「oss」の検索結果

Research an issue deeply and present all context to the user. but the user writes the code. The LLM investigates code paths, finds relevant files, explains patterns, and identifies constraints. The user thinks through the approach and implements it. Use when ready to start working on an issue after oss-prep-to-contribute. Not for writing tests or documentation as a standalone contribution. Use oss-write-tests or oss-write-docs for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute your second and third contributions to become a regular contributor. Covers relationship building, progressive complexity escalation, and community presence. Use when your first PR was merged and you want to keep contributing, when transitioning from one-off contributor to regular, or when planning a sustained OSS involvement. Not for your first contribution — use the oss-find-issue → oss-contribute chain for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare to contribute to an open source repo. Reads all contribution docs, checks eligibility, assesses the user's knowledge gaps, and fills them before coding starts. Use after finding an issue with oss-find-issue, or when starting work on any OSS repo. Not for installing dependencies or getting the build and tests running. Use oss-setup-dev-env for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps implement coss UI components correctly. Use when building UIs with coss primitives (buttons, dialogs, selects, forms, menus, tabs, inputs, toasts, etc.), migrating from shadcn/Radix to coss/Base UI, composing trigger-based overlays, or troubleshooting coss component behavior. Covers imports, accessibility, Tailwind styling, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq data across donors, labs, and platforms. Follows the Mawla et al. 2019 framework for assessing cross-study reproducibility, TIN-based quality filtering, and detection-limit-aware interpretation. Handles batch correction (Harmony/Seurat), dropout awareness, cross-contamination artifacts, and platform-specific biases. Use this skill for ANY scRNA-seq integration task, cross-dataset comparison, cell atlas construction, or reproducibility assessment involving ENCODE single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a customer referral program (who may accept the reward, how the introduction is made), designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for an early-stage startup where the founder is still doing the selling — running founder-led sales, setting up a design-partner program, judging whether you have product-market fit, deciding what not to do yet, deciding when to hire the first AE or first marketer, and moving upmarket to larger buyers. Also use it when your company has just acquired another (or is about to), to plan the marketing integration: what you may and may not do between signing and close, the first letter to the acquired customers, whether to keep, endorse, fold in or retire the acquired brand, merging the two marketing databases without mailing people who opted out, when to start cross-selling, and announcing a product sunset. Also use it to design a demand-generation campaign and the channel plan it runs on: one campaign with one job, the offer for buyers who are and are not in market, what each channel is for, the kill and scale rules set before launch, the follow-up sales agrees to, the yearly calendar of always-on programs and tentpole campaigns, and which channels to keep, test or stop. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: founder-led sales, founder-led GTM, design partners, design partner agreement, first customers, first 10 customers, do we have product-market fit, PMF, Sean Ellis test, very disappointed survey, pre-seed, seed stage, when to hire our first AE, first sales hire, first marketing hire, moving upmarket, going upmarket, enterprise readiness, first enterprise deal, what do enterprise buyers need before they sign, positioning, product launch, beta program, early access program, design partners, private preview, public preview, general availability, GA launch, when can we call it GA, can sales sell a beta feature, selling the roadmap, launch tier, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, ideal customer profile, ICP, what is our real ICP, who actually buys from us, refresh our ICP from closed-won deals, ICP refresh before planning, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget. Also triggers on public-sector marketing: sell to government, government marketing, public sector go-to-market, federal marketing, state and local government, SLED, FedRAMP, FedRAMP marketing claims, can we say FedRAMP ready, GovRAMP, StateRAMP, VPAT, accessibility confor

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify, customize, or opt out of moflo's AUTOMATIC durable-learning sharing across git worktrees / Conductor workspaces on one machine. As of the worktree-auto-sharing change this is on by default — learnings converge across a repo's worktrees with no setup. Use when the user asks "is memory shared across my worktrees?", "where are my worktree learnings stored?", "turn off worktree memory sharing", "share learnings across my separate clones", or "point my worktrees at a custom store". For a team or cross-machine (git-tracked) sharing, use /memory-team instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when taking a repo open source, or hardening one that already is. Run /oss-launch and it scans the repo (stack, existing files, git remote, secrets), asks only what it cannot infer, then generates a tailored OSS file collection (README, LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, SECURITY, CHANGELOG, .gitignore, .github/ issue + PR templates, CI/CD). Also covers launch (GitHub metadata, badges, Show HN, Reddit, YouTube), release cadence (SemVer + CHANGELOG), and demo-GIF generation. Triggers on "open source this", "OSS checklist", "prep for launch", "make this repo public", "add a license / contributing / security policy", "Show HN", "release workflow", "star growth", "get contributors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate browser testing, web scraping, and user workflow testing with Playwright across multiple browsers. Use when writing end-to-end tests for web applications, automating repetitive browser tasks, scraping data from websites, testing across Chrome/Firefox/Safari, taking screenshots for visual regression testing, testing authentication flows, filling and submitting forms programmatically, testing responsive designs across viewports, or any browser automation requiring reliable, cross-browser testing capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair and verify cross-references between SKILL.md files after a skill is created, renamed, removed, or restructured. Ensures every skill that calls another skill references the correct name, and every skill that is called has accurate "Called by" context. Load after universal-skill-creator creates a skill, after improve-skills completes a cycle, after a skill is renamed or removed, or when the user asks to fix cross-references, sync skill links, repair broken skill references, update skill cross-links, check skill references, or "are cross-links correct".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

文書や会話、仕事の情報を内容に合う保存先へ整理し、ローカルファイルや知識ベース、GitHubなどを横断して重複確認、同期、検索を進めるスキル。

• 文書や会話を知識ベースに保存したいとき
• 重複するメモの整理
• 複数の保存先にある知識の同期

複数のEVMチェーンでトークン残高や価格の桁がずれる問題を防ぐため、小数桁数の実行時取得、チェーン別キャッシュ、精度を保つ計算と単位統一を扱うスキル。

• トークン残高の桁ずれを調べたいとき
• 複数EVMチェーンの数量比較
• ブリッジ後の小数桁数の確認

Flag misspelled, brandjacked, and typosquatted package names across npm, PyPI, and crates.io before installation, using edit-distance, keyboard-proximity, and known-target corpus matching with typomania, Microsoft OSSGadget's oss-find-squats, and pypi-scan. Use before adding a new dependency, as a CI/CD gate on pull requests, when reviewing an AI-generated ("slopsquatting") dependency list, or when auditing a lockfile diff for a swapped package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants a .pptx with smooth cross-slide animation — PowerPoint Morph transitions, Keynote-style continuous motion, shapes that grow / move / rotate as the slide advances. Trigger on: 'morph', 'morph transition', 'smooth transition', 'continuous animation across slides', 'Keynote-style transition', 'animated slide sequence', 'shape continuity across slides'. Output is a single .pptx. This skill is a scene layer on top of officecli-pptx — inherits every pptx v2 rule (visual floor, grid, palettes, connector canon, Delivery Gate 1–5a). DO NOT invoke for a generic deck, pitch deck, or board review without cross-slide motion — route those to officecli-pptx base or officecli-pitch-deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compliance OS — meta-orchestrator that lets compliance teams CONFIGURE which frameworks apply, COMPUTE cross-framework control overlap, SIMULATE internal audits, and CONSOLIDATE evidence across multiple frameworks. Four decisions: (1) Given a company profile, which of the 12 supported frameworks apply (ISO 27001/13485/42001/14971, EU AI Act, MDR 745, GDPR, SOC 2, FDA QSR, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, HIPAA)? (2) Across selected frameworks, which controls overlap and how much evidence reuses? (3) For a given framework + scope, what does a realistic mock audit produce — drawing from the 205-scenario library? (4) Across selected frameworks, what's the unified evidence checklist with reuse map? Use when standing up a multi-framework program, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1. Does NOT replace per-framework skills (it orchestrates them).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and troubleshoot Google Cloud cross-project centralized logging and read-time aggregation. Use when: - Setting up log routing from multiple projects/folders/organizations to a central log bucket. - Creating cross-project log sinks and configuring central log buckets. - Troubleshooting cross-project routing. Don't use for single-project basic configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International / multilingual SEO audit focused on hreflang correctness: missing or broken return tags, wrong language/region codes, missing x-default, self-referencing errors, hreflang vs canonical conflicts, and inconsistent signals across HTML head, HTTP headers and XML sitemap. Also reviews URL structure (ccTLD vs subdirectory vs subdomain), language targeting and geo signals. Use whenever the user runs a multi-language or multi-region site and asks about hreflang, international or multilingual SEO, the wrong-language page showing in search, or duplicate content across country versions. Trigger on: "hreflang", "international SEO", "multilingual SEO", "multi-region", "wrong language in Google", "x-default", "ccTLD vs subdirectory", "geo targeting", "language targeting", "my English page shows for Thai users", "th/en page ranking in the wrong country", or any cross-language/cross-country ranking question. For full-site audits use /seo-analysis; for a single URL use /seo-page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides migration, provisioning, search, log-analytics, trace-analytics, and Agentic AI Assistant workflows for Amazon OpenSearch Service and Serverless across six capabilities — migration (Solr/ES/self-managed into AOS/AOSS, schema/query translation, sizing, cutover); provisioning (domain + AOSS lifecycle, upgrades, FGAC, monitoring); search (vector / semantic / hybrid / RAG with Bedrock); log-analytics (PPL, OSI, anomaly detection, Dashboards); trace-analytics (OTel spans, service maps, Data Prepper); ai-assistant (natural language data exploration, incident investigation, root cause analysis). Triggers on OpenSearch, AOS, AOSS, Elasticsearch, Solr, vector/k-NN/semantic/hybrid search, RAG, log analytics, PPL, trace analytics, ISM, FAISS, HNSW, Migration Assistant, UltraWarm, OR1, query my data, analyze logs, investigate errors, root cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants a .pptx with smooth cross-slide animation — PowerPoint Morph transitions, Keynote-style continuous motion, shapes that grow / move / rotate as the slide advances. Trigger on: 'morph', 'morph transition', 'smooth transition', 'continuous animation across slides', 'Keynote-style transition', 'animated slide sequence', 'shape continuity across slides'. Output is a single .pptx. This skill is a scene layer on top of officecli-pptx — inherits every pptx v2 rule (visual floor, grid, palettes, connector canon, Delivery Gate 1–5a). DO NOT invoke for a generic deck, pitch deck, or board review without cross-slide motion — route those to officecli-pptx base or officecli-pitch-deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape BOSS直聘 (job listing site) via Chrome CDP. Searches jobs by keyword/city/filters, fetches JD details, outputs structured JSON/CSV with plaintext salary, and can summarize scraped results into a job-market prompt. Use when user wants to search/analyze jobs on BOSS直聘 or zhipin.com.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants a .pptx with smooth cross-slide animation — PowerPoint Morph transitions, Keynote-style continuous motion, shapes that grow / move / rotate as the slide advances. Trigger on: 'morph', 'morph transition', 'smooth transition', 'continuous animation across slides', 'Keynote-style transition', 'animated slide sequence', 'shape continuity across slides'. Output is a single .pptx. This skill is a scene layer on top of officecli-pptx — inherits every pptx v2 rule (visual floor, grid, palettes, connector canon, Delivery Gate 1–5a). DO NOT invoke for a generic deck, pitch deck, or board review without cross-slide motion — route those to officecli-pptx base or officecli-pitch-deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transfers gene annotations between genome assemblies via coordinate liftover (UCSC liftOver, CrossMap for same-species version updates) or feature/sequence projection (Liftoff for same/close species, miniprot for protein-level cross-species, TOGA/GeMoMa/CAT for distant clades). Covers the coordinate-vs-projection decision by divergence, why a successful lift is not biological confirmation, reference bias, the silent-dropping of unmapped features, build/PAR/MHC/inversion hazards, and transfer-vs-de-novo validation. Use when annotating a new assembly of a species with an existing reference, harmonizing coordinates across builds, or mapping annotations across related species.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。