「formative」の検索結果

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an error analysis protocol to diagnose the root cause of student mistakes and misconceptions. Use when error patterns appear in student work and targeted feedback is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a five-level rubric with coherent logic for a learning target within a developmental band. Use for Manning methodology programmes where Competent = success. For general curriculum rubrics, use criterion-referenced-rubric-generator instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a checking-for-understanding protocol with specific techniques for each lesson stage. Use when planning systematic comprehension checks during explicit or direct instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret learning analytics data and translate dashboard findings into actionable teaching decisions. Use when reviewing LMS data, quiz patterns, or engagement metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and redesign AI-generated feedback for pedagogical quality, timing, and learning impact. Use when building or reviewing automated feedback in digital learning tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

standR is an user-friendly R package providing functions to assist conducting good-practice analysis of Nanostring's GeoMX DSP data. All functions in the package are built based on the SpatialExperiment object, allowing integration into various spatial transcriptomics-related packages from Bioconductor. standR allows data inspection, quality control, normalization, batch correction and evaluation with informative visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filter degenerate, uninformative inputs before statistical tests: single-sequence alignments, empty files, constant features, zero-variance inputs, all-NaN columns. See nan-safe-correlation for NaN-aware correlation; statistical-analysis for test guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress-Cache-Retrieve for huge, repetitive array tool output (logs, scan results, time series, event streams) before it enters context. Keeps an informative sample — endpoints, anomalies/change-points, head/tail — drops the redundant rest to a local cache, and leaves a retrievable hash. Use when a tool returns a long uniform JSON array you must read but mostly skim, and the full set is one command away if needed. Lossy-but-recoverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs Bayesian clinical trials including Phase I dose-finding (BOIN, CRM, EWOC, mTPI-2), meta-analytic-predictive (MAP) priors with robust mixtures for external data borrowing, EXNEX for basket trials, hierarchical models for safety AE (Berry-Berry), Bayesian platform trials (I-SPY 2, GBM AGILE, REMAP-CAP), and posterior probability stopping rules. Covers FDA Bayesian Devices Guidance (2010), FDA Bayesian Methodology in Drugs Draft (January 2026), BOIN Fit-for-Purpose qualification (December 2021), and Project Optimus dose-optimisation. Use when designing dose-finding studies, platform trials, or sensitivity analyses with informative priors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects informative features for biomarker discovery using Boruta all-relevant selection, mRMR minimum redundancy, and LASSO regularization. Use when identifying biomarkers from high-dimensional omics data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Developmental Psychologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Psychologist judgment. Reasons from developmental trajectories, measurement invariance, and familial-environmental context through age-normed instruments (Bayley, WPPSI/WISC, CBCL, MacArthur-Bates CDI), false-belief and violation-of-expectation paradigms, and lme4/lavaan growth models while treating verbal-demand confounding of theory of mind, informative attrition, adult-normed task misapplication, and parent-versus-direct-assessment divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in live learning experiences - cohort-based courses, workshops, webinars, coaching sessions, and real-time facilitation. Covers designing for synchronous learning, building peer accountability, and creating transformative live experiences that self-paced courses can't match. Use when "cohort course, live course, workshop, webinar, group coaching, live session, cohort-based, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。