「fid」の検索結果

Identify insects using body plan analysis, dichotomous keys to order, wing venation, mouthpart type, antennae form, leg and tarsal structure, and confidence levels. Covers the fundamental hexapod body plan verification, a simplified dichotomous key to major orders, wing venation and type analysis, mouthpart classification, antennae morphology, leg specialization and tarsal formula, and a structured confidence assessment framework. Use when you need to identify an unknown insect beyond preliminary order placement, are working through a specimen for taxonomic study, want to distinguish between similar orders or families, or need to assign a confidence level to a field identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add an external probabilistic classifier to a decision path without letting it take the path over. Covers finding the externally-graded rows you are already logging, measuring the confidence separation between the overrides it got right and the ones it got wrong, choosing an operating point your data licenses, failing open at the call site, and proving the whole arrangement offline with no API key. Applies to any service returning a score you can order — TypeSafe AI's System One models (Jev) are the worked example. Most of the method transfers to a local model or a second heuristic, with the parts that do not called out where they arise. Use when a rule-based path is wrong often enough to hurt, when someone proposes replacing a heuristic with a model, when a confidence threshold needs a defensible value, or when an oracle already in production has never been graded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns untargeted LC-MS/MS features (m/z, RT, MS/MS) into confidence-stratified metabolite annotations using spectral-library matching (matchms), in-silico tools (SIRIUS/CSI:FingerID, MetFrag) and molecular networking, and assigns a defensible MSI/Schymanski confidence level to each. Use when naming detected features, scoring MS/MS against a reference library, running SIRIUS, or deciding what confidence level an evidence set actually supports. For upstream feature extraction see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing and metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; for downstream enrichment that must respect these levels see metabolomics/pathway-mapping; for lipid-specific structural annotation see metabolomics/lipidomics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build low-fidelity wireframes, screen mockups, and user-flow diagrams in Frame0 (the hand-drawn Balsamiq-style wireframing tool) through its connected MCP server. Use when asked to wireframe a screen, sketch a UI, make a low-fi mockup, lay out an app's screens, or diagram a user flow with clickable links. Triggers: "wireframe", "frame0", "low-fi mockup", "sketch a screen", "user flow", "lo-fi", "rough out the UI". NOT for high-fidelity visual design, brand systems, or color/typography polish (use web-design-expert / Figma); NOT for production UI code (use frontend skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

調査テーマを複数の問いに分け、ウェブ情報の検索と本文の読み込みを通じて、出典・確信度・情報不足を明記したレポートにまとめるスキル。

• 競合や市場動向を調べたいとき
• 導入前に技術を比較したいとき
• 市場規模や成長予測の調査

Claude Codeでの修正や繰り返し作業から、確信度付きの小さな行動ルールを抽出し、プロジェクト別に管理してスキルやコマンドへ育てるスキル。

• 修正指示や反復作業の知識化
• プロジェクト別の規約管理
• 行動ルールのスキル・コマンド化

目標画像と実装した3Dシーンのスクリーンショットを比較し、構図・照明・質感を段階的に改善します。見た目の再現度を採点し、描画速度も確認しながら修正を重ねるスキルです。

• 目標画像に近い3Dシーンを作りたいとき
• ブラウザゲームの照明や質感を磨きたいとき
• 既存の3D作品の見た目を改善したいとき

An annotated / redline lo-fi wireframe — a desktop landing/marketing page drawn as flat greyboxes inside a browser chrome frame, overlaid with numbered annotation pins (①②③④⑤) in a single accent color, paired with a right-hand SPEC PANEL that lists each numbered pin with a short engineering / UX note. This is the "wireframe + redline spec" style — clean, flat, low-fidelity, NOT hand-drawn. Use when the brief asks for "annotated wireframe", "redline wireframe", "wireframe with spec", "lo-fi landing wireframe", "low fidelity", "线框图", "标注线框", or "redline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure and draft a Confidential Information Memorandum for sell-side M&A processes. Organizes company information into a professional, investor-ready document with consistent formatting and narrative flow. Use when preparing sell-side materials, drafting a CIM, or organizing company data for a sale process. Triggers on "CIM", "confidential information memorandum", "offering memorandum", "info memo", "draft CIM", or "sell-side materials".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects. Use when triaging a suspicious PDF attachment from a phishing email, analyzing a PDF-based exploit document, or building detection signatures for weaponized PDF threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。