「serialization」の検索結果

Design serialization schemas using JSON Schema, Protocol Buffer definitions, or Apache Avro. Covers schema versioning, backwards compatibility, validation rules, and evolution strategies for long-lived data formats. Use when defining a new API contract or data interchange format, adding fields to an existing schema without breaking consumers, migrating between schema versions, choosing between schema systems, or documenting data validation rules for automated enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with the @upstash/redis TypeScript/JavaScript SDK, a serverless HTTP-based Redis client for Next.js, Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, edge runtimes, and Node.js. Use when adding a cache (cache-aside, write-through, TTL and expiration strategies), session storage and user sessions, a key-value store, leaderboards and rankings with sorted sets, counters, distributed locks, queues with lists, streams and consumer groups, sparse index-addressed arrays and ring buffers (ARSET, ARINSERT, ARRING, ARGREP, AROP), embeddings and nearest-neighbour vector search stored inside Redis (VECTOR commands via redis.vector, separate from @upstash/vector), JSON documents, pipelines and MULTI/EXEC transactions, Lua scripting, read replicas, or full-text search, typo-tolerant search, facets, aggregations, and search over Redis stream entries with Upstash Redis Search (different from regular FT.SEARCH; also available for TCP clients via @upstash/search-redis and @upstash/search-ioredis). Also use when migrating from ioredis or node-redis, when a Redis connection is needed from a serverless function without connection pooling, when integrating @upstash/ratelimit, or when the user says Redis cache, KV store, session store, serverless Redis, or Upstash Redis. Also use when building AI agents on Redis with Upstash AgentKit (agent memory, chat history, RAG tools, tool caching, chat persistence, resumable streams, distributed locks) for the Vercel AI SDK, TanStack AI, or Vercel Eve. Supports automatic serialization/deserialization of JavaScript types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in the AI Supply Chain by injecting malicious models, datasets, or dependencies. Use this skill to simulate advanced persistent threats (APTs) compromising Hugging Face repositories, manipulating pre-trained weights (Model Poisoning), and exploiting insecure deserialization during model loading (e.g., Pickle files).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects code quality vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: SQL injection in SQLite, JavaScript injection in WebViews, intent injection, unsafe deserialization, NSKeyedUnarchiver, NSCoding, Java serialization, Parcelable, buffer overflow, JNI native code, PIE disabled, NX disabled, stack canary absent, RELRO, ARC disabled, third-party library CVE, vulnerable dependency, outdated SDK, targetSdkVersion, update enforcement missing, implicit Intent, URL loading in WebView, object persistence, memory corruption, OWASP dependency check. Covers MASVS-CODE-1/2/3/4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization playbook. Use when Java, PHP, or Python applications deserialize untrusted data via ObjectInputStream, unserialize, pickle, or similar mechanisms that may lead to RCE, file access, or privilege escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Deep comparison of A2A protocol, MCP, OpenAI function calling, and LangChain message types. Teaches when to use rigid schemas vs free-form with validation, typed vs untyped, streaming vs batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在授权渗透测试中挖掘不安全反序列化（insecure deserialization）。当目标把用户可控数据交给 unserialize/Marshal/pickle/ObjectInputStream/BinaryFormatter/YAML.load 等还原成对象时使用——典型场景：cookie/token/viewstate/隐藏字段里出现序列化数据、导入文件触发对象还原、想借 gadget chain 拿 RCE。适用目标类型 Web / REST API（PHP/Ruby/Python/Java/.NET）。触发场景包括用户说"测下反序列化""这个 cookie 是不是序列化对象""能不能 gadget chain 打 RCE""phar/Marshal/pickle 打一下"。输出：识别出的序列化落点 + gadget 可用性判定 + 带外/回显证据的 finding（含 killed 记录）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ktorサーバーパターン — ルーティングDSL、プラグイン、認証、Koin DI、kotlinx.serialization、WebSocket、testApplicationテスト。

Complete guide for Testcontainers NoSQL integration testing. Use when containerized integration testing for MongoDB or Redis. Covers MongoDB document operations, Redis five data structures, Collection Fixture pattern. Includes BSON serialization, index performance testing, data isolation strategy, and container lifecycle management. Keywords: testcontainers mongodb, testcontainers redis, mongodb integration test, redis integration test, nosql testing, MongoDbContainer, RedisContainer, IMongoDatabase, IConnectionMultiplexer, BSON serialization, BsonDocument, document model testing, cache testing, Collection Fixture

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit PHP deserialization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit Java deserialization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit .NET deserialization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy static-analysis alert. Covers injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control and IDOR, insecure deserialization, secrets in code, unsafe dependencies, and business-logic flaws. Use when the user asks to security-scan, security-review, or audit their code, repo, or pull request for vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for file uploads, imports, previews, archive extraction, format conversion, parser invocation, and deserialization chains. Use when the user asks to inspect an upload or import path, trace archive extraction, preview or converter behavior, explain how a file reaches a parser or deserializer, or connect one uploaded artifact to the decisive backend effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or moving code across shared/frontend/backend modules in packages/kilo-jetbrains/ — split-mode RPC contracts, serialization classloader pitfall, threading/EDT annotations, services and coroutine scopes, EDT test rules, dependency bundling, and the CLI server protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for writing Apache Cassandra in-JVM distributed tests (dtests). Use when creating tests that simulate multi-node Cassandra clusters within a single JVM for faster integration testing. Covers cluster creation (single-node, multi-node, multi-datacenter), configuration (all cassandra.yaml parameters, features, network topology), instance lifecycle (startup/shutdown/restart), query execution, message filtering for failure scenarios, running code on instances, ClusterUtils utilities, and debugging classloader-related issues (serialization failures, same-class-different-classloader problems).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep file-focused code review for correctness bugs. Unlike shallow-review which runs 6 specialists in parallel across the entire patch, deep-review focuses on user-specified files with full pattern catalogs (500+ patterns), codebase investigation, and source-level context gathering. Use when: the user specifies particular files for focused review, a shallow review flagged areas that need deeper investigation, reviewing critical-path code changes, examining complex serialization/lifecycle/state-machine changes. The user instructs which files to focus on (typically a subset of files in the patch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt this C/C++ ASAN vulnerability pipeline to a different vulnerability class, target shape, language, or detection mechanism. Use when the user wants to port, migrate, retarget, customize, or fork the pipeline for something other than C/C++ memory-safety bugs — web apps, smart contracts, deserialization, ML systems, or any other domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。