「sub-agent」の検索結果

指定したコミットやブランチなどを基準にコードの変更を確認し、開発規約への適合と仕様の実現を別々にレビューします。二つの観点の指摘を分けて報告するスキルです。

• ブランチやPRの変更レビュー
• 指定コミットやタグ以降の確認
• 文書化された開発規約との照合

Optimisation findings from your own Claude Code and Codex logs — low cache hit ratio, 1-hour cache writes that did not pay back, sub-agents on a top-tier model, Codex reasoning share, bloated sessions — each with evidence and a what-if saving. Use when asked how to cut spend or why it is high.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ruflo is a multi-agent orchestration platform for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Amp, +12 more). Use this skill when the user wants to (1) install/init ruflo in a project, (2) run multi-agent swarms with hierarchical coordination, (3) use ruflo's 314+ MCP tools for memory, routing, hooks, sub-agents, or workflows, (4) check ruflo status/version/doctor health, or (5) discover which of ruflo's 30+ plugins fits their task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a music track (an audio file, or a video to pull audio from) and wants a beat-synced HyperFrames video, calm to hard-hitting. The music drives everything: one analyzer reads it once, the orchestrator lays out the frames and fills a per-frame plan, and one sub-agent builds each frame. Typography and templates are the floor — a complete video needs zero assets — but any images or videos the user supplies are cut into the frames on the same beat grid (beat-cut / ken-burns). The genre (lyric video, slideshow, kinetic promo) falls out of the per-frame choices; the pipeline never branches on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replace the manual commit-by-commit classification step in `breeze release-management prepare-provider-documentation` with AI-driven classification. For each provider with pending changes, analyze every PR (batched into one sub-agent per provider, not one per PR), pay special attention to potentially breaking changes by inspecting the actual diff, scope multi-provider PRs to the current provider's slice, ask the release manager when uncertain, and apply version bumps + changelog entries. Use during the regular provider release cycle as an alternative to the interactive breeze prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work on one hard mathematics problem in this session yourself, with no sub-agents: reason in stages, record each settled step in a notes file so that nothing written is lost if a response is cut off, and end with a self-contained proof.md. Usage: /math-proof:solo <the problem, stated in full, or the path of a file holding it>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you need the allowed_tools / skills preset for a sub-agent role before calling spawn_subagent. Trigger especially when user mentions: "role", "spawn_subagent", "allowed_tools", or any OMP role name (executor, architect, analyst, critic, security-reviewer, code-reviewer, qa-tester, planner, explore, debugger, verifier). Also use when a /ultrawork, /ralph, /autopilot, /ultraqa, or /team workflow step asks for role tool/skill configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in ambient signal capture. After explicit enablement, applies on substantive inbound messages to detect original thinking and entity mentions. Use an authorized sub-agent where supported; otherwise detect inline. Aim to never block the main response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive Anthropic's Claude Code CLI (`claude -p`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Codex. Use when you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Claude, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, hand off long-context planning, or fan out parallel agents. Covers the exact `claude -p` flags, permission modes, output capture, JSON/stream-json modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PUA Shot — compact all-in-one PUA reference for explicit injection into sub-agents or short sessions. Strong flavor, same evidence-first behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for the tool-interface layer of an agent system specifically: writing tool descriptions agents can route on, designing tool schemas and response formats, naming conventions, actionable error recovery messages, MCP server design, tool-set consolidation, and deciding when to add or remove an individual tool. Use this when the unit of work is a single tool or a set of tools. Route project-shape, pipeline architecture, and task-model-fit decisions to project-development; route deciding whether to introduce sub-agents to multi-agent-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent verification agent for loop-produced changes. Finds reasons to reject. Runs tests. Confirms diff scope. Use after minimal-fix or any implementer sub-agent — never in the same role as the implementer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run independent subtasks in parallel — one git worktree and one implementation sub-agent per task, each opening its own PR — then cross-review every PR. polly never merges; the human does.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end test the polly multi-agent coding orchestrator's critical user journeys (CUJs). Two halves — a deterministic mock-LLM driver (polly_cuj.py) that boots a throwaway local server + mock LLM and asserts the substrate (boot, bridged sys_* tool dispatch, the blast_radius / spawn_bounds / headless_subagent_purpose_guard guardrails, fan-out delegation), and a live real-CLI recipe (real claude/codex/pi, real worktrees/PRs) for polly's actual judgment. Load when developing, testing, or debugging examples/polly — its config.yaml, the claude_code/codex/pi sub-agents, the investigate/fanout/cross-review skills, or the omnigent.inner.nessie.policies guardrails — or reproducing a polly orchestration bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate read-only investigation, debugging, audit, search, or code-understanding tasks to sub-agents; synthesize only from their structured reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Max-3-cycle protocol for agent sub-tasks with WHY context and coordinator validation. Use when spawning sub-agents to complete scoped work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts efficiently with parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation. Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents with clear ownership and dependency-aware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Braintrust tracing for Claude Code - hook architecture, sub-agent correlation, debugging

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。