「ols」の検索結果

Read this skill before the first step that uses Claude in Chrome, the browser extension whose tools are named mcp__claude-in-chrome__* (also called Chrome, the browser extension, or the external browser) and which acts in the person's real Chrome with their own sign-ins; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__claude-in-chrome tool instead. It covers loading the tools in one ToolSearch call, checking the person's open tabs and working in a new tab, site permissions, GIF recordings, console logs, dialogs to avoid, and when to stop and ask. It is not for the built-in browser (mcp__Claude_Browser__* or mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: User wants to extend Docker with custom tools, personalize the Docker environment, or set up user-specific Docker customization. Triggers: 'extend docker', 'docker-extend', 'add tools to docker', 'customize docker', 'add my tools to the container', 'personalize docker setup', 'docker user setup', 'install tools in docker'. Does: Interactively sets up Dockerfile.user and docker-compose.override.yml so users can add personal tools to their Docker environment without affecting maintainer files or committing user-specific config to git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, validates, and safely exports protocols.io data with current official REST/MCP contracts, or creates non-executing mutation plans. The bundled client makes bounded official-host GET requests only with explicit --execute. Use only for tasks explicitly targeting protocols.io or an exact protocols.io protocol version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect Vue Table v9 refs or instances to Devtools with tableDevtoolsPlugin and useTanStackTableDevtools. Load for missing targets, reactive table replacement, required options.key, enabled state, cleanup, or development gating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect native Preact Table v9 instances to Devtools with tableDevtoolsPlugin and useTanStackTableDevtools. Load for React-package mixups, missing targets, required options.key, enabled state, cleanup, or development gating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect React Table v9 instances to Devtools with tableDevtoolsPlugin and useTanStackTableDevtools. Load for missing Table panels, registration lifecycle, required options.key, enabled state, or development versus explicit production exports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect Solid Table v9 instances to Devtools with tableDevtoolsPlugin and useTanStackTableDevtools in the proper reactive owner. Load for missing targets, required options.key, enabled state, cleanup, or development versus explicit production exports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and call the tools a connected integration exposes, such as Linear, GitHub, Sentry, or Notion, through `superset mcp`. Use when the user wants something done in a connected service, asks what an integration can do or which tools it has, wants a specific tool called, asks why an integration's tools are failing, or when another skill expects `mcp__linear__*`-style tools that are not in your tool list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers — tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions and results, unscoped/over-privileged tools, path traversal in file tools, command injection in shell/exec tools, SSRF in fetch tools, secret leakage through tool output, missing approval gates on state-changing actions, confused-deputy and rug-pull tool redefinition, token passthrough, and unsafe stdio/HTTP transport config. Covers auditing both first-party and third-party MCP servers (Python FastMCP, Node MCP SDK) and their client configs (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Zed). Use when reviewing, hardening, or hunting bugs in an MCP server, an agent's tool integrations, or a mcpServers config block. 中文触发词：MCP审计、工具投毒、提示注入、智能体安全、MCP服务器漏洞

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns Hi-C/Micro-C FASTQ into a deduplicated, filtered .pairs file with pairtools and decides whether the library worked. Covers the bwa mem -SP5M / bwa-mem2 / chromap --preset hic alignment idiom (mates mapped as independent single-end reads), pairtools parse vs parse2 and the walks-policy choice (5unique pairwise vs all for Pore-C/Micro-C concatemers), pair-type classification (keep UU and rescued UC), dedup (PCR vs optical/by-tile), select by pair_type/MAPQ/distance, restriction-fragment handling (restrict, Arima dual-enzyme, Micro-C/DNase fragment-free), and allele-specific phasing (pairtools phase to two coolers). The library-QC decision uses % long-range cis as the one-number quality metric, trans as the noise floor, orientation balance as fragment-map-free dangling-end/self-circle QC, and % duplicates as a complexity proxy. Use when processing Hi-C/Micro-C/Omni-C reads into pairs, judging library quality, handling multi-enzyme or restriction-agnostic protocols, or generating allele-specific contacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (26 mandatory, 6 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review chrome devtools work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests chrome devtools work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master the AI tools that automate repetitive work and connect your tools. From simple Zapier integrations to complex AI-powered workflows, reclaim hours every week. Use when "automation, workflow, integrate tools, connect apps, zapier, no-code, automate process, rpa, automation, workflow, integration, no-code, zapier, make, rpa" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The orchestration layer for AI-native creative production. This skill coordinates multiple AI tools—video, image, audio, digital humans, effects—into cohesive campaigns, productions, and creative systems. As AI tools proliferate, the challenge shifts from "can we create this?" to "how do we orchestrate these capabilities into something coherent?" The AI Creative Director thinks in systems, not tools. In pipelines, not one-offs. In brand consistency across AI-generated assets. This is where creative vision meets technical orchestration. The AI Creative Director doesn't just use AI tools—they compose them into creative instruments that produce at scales and speeds previously impossible. Use when "AI creative director, orchestrate AI, AI campaign, multi-tool, AI workflow, AI pipeline, coordinate AI, AI production, AI creative system, full AI production, AI at scale, orchestration, creative-direction, ai-production, workflow, pipeline, multi-tool, scale, quality-control" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling. JSON Schema best practices, description writing that actually helps the LLM, validation, and the emerging MCP standard that's becoming the lingua franca for AI tools. Key insight: Tool descriptions are more important than tool implementations. The LLM never sees your code - it only sees the schema and description. Use when "agent tool, function calling, tool schema, tool design, mcp server, mcp tool, tool use, build tool for agent, define function, input_schema, tool_use, tool_result, agents, tools, function-calling, mcp, json-schema, anthropic, openai, llm-tools" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give an AI agent GitHub access via @github-tools/sdk. Mount as an eve extension, or use with the AI SDK, TanStack AI, Vercel Workflow, and Chat SDK. Covers tools, presets, approval control, token scoping, and durable agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal legal controls review — approval workflows, contract lifecycle, access to sensitive docs. Use when asked to "audit our controls", "review approval workflows", or "who can access sensitive contracts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a locally running site's WebMCP tools register and execute correctly. Use to verify WebMCP tools, confirm document.modelContext tools appear on the right pages and auth states, or test @nekuda/webmcp-sdk tools in a browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。