「research」の検索結果

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports continuous agent operation via Claude Code /loop and OpenClaw heartbeat, and produces research presentations and papers. Use when starting a research project, running autonomous experiments, or managing a multi-hypothesis research effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports continuous agent operation via Claude Code /loop and OpenClaw heartbeat, and produces research presentations and papers. Use when starting a research project, running autonomous experiments, or managing a multi-hypothesis research effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze current trends and challenges in Japanese NLP for a topic. Surveys the existing awesome-japanese-nlp-resources dataset and augments it with up-to-the-minute web research to produce a combined trend + issue report. Use only when the user explicitly wants a trend/landscape report, a challenges/limitations report, or a general research overview of a Japanese NLP topic (this combines the bundled dataset with live web research). Trigger phrases include '日本語LLMの最新トレンド', '〜の動向をまとめて', '最近の日本語NLPの流れ', '日本語LLMの課題', '〜の問題点・限界', '未解決の論点', 'trend report on Japanese embeddings', 'latest Japanese speech models', 'challenges in Japanese NER', 'limitations of Japanese embeddings'. For a simple lookup use the search skill; this one runs web research.

When you want multi-source, multi-step research on a topic — competitor research before a sales call, market research for a new business idea, positioning angles, due diligence on a partnership or podcast guest, tech decision research (which DB, which auth), or any "I need to actually understand X." Combines web search, URL fetch, agent-browser, last30days (Reddit/X/YouTube/HN/web recency), memory, and Notion. Outputs a structured brief with citations, contradictions, gaps, and recommended next steps. Archives every research run to ~/.config/makerskills/deep-research/archive/ so past work is searchable. Triggers on "/deep-research," "research X," "investigate X," "do a deep dive on X," "look into X," "what's actually happening with X," "due diligence on X," "validate this market." Differs from a one-shot web search: this is multi-pass with verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research ideation workflow from literature search to research planning. Triggers on "brainstorm research ideas", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", "research ideation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements for research uses of protected health information under 45 CFR §164.512(i). Covers IRB and Privacy Board waivers of authorization, individual authorization for research, limited data set and data use agreements, preparatory to research provisions, and decedent research provisions. Keywords: HIPAA research, IRB waiver, Privacy Board, authorization, limited data set, preparatory research, de-identification, Common Rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. Inside: 4-step research framework (website → social → traffic → ad spend) · 3-version Wayback evolution analysis · X/Twitter propagation-chain mapping · growth-flywheel 6-stage scoring · KOL identification · content-effectiveness ranking · ICP + freemium pricing teardown · self-check checklist. New in 1.2: time-machine competitor archaeology — Google date-range search back to pre-fame years, star-history launch-day reconstruction (AppFlowy ~40-channel zero-budget launch teardown), competitor funding news as a launch-timing signal, and the "open source alternative" positioning play. Sourced from first-hand founder interviews (AFFiNE co-founder, 2026-04, self-reported figures marked). 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • 4-step research framework (website teardown → social media → traffic sources → ad spend) • 3-version website evolution analysis (V1 / Beta / Launch via Wayback Machine) • X/Twitter propagation chain mapping (4-phase model + single-post teardown template) • Growth flywheel 6-stage scoring system (Activation → Referral → Acquisition → Retention → Revenue → Product) • KOL identification framework (Traffic King / Topic Starter / Mindset Shifter) • Content effectiveness ranking (validated: Visual Demo > User Story > Competitor Comparison) • ICP deep analysis template + Freemium pricing teardown • Complete self-check checklist 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

Multi-source comprehensive research using perplexity-researcher, claude-researcher, and gemini-researcher agents. Launches up to 10 parallel research agents for fast results. USE WHEN user says 'do research', 'research X', 'find information about', 'investigate', 'analyze trends', 'current events', or any research-related request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canonical vault merge. Use when the user wants autonomous or deep research that may access the public web. Triggers: /autoresearch, autoresearch, research this topic, deep dive into, investigate, find everything about, research and file, go research, build a wiki on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with hyperresearch, for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Use when the user asks for deep research, a research report, a literature review, or a multi-source analysis with verified citations. Checks that the hyperresearch CLI is installed, sets it up in the current project for the agent you are running in, then hands off to the hyperresearch pipeline (a tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline with a persistent source vault). Not for quick lookups one or two searches can answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turning research artifacts into actionable PM insight. Customer interviews, user research notes, support ticket reviews, sales call transcripts, survey data, in-app feedback, all synthesized into the decisions they are meant to inform. The discipline of moving from raw discovery data to clear product direction without losing signal in the synthesis or fabricating insight that was not actually there. Triggers on research synthesis, customer interview synthesis, user research analysis, discovery readout, research insights, sales call analysis, support ticket analysis, qualitative data analysis. Also triggers when a team has done research but cannot turn it into decisions, when synthesis is producing pretty decks but no roadmap movement, or when an upcoming PM decision needs to be grounded in research already conducted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-refresh research entries in ./research/ using parallel research-curator agents. Use when /refresh-research is invoked, stale research needs updating, or bulk re-verification of research entries is requested. Inventories entries by review date and age, runs RT-ICA pre-flight, spawns agents in waves of 5, then validates, reviews, and commits through research-curator. Supports --all, --stale, --category, --layer, and --dry-run flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply action research through Plan-Act-Observe-Reflect cycles and Participatory Action Research (PAR) to generate knowledge while improving practice. Use this skill when the user needs to design practitioner research that integrates inquiry with intervention, facilitate participatory research with stakeholders, structure iterative improvement cycles, or when they ask 'how do I research my own practice', 'how do I involve participants as co-researchers', or 'how do I combine research with practical change'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate setup, configuration, execution, monitoring, and troubleshooting of AutoResearchClaw — the 23-stage autonomous research pipeline that generates conference-grade papers. Use when the user mentions ResearchClaw, wants to write a research paper autonomously, needs to set up or debug the pipeline, or says research paper, autonomous research, or paper generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and enforce standard YAML frontmatter on research documents with JD-aware path resolution. Use when creating, editing, or validating research files, when user mentions "research metadata", "research frontmatter", "research staleness", "validate research", "RD-rules", or "research docs validation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。