「testability」の検索結果

ACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, `.cs`, or `.csproj`; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for hard-to-test framework dependencies; or verifying those C# calls are already abstracted. DO NOT USE FOR: any target lacking the activation prerequisite; generating wrappers (use generate-testability-wrappers); migrating code (use migrate-static-to-wrapper); or general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE for C#/.NET deterministic tests that require the smallest production seam for DateTime/Task.Delay/File/Environment/Guid/Random, static API preservation, nested/parallel overrides, or no real I/O. USE ONLY when the target workspace contains C# source plus a .csproj or .sln. DO NOT USE for audits, bulk migration, code that already has an injectable seam, or an explicit migration to a user-named existing abstraction (migrate-static-to-wrapper). Use instead of general test generation when the requested test is impossible without a production edit and seam selection is still open.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for configuring dependency injection in .NET MAUI apps — service registration in MauiProgram.cs, lifetime selection (Singleton / Transient / Scoped), constructor injection, Shell navigation auto-resolution, platform-specific registrations, and testability patterns. USE FOR: "dependency injection", "DI setup", "AddSingleton", "AddTransient", "AddScoped", "service registration", "constructor injection", "IServiceProvider", "MauiProgram DI", "register services", "BindingContext injection". DO NOT USE FOR: data binding (use maui-data-binding), Shell route configuration (use maui-shell-navigation), unit-test mocking frameworks (use standard xUnit and NSubstitute patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides implementation patterns for Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters), and Domain-Driven Design in Python applications with FastAPI or Flask. Use when designing maintainable backends with separation of concerns, implementing repository patterns, creating entities/value objects/aggregates, or structuring domain logic independent of frameworks for testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides implementation patterns for Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters), and Domain-Driven Design in Java 21+ Spring Boot 3.5+ applications. Use when structuring layered architectures, separating domain logic from frameworks, implementing ports and adapters, creating entities/value objects/aggregates, or refactoring monolithic codebases for testability and maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Functional Core, Imperative Shell to isolate logic from side effects. Use when business logic is entangled with I/O or unit tests are slow and brittle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing PlainTab architecture, looking for refactoring opportunities, reducing coupling, improving testability, or making modules easier for agents to understand without redesigning stable behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude adapter for reviewing PlainTab architecture, coupling, testability, and refactoring opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Go web development persona enforcing zero global state, explicit error handling, input validation, testability, and documentation conventions. Use when building Go web applications to ensure production-quality code from the start.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critical Akka.NET best practices including EventStream vs DistributedPubSub, supervision strategies, error handling, Props vs DependencyResolver, work distribution patterns, and cluster/local mode abstractions for testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies implementation plan quality across 8 dimensions (requirement-coverage, task-completeness, dependency-validity, scope-sanity, artifact-wiring, risk-assessment, testability, estimation-quality) and returns pass/fail with per-dimension scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when non-trivial code needs a design, codebase design or architecture needs improving, or one module needs targeted interface narrowing, seams, or testability. Not for diagrams, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in DI architecture using Reflex for Unity 6+. Covers container setup, scoping, injection, command pattern, update management, and class taxonomy. Use when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first", or when the user asks about dependency injection, inversion of control, service architecture, or testable game code. Triggers on "set up DI", "add dependency injection", "create a service", "wire up dependencies", "make this testable", "decouple these systems", "add a command pattern", "cross-feature communication", or architecture discussions involving testability, decoupling, and service layers. Only activates when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first". For simpler projects, use uw-scriptable-object-arch instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean/hexagonal architecture: dependency rules, ports and adapters, layering, and testable boundaries. Use when structuring applications for maintainability and testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, write, and maintain automated tests in any language, with worked examples in Python and JavaScript/TypeScript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write or plan tests, apply TDD (red-green-refactor), structure unit tests with arrange-act-assert and given-when-then naming, choose between fakes, stubs, and mocks, set up dependency injection for testability, build integration tests with testcontainers, database seeding, or transaction rollback, write Playwright or Cypress end-to-end tests, use property-based testing with Hypothesis or fast-check, create pytest fixtures or factory_boy factories, review coverage or mutation testing, or triage flaky tests in CI. Also trigger for "test pyramid", "test trophy", "test isolation", "mocking", "snapshot tests", "golden files", "parametrized tests", "make the tests pass".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review product designs before engineering handoff or release for flow and state coverage, business-rule alignment, implementation clarity, accessibility, responsiveness, analytics, and testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-338B (Electronic Reliability Design Handbook). Use for electronic reliability engineering: R/M/A theory, reliability specification/allocation/prediction, parts management and derating, reliable circuit and fault-tolerant design, environmental and human performance reliability, FMEA/FMECA/FTA/sneak circuit analysis, design reviews and testability, FRACAS, reliability demonstration and growth testing, and systems-level R&M parameters. Covers selected Part 2 design-guidance topics only; skips large annex/part-stress tables. Guidance handbook — not a contractual requirement text. Does not replace MIL-HDBK-217 prediction libraries, service-specific reliability regs, or safety standards (see mil-std-882).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Kotlin specialist code review — framework-agnostic. Use whenever the user asks to review, audit, critique, or get feedback on Kotlin code, a file, a class, a function, a module, a diff, a branch, a commit, or a pull request. Judges Kotlin language idioms, logic correctness, architecture and layering, concurrency (coroutines, Flow, structured concurrency, cancellation, race conditions), null safety, exception safety, testability, performance, and security. Detects force-unwraps, unchecked casts, GlobalScope, leaked mutability, broken structured concurrency, hidden side effects, weak abstractions, untestable seams, allocation hot spots, weak crypto, input-validation gaps, and PII logging. Outputs prioritized findings with file:line anchors and minimal-diff fixes. No assumptions about DI framework, UI framework, or build system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。