2,420 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluate a teacher-drafted central historical question for its capacity to drive genuine historical inquiry. Use when assessing whether a question will generate real evidence-weighing or produce shallow responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a full design-thinking engagement (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) grounded in real user evidence. Use whenever the user wants to understand users deeply and design a solution for them: "run design thinking", "understand our users", "design user interviews", "synthesize these interview notes", "build personas", "write How-Might-We questions", "prototype this concept", "design a usability test", "our users are churning and we don't know why", in any language ("tư duy thiết kế", "nghiên cứu người dùng", "phỏng vấn khách hàng", "デザイン思考", "设计思维"), even when they never say "design thinking". Also use when the user drops raw interview notes, transcripts, or survey exports and wants insights, personas, or product decisions. Not for "is there a market for X" desk questions (market-researcher).
Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find question-based Google Autocomplete suggestions for any topic. Prepends question modifiers (what, how, why) to a seed topic and returns real autocomplete suggestions — useful for AEO prompt research, content ideation, and understanding what people ask about a topic. Use when the user wants to discover questions people search for, find content angles, or do keyword/prompt research for a topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-asks the most recent question through the agent's interactive questionnaire tool instead of plain text, and keeps using that tool for every later question with concrete options. Use when the user invokes `/qs` or `$qs`, or asks for a question to be re-posed as selectable choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.
システム療法および解決志向アプローチの手法：ミラクル・クエスチョン、スケーリング、例外の探索、サーキュラー・クエスチョン、仮定の質問、悪化の質問、コーピング・クエスチョン。solution-focused-therapy および systemic-questioning から統合。
Builds a DRAFT quiz from the training content the user supplies (slide deck, manual, e-learning script, session transcript, procedure): numbered questions with the correct answer, distractors drawn from the content itself, an explanation quoting the source passage with its location, a difficulty tag (Recall, Apply, Analyse) with its basis, and a coverage table showing which sections and objectives each question tests and which are left uncovered. Use when the user asks to "build a quiz from this deck", "write knowledge check questions for this module", "create an assessment from this training", "test understanding of this procedure" or "which sections does this quiz cover". Do not use for a reader-facing question and answer page built from documents, use faq-builder instead; for writing the procedure itself from notes or a walkthrough, use sop-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user presents an idea/plan/proposal and wants a specific 16-minds (MBTI) personality to ask probing questions back — instead of giving an answer. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「ENTPでツッコんで」「INFJに問い詰めて」「ENTJ視点で質問して」「このアイデア叩いて」, English equivalents like "as ENTP, question this" / "INFJ would ask what?", or 16-minds commands with a `--ask` flag. AIに「答えさせる」のではなく「問わせる」ためのSkill。ユーザーが思考を整理したい時に使う。
Prepares the user for a specific interview from their real experience. Builds a story bank in Situation/Task/Action/Result/Reflection form mapped to the competencies the role and company test (such as Amazon's Leadership Principles), writes a cited company and role brief from public sources, predicts questions per round, drafts opener, why-us, weakness and salary answers, prepares questions to ask and a logistics checklist, and runs a post-interview debrief. Use when the user says "help me prepare for my interview", "I have an interview tomorrow" or "in 2 hours", "build my story bank", "STAR stories", "interviewing as a career changer", "what will they ask me", "how do I answer tell me about yourself", "questions to ask the interviewer", "research the company" or "debrief my interview". Uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. For scored role-play practice, mock-interview; for thank-you notes and tracking, job-application-manager; for a salary number, offers or negotiation, offer-negotiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare for due diligence meetings — management presentations, expert network calls, customer references, and advisor sessions. Generates targeted question lists, benchmarks to reference, and red flags to probe. Use before any diligence meeting or call. Triggers on "prep for management meeting", "diligence call prep", "expert call questions", "customer reference questions", or "meeting prep for [company]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:founder-mode <question> — Auto-routes any founder question to the right C-role advisor or to /cs:boardroom for multi-role topics. The single-command entry point. Use when a founder asks any strategic question without knowing which advisor or command fits — e.g. 'runway pressure' routes to the CFO, 'gross retention dropped' routes to the CCO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast "is this a problem?" answer for the quick Slack question — pattern-matches against your calibration. Use when the user says "is this a problem", "quick question", "can we do X", "do I need legal review for", "sanity check", or pastes a PM's question that needs a same-minute fine / needs a look / hold call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bar prep questions — MBE or essay, targeted at your weak subjects and bar jurisdiction. Tracks misses and comes back to patterns. Use when the user says "bar prep", "MBE questions", "practice essay", or "test me for the bar".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a focused N-question study session on a subject — MBE, essay, or flashcards. Tracks performance and updates the study plan. Use when the user says "run me 10 questions on [subject]", "do a session on [subject]", "let's do 5 cards on [subject]", or wants to drill a fixed number of questions and have the plan adapt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amazon Alexa for Shopping Q&A automation: submits questions to Amazon's Alexa/Rufus AI shopping assistant and collects response text; supports optional keyword search context (navigate to search results page before asking for category-specific answers). Use when user mentions Amazon Alexa, Rufus, Amazon shopping assistant, Amazon AI chat, ask Amazon, Amazon Q&A, automate Alexa questions, Rufus chatbot, Amazon assistant automation, collect Alexa responses, bulk question submission to Amazon, keyword search context, category research. Also applies to extracting Amazon product recommendations from conversational AI, automating repeated queries to Amazon's AI shopping feature, collecting Alexa shopping responses at scale, or market research within a specific product category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --all to skip area selection and discuss all gray areas interactively. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (Claude picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skip profile question when user explicitly refuses to answer. When user says 'I don't want to answer' or 'skip this question', use this tool to stop asking about that item.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dontbesilent 好问题生成器。把模糊问题改写成 Agent 可推理、可批评、可验证的问题说明书，并判断它能被自动化解决到什么程度。 触发方式：/dbs-good-question、/好问题、/问题说明书、/Agent可解性、「这个问题能不能自动化解决」「帮我把问题说清楚」 Turn fuzzy problems into agent-solvable problem briefs and evaluate automation readiness. Trigger: /dbs-good-question, "clarify this problem", "can an agent solve this"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build traceable internal-review proposal, RFI, RFP, tender, bid, and questionnaire responses from supplied questions and approved sources. Use to analyze questions, contribute business or product evidence, or draft qualified responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。