targeting", "research a niche community", or "deep-dive a subculture before partnering with creators"; in audience mode produces demographic/psychographic profiles, a platform-priority matrix, named personas, and an influencer-selection criteria set, and in niche mode produces a community map, culture decode (language/norms/taboos), key-voice tiers, a Brand Fit Score, and a phased entry strategy. Not for finding specific creators to contract — use influencer-discovery; not for scoring a shortlist on Suitability — use fit-scorer. 目标受众画像/人群分析 · 细分社群/亚文化调研

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate notes between Apple Notes, Obsidian, Notion, and other platforms. Trigger: "apple notes migration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Apollo.io migration strategies. Use when migrating from other CRMs to Apollo, consolidating data sources, or executing large-scale data migrations. Trigger with phrases like "apollo migration", "migrate to apollo", "apollo data import", "crm to apollo", "apollo migration strategy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate to Claude API from OpenAI, Gemini, or other LLM providers. Use when switching from GPT-4 to Claude, migrating from Text Completions, or building a multi-provider abstraction layer. Trigger with phrases like "migrate to claude", "openai to anthropic", "switch from gpt to claude", "multi-provider llm".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute a reversible migration from another search system or legacy index design to Algolia. Use when translating schemas, queries, relevance behavior, or production traffic. Trigger with "migrate to Algolia", "Algolia cutover", or "search engine migration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and execute a multi-workload migration into or across Adobe services with contract evidence, dependency waves, dual-run reconciliation, cost controls, and rollback. Use when the task requires adobe platform migration program. Trigger with "Adobe migration plan", "move workflow to Adobe", or "Adobe platform consolidation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude-native deep research using DAG-based query planning, parallel subagent execution, and gap-driven iteration. No external API needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a complete, beginner-friendly explanation of an entire code repository as a set of markdown files. Maps the repo structure with `treecap` (installing it if missing), studies the actual source, then writes a `CODE_EXPLANATION/` folder containing an `OVERVIEW.md` plus numbered deep-dive files (01_architecture.md, 02_models.md, ...) that explain how the code is built, what it does, and how the pieces fit together — illustrated with real code excerpts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, document, onboard onto, or get a walkthrough of a codebase: phrases like "explain this repo", "explain the code", "code explanation", "walk me through this codebase", "help me understand how this is built", "document the architecture", or "what does this project do" — even if they don't say the word "skill". Prefer this over ad-hoc summaries whenever the goal is a durable, written explanation of a whole repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates comprehensive technical documentation from existing codebases. Analyzes architecture, design patterns, and implementation details to produce long-form technical manuals and ebooks. Use PROACTIVELY for system documentation, architecture guides, or technical deep-dives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。