「maturity」の検索結果

Expert en transformation digitale (strategy, change management, technology adoption, maturity assessment)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Build and operate a Busabase-backed mainland China A-share strategy experiment desk with a bundled local Hono App-in-Skill, evidence-backed strategy research, strategy-level L1/L2/L3 manual maturity approvals, one CNY virtual ledger per strategy, and dated strategy backtest reports. Use when the user invokes $kelly-invest-stock or /kelly-invest-stock, wants to define or compare A-share strategies, inspect a strategy and its virtual book, record research evidence, manually approve strategy maturity, or review dated backtests, drawdown, and contribution to the total book. It never connects to a brokerage, places orders, moves money, or presents generated analysis as personalized investment advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang library and framework selection — vetted production-ready options by category (web, database, testing, logging, messaging), new and experimental stdlib packages, standard-library-first tradeoffs, and maturity signals (maintenance, license, importer counts). Apply when the user asks for library suggestions, wants to compare alternatives, needs to choose a library for a specific task, or when a new dependency is being added to the project. Not for a specific library's API once chosen (→ See that library's dedicated skill, e.g. `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-lo`), nor for go.mod mechanics, upgrades, or vulnerability audits (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our social presence" or "is this batch safe to publish"; runs either the typed ECHO asset gate or a separate program-maturity profile, with channel-truth, claim, disclosure, manipulation, UGC-rights, and denominator checks. Not for creator deliverables — use creator-content-auditor; not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor. 社媒资产门/运营成熟度/发布前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. Always map what is biologically supported, what is druggable, what has actually advanced, and what remains strategically open. Never confuse target relevance with druggability, preclinical activity with clinical promise, or narrative excitement with validated development maturity. Never fabricate references, trial status, approval status, company activity, or asset metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users transition from individual execution to a coaching-centric leadership style that scales through the growth of their team. It focuses on identifying skill deficits, providing reflection space, and leveraging frameworks to accelerate professional maturity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3, DoD cybersecurity compliance, NIST SP 800-171, CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) protection, System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), C3PAO assessments, DIBCAC audits, self-assessment, SPRS score, or any requirement under DFARS 252.204-7012 or 7021. Also trigger for: "CMMC gap analysis", "CMMC readiness", "FCI protection", "CUI scoping", "CMMC practices", "DoD contract cybersecurity", "defense supply chain security", "prime contractor flow-down requirements", the July 2026 CMMC Phase 2 suspension, or the CMMC Reform Task Force.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) advisor for the automotive supply chain — the ENX/VDA assessment regime that OEMs like VW, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz require from suppliers and service providers. Covers the VDA ISA 6 catalogue (current through 2026) and the ISA2027 transition (published July 1, 2026; mandatory for assessments ordered from January 1, 2027), assessment levels AL1/AL2/AL3, all 12 assessment objectives/labels (Confidential, Strictly Confidential, High/Very High Availability, Proto Parts/Vehicles, Test Vehicles, Proto Events, Data, Special Data), maturity scoring (0–5, target 3, cutback rules), the ENX portal process, scoping, audit-provider selection, corrective action plans and the 9-month window, 3-year label validity, and ISO 27001 mapping. Use for any TISAX, VDA ISA, ENX, automotive information-security assessment, prototype protection, or OEM supplier-security requirement question — gap assessments, label selection, readiness, and audit prep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert agile coaching: framework selection, maturity assessment, retrospective facilitation, transformation roadmaps. Use when selecting an agile framework, coaching teams, facilitating retrospectives, or designing a transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chaos engineering: hypothesis-driven fault injection to surface weakness before users do. Use when designing a chaos experiment, planning a gameday, choosing what to inject, computing blast radius, or building a chaos maturity model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data leadership advisor on data strategy, governance, quality, and platform decisions. Use when defining a data strategy, scoring data maturity, auditing data governance, evaluating a data platform, or designing the data org.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI leadership advisor on AI strategy, governance, risk, investment, and org design. Use when defining an AI strategy, building an AI governance program, scoring AI maturity, or drafting an AI risk register.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customer leadership advisor on CX strategy, retention and expansion, and voice-of-customer programs. Use when defining a CX strategy, scoring CX maturity, planning churn interventions, or designing a VoC program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIS2 Compliance Navigator — scope classification, Art. 21 gap analysis (0-4 maturity scoring), and compliance roadmap under EU Directive 2022/2555 with deep German BSIG-neu coverage and profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Spain. Use when: (1) User mentions "NIS2", "NIS-2", "BSIG", "BSIG-neu", "NIS2UmsuCG", "Cyberbeveiligingswet", "Loi Résilience", "NISG", "decreto legislativo 138", (2) User asks if their organization falls under NIS2 or needs a cybersecurity compliance assessment, (3) User mentions essential/important entities, Annex I/II, BSI registration, § 30 BSIG, incident reporting, management body liability, supply chain security, (4) User wants a NIS2 gap analysis, readiness assessment, or compliance roadmap, (5) User asks about NIS2 fines, enforcement, or Nachweispflicht, (6) User asks about NIS2 in any EU Member State.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。