「deserialization」の検索結果

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for file uploads, imports, previews, archive extraction, format conversion, parser invocation, and deserialization chains. Use when the user asks to inspect an upload or import path, trace archive extraction, preview or converter behavior, explain how a file reaches a parser or deserializer, or connect one uploaded artifact to the decisive backend effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt this C/C++ ASAN vulnerability pipeline to a different vulnerability class, target shape, language, or detection mechanism. Use when the user wants to port, migrate, retarget, customize, or fork the pipeline for something other than C/C++ memory-safety bugs — web apps, smart contracts, deserialization, ML systems, or any other domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete reference for 26 web2 bug classes with root causes, detection patterns, bypass tables, exploit techniques, and real paid examples. Covers IDOR, auth bypass, XSS (postMessage), SSRF (11 IP bypass techniques), SQLi, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC, file upload (10 bypass techniques), GraphQL, LLM/AI (ASI01-ASI10, MCP/RAG attacks), API misconfig (mass assignment, JWT, prototype pollution, CORS), ATO (9 paths), SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, MFA bypass (7 patterns), SAML attacks, error disclosure, CSS injection, LFI/RCE, insecure deserialization, dependency confusion, padding oracle. Use when hunting a specific vuln class or studying what makes bugs pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Laravel specific vulnerabilities — Debug mode leakage (APP_DEBUG=true exposes full stack trace + env vars), Laravel Telescope/Horizon dashboard unauthorized access, Ignition RCE (CVE-2021-3129), Signed URL manipulation, Queue Worker abuse, mass assignment via Eloquent, deserialization via cookies, .env file exposure. Use when target runs Laravel (PHP) — detected via X-Powered-By, Laravel session cookies, or /storage/ paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt ASP.NET-specific surface — ViewState deserialization (signed-only vs encrypted), machineKey recovery, dual-parser MAC-bypass anti-pattern, request-validator bypass, trace.axd/elmah.axd disclosure, load-balanced ViewState cross-node failures, SafeControl enumeration via reflection, customErrors mode=Off stack-trace leaks, classic Webforms .aspx/.asmx/.svc surface. Built for ASP.NET Webforms + WCF + SharePoint farms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call a C# method by reflection — including private methods. Requires a method schema obtained via 'reflection-method-find'. Supports static methods, instance methods (with optional target deserialization), and main-thread / off-thread execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Java "Ghost Bits" / Cast Attack playbook (Black Hat Asia 2026). Use when attacking Java services where 16-bit char is silently narrowed to 8-bit byte to bypass WAF/IDS for SQL injection, deserialization RCE, file upload (Webshell), path traversal, CRLF injection, request smuggling, and SMTP injection. Affects Tomcat, Spring, Jetty, Undertow, Vert.x, Jackson, Fastjson, Apache Commons BCEL, Apache HttpClient, Angus Mail, JDK HttpServer, Lettuce, Jodd, XMLWriter and re-enables many "patched" CVEs through WAF bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with the Upstash Redis JavaScript/TypeScript SDK for serverless Redis operations. Use for caching, session storage, rate limiting, leaderboards, full-text search (querying, filtering, aggregating with @upstash/redis search extension), and all Redis data structures. Supports automatic serialization/deserialization of JavaScript types. Search also available via @upstash/search-redis and @upstash/search-ioredis adapters for TCP clients.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply Java secure coding best practices — including validating untrusted inputs, defending against injection attacks with parameterized queries, minimizing attack surface via least privilege, applying strong cryptographic algorithms, handling exceptions securely without exposing sensitive data, managing secrets at runtime, avoiding unsafe deserialization, and encoding output to prevent XSS. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for secure coding; Find input validation risks in Java code; Review Java code for injection vulnerabilities; Improve secure error handling in Java services; Harden Java code against common security flaws. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security intelligence for code analysis. Detects SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication issues, crypto failures, and more. Actions: scan, analyze, fix, audit, check, review, secure, validate, sanitize, protect. Languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, PHP, Java, Go, Ruby. Frameworks: Express, Django, Flask, Laravel, Spring, Rails. Vulnerabilities: SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication bypass, authorization issues, command injection, path traversal, insecure deserialization, weak crypto, sensitive data exposure. Topics: input validation, output encoding, parameterized queries, password hashing, session management, CORS, CSP, security headers, rate limiting, dependency scanning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing source code for vulnerabilities — drive CodeQL/Semgrep/Joern to taint untrusted data source-to-sink across injection, memory safety, deserialization/prototype-pollution, secrets/crypto/authz/race, and supply-chain risks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pentesting a web application or API — injection, XSS/CSP, SSRF/cloud-metadata, HTTP desync & cache poisoning, SSTI/prototype-pollution/deserialization, JWT/OAuth/GraphQL/IDOR, business logic & single-packet race

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing JSON serialization/deserialization with Jackson and `@JsonTest`. Validates JSON mapping, custom serializers, date formats, and polymorphic types. Use when testing JSON serialization, validating custom serializers, or writing JSON unit tests in Spring Boot applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RCE hunting - template injection, YAML/XML deserialization, dependency confusion, Kubernetes surfaces, CVE-specific exploits (Apache CVE-2021-41773, Spring CVE-2022-22963). OOB-mandatory for blind cases. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes secure remediation strategies for detected security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks, insecure deserialization, improper authentication, and unsafe cryptographic usage. Provides recommended security checks, safer API alternatives, design-level changes, code examples, trade-off analysis, and prioritized remediation plans. Does NOT automatically modify code unless explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing Java or Kotlin server changes on Spring or Quarkus - security config and method security, JPA/JPQL and JdbcTemplate queries, request binding, deserialization, XML parsers, SpEL, templates, Actuator, JNDI and reflection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models and hardens an application, API, data flow, dependency, or deployment against authentication and authorization flaws, injection, secrets exposure, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, abuse, privacy loss, and supply-chain risk. Use for security review, threat modeling, hardening, or sensitive changes. Not for generic code style review or an unexplained bug without a security hypothesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change for security defects such as secret exposure, injection, authentication/authorization failures, unsafe deserialization, and dependency risk. Use for an independent security perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。