379 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
State-space model with O(n) complexity vs Transformers' O(n²). 5× faster inference, million-token sequences, no KV cache. Selective SSM with hardware-aware design. Mamba-1 (d_state=16) and Mamba-2 (d_state=128, multi-head). Models 130M-2.8B on HuggingFace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats or abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do NOT use for general architecture summaries, code review, security best practices (use security-best-practices), or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Claude API reference architectures for common use cases. Use when designing a Claude-powered application, choosing between direct API vs queue-based, or planning a multi-model architecture. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic architecture", "claude system design", "anthropic reference architecture", "design claude integration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model and document existing or planned software architectures with the C4 model across System Context, Container, and Component levels plus deployment diagrams, then emit diagrams through a selected renderer. Use when an architect needs audience-appropriate software architecture documentation; use the 'architecture-diagrams' skill for infrastructure topology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model, simulate, and optimize Serializer/Deserializer (SerDes) systems — serial and parallel links — using MATLAB SerDes Toolbox. Design NRZ and PAM-N links (PAM3 through PAM16) — explore equalization architectures (FFE, CTLE, DFE), sweep or optimize parameters with genetic algorithms, and characterize channels from loss models, S-parameter files, or crosstalk scenarios. Process captured waveforms through equalization chains, build eye diagrams, and decompose jitter. Deliver IBIS-AMI models for Tx, Rx, Redriver, or Retimer by exporting to Simulink and compiling .ami/.ibs/.dll/.so files. Covers the full arc from initial design exploration and parameter optimization to compliance testing and compiled model validation, including custom datapath blocks for nonstandard equalization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates technical architecture specification from PRD. Covers architecture pattern, tech stack, data models, and app structure. Use when creating ARCHITECTURE.md or designing system architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured threat-modeling session for a new feature, system, or architecture — STRIDE, attack trees, data flow diagrams, abuse cases. Use when the user mentions 'threat model,' 'threat modeling,' 'STRIDE,' 'attack tree,' 'abuse case,' 'data flow diagram,' 'DFD,' 'security architecture review,' 'security review,' 'design review,' 'pre-implementation security,' 'shift left,' 'what could go wrong,' or needs strategic security thinking before code is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define implementation contracts (APIs and data models) that developers will build against during PRD v0.6 Architecture. Triggers on requests to define APIs, design database schema, create data models, or when user asks "define APIs", "data model", "database schema", "API contracts", "technical spec", "endpoint design", "schema design". Consumes ARC- (architecture), TECH- (Build items), UJ- (flows), SCR- (screens). Outputs API- entries for endpoints and DBT- entries for data models. Feeds v0.7 Build Execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数据工程 — 数据平台从业者的认知操作系统, 覆盖把数据从源系统搬运成可靠 / 可查询 / 可信赖形态供分析 / ML / 数据产品消费的全生命周期 (生成 → 摄取 → 存储 → 转换 → 服务 + 安全/数据管理/DataOps/数据架构/编排/软件工程 六条暗流, Reis & Housley 框架): 摄取与集成 (批 + CDC 变更数据捕获 Debezium + EL 工具 Fivetran/Airbyte/Meltano/dlt + Kafka Connect + schema drift) / 存储与文件表格式 (对象存储数据湖 + 列存 Parquet/ORC/Arrow/Avro + 开放表格式 Apache Iceberg/Delta Lake/Apache Hudi + lakehouse + 分区/compaction) / 转换与建模 (ELT dbt/SQLMesh + Spark + 维度建模 Kimball + Inmon + Data Vault + 大宽表 OBT + 渐变维 SCD + 增量模型 + 语义/指标层) / 编排与工作流 (Apache Airflow/Dagster/Prefect/Mage/Kestra/Apache DolphinScheduler + DAG + 幂等 + 回填 backfill + 数据资产调度) / 批流与实时 (Apache Kafka/Apache Flink/Spark Structured Streaming/Kinesis/Pulsar/Redpanda + Lambda vs Kappa + watermark/窗口/exactly-once + 流式 SQL Materialize/RisingWave + 实时 OLAP ClickHouse/Apache Druid/Apache Pinot/StarRocks/Apache Doris) / 数仓与查询引擎 (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift/Databricks SQL/Trino/Presto/DuckDB/Polars + 存算分离 + MPP) / 数据质量测试与可观测性 (dbt tests/Great Expectations/Soda + 数据契约 + Monte Carlo data downtime + 新鲜度/量/schema 异常检测) / 数据治理编目与血缘 (DataHub/Amundsen/OpenMetadata/Unity Catalog + 列级血缘 + PII 分类 + 访问控制 + GDPR) / DataOps 与可靠性 (数据 CI/CD + 转换版本控制 + 环境隔离 + 幂等重处理 + 数据 SLA/SLO + 计算存储 FinOps) / 数据架构范式 (现代数据栈 + lakehouse + data mesh + data fabric + 去中心化 vs 中心化所有权) / 分析工程角色 (dbt 时代连接数据工程与分析的桥) — 不含 数据科学/ML 建模本身 (是下游消费者) / BI 仪表盘制作 (serving 下游) / 数据分析报表为终点 / 'data engineer = 跑 Hadoop 的' 过时窄化 / 通用后端应用开发 (平行学科) (Data Engineering — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design, build, and operate the data platform: moving data from source systems into reliable, queryable, trustworthy form for analytics / ML / products, covering (a) the data engineering lifecycle (generation → ingestion → storage → transformation → serving, with the undercurrents security / data management / DataOps / data architecture / orchestration / software engineering — Reis & Housley framing), (b) ingestion & integration (batch + CDC change-data-capture with Debezium, EL tools Fivetran / Airbyte / Meltano / dlt, Kafka Connect, API + file + database sources, schema drift handling), (c) storage & file/table formats (object storage data lakes, columnar formats Parquet / ORC / Arrow / Avro, open table formats Apache Iceberg / Delta Lake / Apache Hudi, lakehouse architecture, partitioning / compaction / Z-ordering), (d) transformation & modeling (ELT with dbt / SQLMesh, Spark, dimensional modeling Kimball, Inmon CIF, Data Vault, One Big Table / wide tables, normalization vs denormalization, slowly changing dimensions, incremental models, the semantic / metrics layer), (e) orchestration & workflow (Apache Airflow, Dagster, Prefect, Mage, Kestra, Apache DolphinScheduler, DAGs, idempotency, backfills, data-aware / asset-based scheduling), (f) batch vs streaming & real-time (Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, Kinesis / Pulsar / Redpanda, the Lambda vs Kappa debate, watermarks / windowing / exactly-once, streaming SQL Materialize / RisingWave, real-time OLAP ClickHouse / Apache Druid / Apache Pinot / StarRocks / Apache Doris), (g) warehouses & query engines (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks SQL, Trino / Presto, DuckDB, Polars, decoupled storage & compute, MPP), (h) data quality, testing & observability (dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, data contracts, Monte Carlo / data downtime, freshness / volume / schema anomaly detection, unit / integration testing of pipelines), (i) data governance, catalog & lineage (DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog, column-level lineage, PII / data classification, access control, GDPR / data privacy), (j) DataOps & reliability (CI/CD for data, version control of transformations, environments, idempotent reprocessing, SLAs / SLOs for data, cost / FinOps for compute & storage), (k) data architecture paradigms (modern data stack, data lakehouse, data mesh, data fabric, decentralized vs centralized ownership), (l) the analytics engineering role (the dbt-era bridge between data engineering and analysis); N
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for integrating Large Language Models (LLMs), Model Context Protocol (MCP v1.x), hybrid reasoning models, RAG architecture, vector databases, and AI agents / Panduan ahli untuk integrasi LLM, Model Context Protocol (MCP), model hybrid reasoning, arsitektur RAG, vector database, dan agen AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding support for a new model architecture to imp, porting a model family, or debugging a model that loads but produces wrong output - "add support for <model>", "new arch", loader detection, chat template, tokenizer parity, RoPE variant, "outputs garbage", "prompt-blind", "digits scrambled", "NaN logits", "describes a different picture", "does it fit in VRAM". Do NOT use for kernel performance (sm120-cuda-expert) or quant-format questions (quant-formats).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, review, and debug agent workflows, and decide when a request should use a prompt, instruction, skill, agent, or hook before escalating to multi-agent design. Use for .agent.md / .instructions.md / .prompt.md / AGENTS.md work, workflow architecture, orchestration planning, scheduled automation model allocation, or when agent workflows may be overkill. Triggers on 'agent workflow', 'create agent', 'automation models', 'ワークフロー設計', 'orchestrator'.
Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modelo de espaço de estados com complexidade O(n) versus O(n²) dos Transformers. Inferência 5× mais rápida, sequências de milhão de tokens, sem cache KV. SSM seletivo com design aware de hardware. Mamba-1 (d_state=16) e Mamba-2 (d_state=128, multi-head). Modelos 130M-2.8B no HuggingFace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, evaluating, documenting, modernizing, reviewing, refactoring, or implementing software architecture and code-level structure, including requirements, context, architecture style selection, microservices patterns, WebAssembly/WASI/Component Model, UMA portable capabilities, runtime contracts, capability graphs, governed MCP/agent orchestration, clean code, code smells, Rust crate/library API architecture, Cargo feature/MSRV/SemVer policy, unsafe/FFI/no_std/library testing, modularity, views, NFR tactics, IAM/auth, security patterns, cost estimation, architecture-as-code fitness functions, ADR/RFC work, and engineering execution plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hermes Agent CLI リファレンス。 インストール、CLI コマンド (chat, model, gateway, config, skills, cron, webhook, mcp, profile)、 Configuration (Terminal Backends, Memory, TTS / STT, Compression, Display, Auxiliary Models)、 Features (Tools, Skills, MCP, Memory, Voice Mode, Personality, Context Files)、 Messaging Gateway (14+ プラットフォーム)、Security、Architecture、 Platform Support、Nous Portal 連携 (Tool Gateway)。
有馬記念分析システムのアーキテクチャ/レイヤー境界レビュー。docs/ARCHITECTURE.md のレイヤー構成（commands / domain / repositories / models / features / constants / database / utils / types）に対し、レイヤーディレクトリの意味と配置、参照系(queries)と更新系(aggregates)の分離、DB 接続の注入可能性とテスト容易性、リッチドメインモデルの維持（commands 肥大・ドメイン貧血症）、重み・閾値の constants 単一定義、ファイル配置と命名語彙の一致、不要な抽象化、種別分岐のポリモーフィズム化、生成引数の凝集（5個以上は分割シグナル）を検証。純粋性・依存方向の逆流・DB 接続の生成箇所は lint が error で担保するため扱わない。Use when user says 'アーキテクチャレビュー', 'レイヤー境界チェック', 'review architecture', or '依存方向の確認'.
Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。