568 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review a user-provided Chinese mathematical-modeling abstract without requiring the problem statement or full paper, identify concrete writing defects, and prioritize revisions. Use when the user asks to check, diagnose, or improve a modeling-paper abstract; do not claim coverage or factual consistency that cannot be verified without the problem or paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the symbol-notation section of a mathematical-modeling paper against the full paper. Check table coverage, symbol meanings, units, overloading, case and subscript consistency, first-use definitions, formula usage, and visible table formatting. Use for symbol-table diagnosis, not general paper review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the bundled BZD mathematical-modeling dictionary for a user-selected model, explain its assumptions, inputs, outputs, limitations and validation, then judge whether it fits the current competition problem and data. Use when a user asks whether a proposed model is appropriate, requests model feasibility review, or wants dictionary-based alternatives for a modeling task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a mathematical-modeling paper's model-assumption section against the complete problem statement. Diagnose whether each assumption is necessary, evidence-based, compatible with the task, appropriately simplified, and usable by the later model. Use for assumption review, not automatic full-paper review or unsupported assumption generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; do not replace technical model correctness review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check a mathematical-modeling paper's in-text citations, bibliography, appendix length and content, code, supporting files, reproducibility, consistency, and anonymity. Use when the user provides a paper or related materials and wants one consolidated P0-P3 audit; do not generate or invent missing sources or programs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate a complete mathematical modeling contest problem sentence by sentence into precise modeling language, preserve every substantive condition and definition, expose hidden constraints, draw a mandatory Mermaid cross-question flowchart, audit omissions, and deliver one easy-to-open Markdown report. For Huawei Cup (CPGMCM) graduate-contest problems, additionally prepend a plain-language layer that rewrites the background and questions as a primary-school word problem with a mandatory term-mapping table. Optionally render the finished report as one standalone HTML page on request. Use whenever a user supplies a CUMCM, CPGMCM, or other modeling problem and asks to interpret, translate, unpack, read closely, identify requirements, or avoid missing details before modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the BZD mathematical-modeling Skills across problem reading, idea generation, model selection, paper drafting, section checks, final format/AIGC audits and judge-style scoring. Use when a user wants one entry point, an end-to-end competition workflow, the next appropriate Skill, or coordinated processing of a problem and paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-analysis section against the original problem, checking task classification, data reasoning, cross-problem linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. Use for diagnosis, not automatic full rewriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数学建模竞赛论文写作全流程指导。覆盖国赛(CUMCM)和美赛(MCM/ICM)，从论文结构规划、各章节撰写、模型检验、参考文献规范到最终格式检查。与math-modeling-solver形成"解题→写作"配对——可接收solver输出的论文草稿片段直接展开写作。当用户提及数学建模论文写作、建模比赛、国赛/美赛/电工杯/亚太杯/深圳杯/华为杯论文、CUMCM、MCM/ICM、数模论文结构、摘要写作、模型检验、灵敏度分析、latex建模模板、word建模排版、Memo/Letter写作、模型命名、Our Work流程图，或需要写/修改/优化/检查建模论文的任何部分时，都必须使用此 skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数学建模竞赛解题全流程指导。覆盖国赛(CUMCM)和美赛(MCM/ICM)全部题型(A-F)，提供12种问题本质分析、95+场景模型决策矩阵、5本算法Cookbook、11本完整例题Playbook、22个Python+7个MATLAB可运行代码模板。与math-modeling-paper形成"解题→写作"配对。当用户提及建模思路、选什么模型、怎么建模、赛题求解、粘贴赛题文本、美赛/国赛题目分析、CVaR/NSGA-II/Monte Carlo/时间序列/ANOVA/灰色关联、网络流/图论/生态建模、模型命名/Memo/Letter/Our Work流程图时，使用此skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing mathematical validity, evidence, reproducibility, figures or a submission draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plugin shim for the mathmodel-skill competition workflow. Use when Codex invokes this plugin for a CUMCM, MCM/ICM, or Diangong Cup modeling-contest task, including problem selection, modeling, robustness, contest-paper writing, compliance, or final submission review. Do not use for generic data analysis or non-competition paper review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Modeler. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Modeler judgment. Reasons from nondimensionalization, conservation/positivity laws, and minimal-viable model structure through mechanistic ODE/PDE, stochastic, and agent-based formulations, profile-likelihood and Fisher-information identifiability, and Sobol/Morris sensitivity analysis, while treating sloppy unidentifiable parameters, structural model uncertainty, and out-of-regime extrapolation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Statistician. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Statistician judgment. Reasons from LAN, empirical processes, and influence functions; proves M/Z-estimator limits, minimax rates (Fano/Le Cam/Assouad), and semiparametric efficiency while validating with ADEMP simulations and treating naive bootstrap, non-Donsker classes, and debiasing sparsity violations as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Analyst. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Analyst judgment. Reasons from function-space topology, convergence modes, and constant-dependent inequalities (Hölder, Sobolev, Gronwall) through compactness theorems (Rellich-Kondrachov, Banach-Alaoglu), Calderon-Zygmund and Schauder estimates, and Lax-Milgram while treating limit-integral swaps without dominated convergence, boundary-degenerating constants, weak-versus-classical regularity gaps, and concentration-compactness loss as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Applied Mathematician. Use when a task calls for Applied Mathematician judgment. Reasons from formulation-first modeling, Buckingham scaling, and asymptotics (matched expansions, boundary layers) through FEM/FVM numerics (FEniCS, PETSc, LAPACK), Tikhonov inverse problems, and ASME/Sandia V&V while treating ill-posed inversion, stiffness, and numerical diffusion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM mathematical modeling work needs lightweight reusable paper assets, national-prize style paragraph templates, section controls, per-question code/plot/test scaffolds, evidence registries, paper fragments, reproduction scripts, or safe reuse of prior contest project structure without copying old problem-specific content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM mathematical modeling papers need lightweight literature search, citation verification, method/background references, standards or policy sources, Chinese-English source routing, DOI/BibTeX checks, or claim-to-citation mapping without fabricated sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when solving CUMCM, MCM, ICM, or other mathematical modeling tasks that need contest problem intake, model selection, Python solving, figures, paper writing, quality audit, and packaged deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。