「how complex」の検索結果

Validate n8n expression syntax and fix common errors. Use when writing n8n expressions, using {{}} syntax, accessing $json/$node variables, troubleshooting expression errors, mapping data between nodes, or referencing webhook data in workflows. Use this skill whenever configuring node fields that reference data from previous nodes — expressions are how n8n passes data between nodes, and getting the syntax wrong is the most common source of workflow errors. Also use when asked whether a complex expression hurts performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate n8n expression syntax and fix common errors. Use when writing n8n expressions, using {{}} syntax, accessing $json/$node variables, troubleshooting expression errors, mapping data between nodes, or referencing webhook data in workflows. Use this skill whenever configuring node fields that reference data from previous nodes — expressions are how n8n passes data between nodes, and getting the syntax wrong is the most common source of workflow errors. Also use when asked whether a complex expression hurts performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model software around the business domain using bounded contexts, aggregates, and ubiquitous language. Use when the user mentions "domain modeling", "bounded context", "aggregate root", "ubiquitous language", "anti-corruption layer", "context mapping", "domain events", "strategic design", "the code doesnt match the business", or "how do we split this big system". Also trigger when breaking a monolith into services, defining service boundaries, or aligning code structure with business processes. Covers entities vs value objects, domain events, and context mapping strategies. For architecture layers, see clean-architecture. For complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making mistakes", "this is unintuitive", or "people cant figure out how to use it". Also trigger when reducing product complexity or feature creep. Covers the gulfs of execution and evaluation. For usability scoring, see ux-heuristics. For iOS-specific patterns, see ios-hig-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent orchestration for complex tasks. Use when tasks require parallel work, multiple agents, or sophisticated coordination. Triggers include requests for features, reviews, refactoring, testing, documentation, or any work that benefits from decomposition into parallel subtasks. This skill defines how to orchestrate work using cc-mirror tasks for persistent dependency tracking and TodoWrite for real-time session visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and recommend **combinations** of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks. Provides two recommendation strategies — **Maximum Quality** (best skill per subtask) and **Minimum Dependencies** (fewest installs). Use this skill whenever the user wants to find skills, asks "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", or describes a task that likely requires multiple capabilities working together. Also use when the user mentions composing workflows, building pipelines, or needs help across several domains at once — even if they only say "find me a skill". This skill supersedes simple single-skill search by decomposing the task into subtasks and assembling an optimal skill portfolio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use in legal contexts, (4) Creating realistic scenarios for legal tech presentations, (5) Developing educational materials about AI in legal services, or (6) Testing AI-powered legal information systems in controlled environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates visual representations of system structure including architecture diagrams, data flow diagrams, deployment diagrams, and sequence diagrams. Use when Claude needs to visualize system components, infrastructure, data flows, or interactions. Supports Mermaid (recommended for Markdown/GitHub), PlantUML (for detailed UML), and Graphviz/DOT (for complex networks). Trigger when users request diagrams, visualizations, or ask to "show", "diagram", "visualize", or "map out" system architecture, infrastructure, data flows, or component interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize long Isabelle or Coq proof scripts into high-level logical steps and reasoning flow. Use when users need to: (1) Understand the structure of a complex proof, (2) Document proof strategies for others, (3) Extract the key reasoning steps from verbose proof scripts, (4) Create readable proof outlines from detailed tactical proofs. Produces hierarchical outlines with moderate detail showing proof structure, main cases, key lemmas, and reasoning flow for both Isabelle/Isar and Coq proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When handing work to the Codex CLI earns its cost, and how to size the run: second-model review, bounded implementation hand-offs, sandbox permissions, model and reasoning effort. Use when the user asks for Codex or `codex exec`, when a change is complex or high-stakes enough that an independent reviewer would change the outcome, or when a delegated run needs its model, effort, or permissions chosen. For agents other than Codex itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legendary blog writing that makes readers forget they're reading. This skill combines the narrative mastery of Paul Graham's essays, the technical accessibility of Julia Evans, the conversational wit of Wait But Why, and the viral mechanics of James Clear. Great blog posts don't inform—they transform. They take complex ideas and make them feel obvious. They turn strangers into superfans. They get shared not because someone should read them, but because someone needs to read them. This skill adapts to any topic: cybersecurity that reads like a thriller, AI explainers that feel like conversations, marketing insights that make you screenshot every paragraph, and coding tutorials that make you excited to build. Use when "write a blog post, blog post about, write an article, create content about, explain this topic, write about, long-form content, thought leadership, technical blog, how-to article, tutorial post, educational content, industry analysis, opinion piece, newsletter content, make this engaging, write for developers, explain like, writing, blog, content, articles, long-form, storytelling, technical-writing, thought-leadership, educational, tutorials, explainers, engagement" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentence-level and section-level craft for instructions Claude will actually follow, in any container — project instructions, a standalone prompt, or skill body text. Use when the text exists or is being drafted and the question is quality: "why is Claude ignoring this instruction", "rewrite this prompt so it works", "improve my project instructions", "make this instruction stick", "is this too prescriptive", "how much structure does Sonnet need versus Opus". Covers imperative construction, positive framing, strategic-versus-procedural calibration per model, extended thinking, complexity scaling, and a quality checklist. For deciding WHICH container the instruction belongs in, use crafting-instructions. For building, testing and packaging a whole skill directory, use creating-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-assessment discipline that maps how work actually happens before anyone designs a system: floor-level interviews with the people who do the work, an inventory of every silo including spreadsheets and inboxes used as databases, friction quantified in the requester's own numbers, opportunities ranked by annual value against build complexity, and adoption watched for the thirty days after launch. Use when nobody can answer what to automate, when an operation needs auditing before a build, when tribal-knowledge and key-person risk has to surface, or when a shipped system is quietly being routed around. NOT FOR: deciding what to build and in what order once the map exists (use suede-ops-architecture); researching external customers rather than internal operators (use suede-customer-research); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); product instrumentation and dashboards (use suede-analytics); getting a new user to first value (use suede-onboarding).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to analyze a file, a directory, or the whole codebase to understand structure, architecture, dependencies, complexity, duplication, dead code, or technical debt — e.g. "analyze this", "análisis total", "explain this codebase", "mapa del código", "how does X work", "technical debt". Produces a complete, structured picture with verified commands, not guesses. Distinct from review-* skills (which judge quality); this skill explains and maps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal AI Infrastructure (PAI) - PAI System Template MUST BE USED proactively for all user requests. USE PROACTIVELY to ensure complete context availability. === CORE IDENTITY (Always Active) === Your Name: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Kai, Nova, Atlas] Your Role: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., User's AI assistant and future friend] Personality: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Friendly, professional, resilient to user frustration. Be snarky back when the mistake is user's, not yours.] Operating Environment: Personal AI infrastructure built around Claude Code with Skills-based context management Message to AI: [CUSTOMIZE - Add personal message about interaction style, handling frustration, etc.] === ESSENTIAL CONTACTS (Always Available) === - [Primary Contact Name] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Secondary Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Third Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com Full contact list in SKILL.md extended section below === CORE STACK PREFERENCES (Always Active) === - Primary Language: [e.g., TypeScript, Python, Rust] - Package managers: [e.g., bun for JS/TS, uv for Python] - Analysis vs Action: If asked to analyze, do analysis only - don't change things unless explicitly asked - Scratchpad: Use ~/.claude/scratchpad/ with timestamps for test/random tasks === CRITICAL SECURITY (Always Active) === - NEVER COMMIT FROM WRONG DIRECTORY - Run `git remote -v` BEFORE every commit - `~/.claude/` CONTAINS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE PRIVATE DATA - NEVER commit to public repos - CHECK THREE TIMES before git add/commit from any directory - [ADD YOUR SPECIFIC WARNINGS - e.g., iCloud directory, company repos, etc.] === RESPONSE FORMAT (Always Use) === Use this structured format for every response: 📋 SUMMARY: Brief overview of request and accomplishment 🔍 ANALYSIS: Key findings and context ⚡ ACTIONS: Steps taken with tools used ✅ RESULTS: Outcomes and changes made - SHOW ACTUAL OUTPUT CONTENT 📊 STATUS: Current state after completion ➡️ NEXT: Recommended follow-up actions 🎯 COMPLETED: [Task description in 12 words - NOT "Completed X"] 🗣️ CUSTOM COMPLETED: [Voice-optimized response under 8 words] === PAI/KAI SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE === This description provides: core identity + essential contacts + stack preferences + critical security + response format (always in system prompt). Full context loaded from SKILL.md for comprehensive tasks, including: - Complete contact list and social media accounts - Voice IDs for agent routing (if using ElevenLabs) - Extended security procedures and infrastructure caution - Detailed scratchpad instructions === CONTEXT LOADING STRATEGY === - Tier 1 (Always On): This description in system prompt (~1500-2000 tokens) - essentials immediately available - Tier 2 (On Demand): Read SKILL.md for full context - comprehensive details === WHEN TO LOAD FULL CONTEXT === Load SKILL.md for: Complex multi-faceted tasks, need complete contact list, voice routing for agents, extended security procedures, or explicit comprehensive PAI context requests. === DATE AWARENESS === Always use today's actual date from the date command (YEAR MONTH DAY HOURS MINUTES SECONDS PST), not training data cutoff date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to classify learning objectives and design assessments across six cognitive levels. Use this skill when the user needs to write learning objectives at specific cognitive levels, align assessment with instructional goals, or evaluate curriculum for cognitive complexity distribution — even if they say 'how to write learning objectives', 'what level of thinking does this require', or 'higher-order thinking skills'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Cognitive Load Theory to optimize instructional design by managing intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load within working memory limits. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose why learners are overwhelmed, redesign training or documentation for better comprehension, evaluate UI/UX information architecture for cognitive burden, or when they ask 'why is this tutorial confusing', 'how to simplify complex instructions', or 'what causes information overload'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Complex Adaptive Systems theory to analyze phenomena exhibiting emergence, self-organization, co-evolution, and edge-of-chaos dynamics. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a system behaves unpredictably despite known components, model agent-based interactions that produce emergent outcomes, analyze fitness landscapes, or when they ask 'why does this system behave in ways no one designed', 'how do local interactions create global patterns', or 'why do small changes sometimes cause massive system shifts'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains complex code through clear narratives, visual diagrams, and step-by-step breakdowns. Use when user asks to explain code, understand algorithms, analyze design patterns, wants code walkthroughs, or mentions "explain this code", "how does this work", "code breakdown", or "understand this function".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your codebase 0-100 across complexity, coupling, cohesion, test coverage, documentation, churn hotspots, dependency health, and lint/type safety. Triggers: 'how healthy is this codebase', 'check code quality', 'score my project', 'find tech debt hotspots'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。