「implementation」の検索結果

Validates cryptographic implementations against Project Wycheproof's test vectors, which encode known attacks and edge cases across AES, RSA, ECDSA, ECDH, and more. Covers loading test vectors, mapping result flags onto pass and fail expectations, and reading a failure. Use when testing a crypto implementation against known attacks, checking a library against standard test vectors, or investigating why two implementations disagree on the same input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch dependency source code to give AI agents deeper implementation context. Use when the agent needs to understand how a library works internally, read source code for a package, fetch implementation details for a dependency, or explore how an npm/PyPI/crates.io package is built. Triggers include "fetch source for", "read the source of", "how does X work internally", "get the implementation of", "opensrc path", or any task requiring access to dependency source code beyond types and docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Takes a new customer from signature to working — setting a definition of live that both sides agreed before the contract was signed, planning and staffing the implementation, running data migration and integration realistically, training the people who will actually use it, and handing over to the ongoing relationship. Use this to design an onboarding motion, rescue a stalled implementation, work out why customers who bought never went live, or scope the services a deal actually needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Analyze and simplify existing implementations to reduce complexity, improve maintainability, and enhance scalability. Use when users ask to simplify code, reduce complexity, refactor for readability, clean up implementations, improve maintainability, reduce technical debt, or make code easier to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an arxiv paper into a minimal, citation-anchored Python implementation. Trigger when user runs /paper2code with an arxiv URL or paper ID, says "implement this paper", or pastes an arxiv link asking for implementation. Flags all ambiguities honestly. Never invents implementation details not stated in the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create if-then implementation intentions and WOOP plans for specific student behaviour change goals. Use when students know what to do but struggle to follow through on habits or routines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An implementation, which takes input data and makes it available for proper batch effect removal by ComBat or Limma. The implementation appropriately handles missing values by dissecting the input matrix into smaller matrices with sufficient data to feed the ComBat or limma algorithm. The adjusted data is returned to the user as a rebuild matrix. The implementation is meant to make as much data available as possible with minimal data loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate protocol/interface test suites that any implementation must pass. Define the contract once, test every implementation. Use when designing protocols or swapping implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestrator that generates all implementation specs (PRD, Architecture, UX, Implementation, Test, Release) from product plan. Use when generating complete specification package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates detailed implementation guide with pseudo-code and step-by-step development instructions. Creates IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md from PRD, Architecture, and UX specs. Use when creating development roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to "finalize implementation", "finalize changes", "wrap up implementation", "finish up", "ready to commit", or "run QA workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an implementation plan at .turbo/plans/<slug>.md. Use when the user asks to "draft a plan", "draft the plan", "write an implementation plan", "plan this change", "create an implementation plan", or needs a first-draft plan file before refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive feature development workflow from idea to implementation. Creates requirements (EARS format), design documents, and implementation task lists. Use when creating feature specs, requirements documents, design documents, or implementation plans. Triggered by "kiro" or references to .kiro/specs/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. All plans MUST be validated using the included validation script. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates phased, dependency-ordered implementation tasks from specifications. Use after spec is complete and before starting implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy law change monitoring and impact assessment for multi-jurisdiction organisations. Covers regulatory tracking sources, change classification, impact scoring methodology, and implementation prioritisation. Keywords: law monitoring, regulatory tracking, change management, impact assessment, implementation priority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of gap analysis findings into phased implementation plans with milestones and risk-based prioritisation. Activate when building compliance programmes or allocating privacy budgets. Keywords: remediation roadmap, implementation plan, phased approach, prioritisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform the repository's risk-tiered independent final review before implementation completion. Use only when explicitly invoked or when repository instructions require it after behavior-impacting implementation work; audit the complete task diff, supported contracts, lifecycle and security boundaries, complexity, and tests before final verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start and carry an explicitly invoked openai-guardrails-python implementation through a fresh isolated worktree and a local PR-ready handoff. Fetch the latest origin/main, keep task changes uncommitted, replay them onto the latest main before final review, run applicable verification and $implementation-final-review, use $pr-draft-summary to generate the complete PR draft and branch name, then create one clean local commit with takeover provenance when applicable. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill; never push, open a PR, or mutate GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds traceability matrices connecting requirements to design documents to source code implementation, tracking the complete development lifecycle. Use when you need to verify implementation completeness, ensure all requirements are implemented in code, generate compliance documentation, audit requirement coverage, identify orphaned code, or create traceability reports for stakeholders. Supports parsing requirements from Markdown, Word, and PDFs; extracting design from architecture docs and API specs; and scanning source code for implementations. Outputs to Markdown tables, Excel/CSV, and HTML visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review slo implementation work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests slo implementation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。