「fixes」の検索結果

Per-page Codex review + targeted python-pptx / Beamer fixes for academic talk slides. Use AFTER /paper-slides (or any externally generated PPTX/Beamer) when the deck looks 'mostly OK' but the user wants a final pass that aligns visual weight with a reference, bumps PPTX fonts to projector-readable size, kills italic style leaks, fixes text-frame overflow, and catches per-slide layout drift. Trigger phrases: "polish slides", "slides 排版不对", "PPTX 字体太小", "和 Beamer 比一下", "per-page review", "和 codex 一页一页过".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate candidate fixes for verified security findings. Consumes TRIAGE.json (preferred), VULN-FINDINGS.json, INCIDENTS.json, or a vuln-pipeline results directory. Pipeline input is delegated to the execution-verified `vuln-pipeline patch` ladder; static-analysis input gets a per-finding patch subagent + independent reviewer and is written as inert diffs for human review. Writes PATCHES/bug_NN/{patch.diff,patch_result.json}, PATCHES.md, and PATCHES.json. Use when asked to "fix the findings", "patch these vulns", "generate fixes", or "close the loop on triage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Addresses and fixes findings from a QA code review. Reads the review report, fixes critical and warning issues, and prepares for re-verification. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documentation conventions for NeMo-RL. Covers docs/index.md updates and docstring format. Do NOT use for: bug fixes, test fixes, dependency bumps, refactoring, CI/CD changes, performance tuning, or any task that does not involve writing or updating documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creating and improving listing content, covering titles, descriptions, attribute completeness, categorization fixes, image callouts written as text, edits written from material the operator supplies, and content-quality audits and bulk fixes across many listings. Not needed for questions about how a listing is performing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply approved Xcode build optimization changes following best practices, then re-benchmark to verify improvement. Use when a developer has an approved optimization plan from xcode-build-orchestrator, wants to apply specific build fixes, needs help implementing build setting changes, script phase guards, source-level compilation fixes, or SPM restructuring that was recommended by an analysis skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement approved SEO fixes on a connected CMS, approval-gated. "push the audit fixes live"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summon shadow clones: genjutsu's full-scale pipeline for a whole website or web app, from scratch or as a full redesign. Harvests the client's real material, researches in parallel, lets Impeccable lead the direction and genjutsu the motion, builds the pages with parallel agents, then loops fixes, verdicts and a cold-eyes art director until only minor issues remain, the round cap of the chosen tier is reached, or a round fixes nothing. Announces its cost first and asks twice. Web. Needs a host that can spawn subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase debugging framework that ensures root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Never jump to solutions. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes slow Neo4j Cypher queries by reading execution plans, identifying bad operators (AllNodesScan, CartesianProduct, Eager, NodeByLabelScan), and prescribing fixes (indexes, hints, query rewrites, runtime selection). Use when a query is slow, when EXPLAIN or PROFILE output needs interpretation, when dbHits or pageCacheHitRatio are poor, when cardinality estimation diverges from actuals, or when deciding between slotted/pipelined/parallel runtimes. Covers USING INDEX / USING SCAN / USING JOIN hints, db.stats.retrieve, SHOW QUERIES, SHOW TRANSACTIONS, TERMINATE TRANSACTION. Does NOT write new Cypher from scratch — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT cover GDS algorithm tuning — use neo4j-gds-skill. Does NOT cover index/constraint creation syntax details — use neo4j-cypher-skill references/indexes.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix routine that fixes the whole class of bug, not just the reported instance. Use for any bug report, failing production behaviour, monitoring alert, audit finding or review finding that does real harm (a smaller review finding goes on the item's list, as ship-check says), and whenever the same kind of bug has been seen before. Reproduces it with a failing test, names the failure class, searches the task's scope for the same pattern (the whole codebase when the user's own prompt asks for the fix, not when it is picked from a task's list), fixes or records every hit, and adds the rule, invariant, helper or check that stops it coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and validate Azure infrastructure in a lab or sandbox using Azure CLI and official Microsoft docs. Use when creating verification environments, provisioning hub-and-spoke VNets, VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute-adjacent validation labs, checking subscription/tenant access, debugging Azure deployment constraints, comparing before/after route behavior, or cleaning up lab resources. Triggers on 'Azure 検証', '検証環境', 'PoC', 'sandbox', 'lab', 'Azure CLI で構築', 'VPN Gateway', 'VNet peering', 'BGP', 'route validation', 'summarizedGatewayPrefixes', 'デプロイして検証', 'インフラ検証'.

Run an explicit end-to-end goal loop with frozen Scope/criteria, worker delegation, external verification, evaluator review, and bounded retries. Use when the user asks for 'goal-loop', 'ゴールまで回す', '必ずやり遂げる', 'loop until done', 'until it actually works', or an orchestrator + evaluator loop. Do not use for ordinary planning, casual advice, reviews, or small single-file fixes.

Conduct structured root cause analysis using Ishikawa (Fishbone), 5 Whys, and Pareto methods. Suitable for production incidents, quality defects, customer complaints, and recurring operational problems. Use when problems recur or when initial fixes do not resolve the issue. Do not use for one-time, obvious fixes or strategic decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates specific, implementable fixes for every finding in findings.json. Produces code patches (unified diff), configuration changes, dependency updates, and IaC fixes — not generic advice but actual before/after code. Uses the reproduction command from each finding as the verification step: "run this after the fix — it should now fail." Stores remediation data in findings.json so the dashboard shows a Fix button and /gh-export includes the remediation in GitHub issues. Chains from /pentester, /codebase, or any scan skill after findings are produced. Chains into /gh-export for export with remediation included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and resolve PR review comments on the current branch's PR in this Flutter repository, from both AI reviewers (CodeRabbit, CodiumAI, CodePilot, Copilot, etc.) and human reviewers. Fetches comments via `gh`, splits them into AI and human groups, verifies each comment against the actual Flutter code, triages them, proposes fixes, and optionally applies fixes, replies to comments, and pushes. Use when the user asks to review PR comments, resolve PR feedback, review AI comments, review human review comments, or handle code review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。