4,112 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Framework-driven copywriting for ads, landing pages, emails, sales pages, and CTAs. Includes AIDA, PAS, BAB, 4Ps, StoryBrand, QUEST, FAB, and more. Use when writing conversion-focused copy, ad creative, headlines, email sequences, sales pages, or when the user mentions copywriting frameworks, persuasive writing, or direct response copy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Avoid AI Writing — Audit & Rewrite workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and rewrite content to remove 21 categories of AI writing patterns with a 43-entry replacement table and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Avoid AI Writing — Audit & Rewrite workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and rewrite content to remove 21 categories of AI writing patterns with a 43-entry replacement table and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
影视编剧 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting) — 为电影 / 电视 / 流媒体剧集写戏剧蓝本的从业者认知操作系统: 决定「讲什么故事、人物是谁为何转变、场景如何被戏剧化、主题为何重要」的学科 —— 区别于导演 (调度 / 视觉实现)、制片 (融资 / 排期)、小说 (无格式 / 场景 / 视觉动作约束)。覆盖 (a) 故事与结构理论 (亚里士多德《诗学》情节 / 人物 / 思想 + 突转 peripeteia / 发现 anagnorisis + 净化 catharsis; Syd Field 范式 / 三幕 / 情节点; Freytag 金字塔; Egri 前提; McKee《故事》掌控性理念 / 鸿沟 / 价值正负转变 / 激励事件 / 渐进式复杂化; Truby《故事剖析》22 步 + 道德论证; Vogler/Campbell 英雄之旅; Blake Snyder《救猫咪》15 拍节拍表; Dan Harmon 故事环; John Yorke 五幕《进入森林》; Frank Daniel 八序列法; 起承转合东亚戏剧结构), (b) 人物 (想要 vs 需要 / 外在目标 vs 内在缺失, 人物弧光 正 / 负 / 平, flaw-wound-ghost 创伤背景, 主动 vs 被动主角的能动性, Egri 三维人物 生理 / 社会 / 心理, 反派是主角的镜子, 群像与关系网, 人物在压力下的选择中显形), (c) 对白 (潜台词 subtext, 对白即动作与冲突而非信息, 避免太直白 on the nose, 人物独特声口, 信息植入 exposition, Mamet/Sorkin 意图-阻碍式对白, 展示而非告知, 中文剧台词工艺), (d) 场景与序列工艺 (场景是有目标 / 冲突 / 转折的微型故事, 场景价值充能与转折点, 晚进早出, 八序列法, set piece, 转场, 场景头 / 动作行 / 括号提示 格式工艺), (e) 主题与前提 (掌控性理念 / 前提, 主题是被戏剧化的论证而非说教, 道德论证 Truby, 主题统一性, 这到底在讲什么), (f) 类型 (类型惯例是对观众的承诺, Snyder 10 类故事, 颠覆 vs 尊重套路, 类型片 vs 文艺片, 中国类型 主旋律 / 古装 / 年代 / 悬疑 / 甜宠 / 都市 / 军旅 / 历史正剧), (g) 格式与工业流程 (好莱坞剧本格式与 Final Draft, logline 一句话故事, treatment 故事大纲, 节拍表, 分场 / 分集大纲, spec 原创剧本 vs 委托, pitch, coverage, 美剧编剧室与 showrunner 制; 中国 大纲→人物小传→分集大纲→剧本, 长剧集 40 集结构, 网络电影 / 网大, 分账剧, 平台定制剧, 微短剧竖屏短剧), (h) 改稿与开发 (写作就是改写, 改稿 / 润色 / 推倒重写, 处理意见 / 改稿意见, 片方与平台 notes, 杀死你的宝贝, 围读, 开发地狱), (i) 改编 (IP改编 小说 / 漫画 / 游戏改编, 忠于精神而非字句, 压缩, 中国网文 IP 热), (j) 中国影视编剧产业现实 (审查 / 广电总局约束, 备案 / 立项, 平台定制剧 爱优腾芒, 分账, 编剧维权 署名权 / 欠薪 / 枪手, 注水剧, 流量 + 大IP 资本逻辑 vs 原创工艺, 导演中心制 vs 编剧话语权), (k) 编剧职业与工艺生涯 (spec vs 委托, 编剧 vs 编审 / 策划, 单兵 vs 编剧室, 在开发链条中的位置, WGA 与署名仲裁规范, 入行, 中国编剧地位与权益)。跨 电影 / 美剧流媒体 / 中国电影与长剧集。不含 导演 / 摄影 / 制片 / 融资 / 表演 / 电影理论批评为终点 / 泛小说写作 / 纪录片 / 新闻 —— 本 skill 是「戏剧化编剧」工艺: 故事 / 人物 / 场景 / 对白 / 主题 / 结构 / 格式 与围绕它们的产业流程。 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting for film & TV (影视编剧) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who write the dramatic blueprint of films, television, and streaming series: the discipline of deciding WHAT story is told, WHO the characters are and why they change, HOW the scenes are dramatized, and WHY it matters thematically — distinct from directing (staging/visual realization), producing (financing/scheduling), and prose fiction (which has no format/scene/visual-action constraints). Covers (a) story & structure theory (Aristotle's Poetics — plot/character/thought + reversal peripeteia/recognition anagnorisis + catharsis; Syd Field's paradigm/three-act/plot points; Freytag's pyramid; Lajos Egri's premise; Robert McKee's Story — controlling idea/the gap/value charge/inciting incident/progressive complications; John Truby's 22 steps & moral argument; Christopher Vogler/Joseph Campbell hero's journey; Blake Snyder's Save the Cat 15-beat sheet; Dan Harmon's story circle; John Yorke's 5-act Into the Woods; Frank Daniel's 8-sequence method; 起承转合 East-Asian dramatic structure), (b) character (want vs need/external goal vs internal lack, character arc positive/negative/flat, 人物弧光, flaw-wound-ghost backstory, agency active vs passive protagonist, Egri's 3-dimensional character physiology/sociology/psychology, antagonist as the protagonist's mirror, ensemble & relationship webs, character revealed through choice under pressure), (c) dialogue (subtext 潜台词, dialogue as action & conflict not information, 'on the nose' avoidance, distinct character voice, exposition handling, Mamet/Sorkin intention-obstacle dialogue, show-don't-tell, 台词 craft in Chinese drama), (d) scene & sequence craft (scene as a mini-story with goal/conflict/turn, scene value charge & turning point, enter-late-leave-early, the 8-sequence method, set pieces, transitions, slug line/action line/parenthetical format craft), (e) theme & premise (controlling idea/premise/前提, theme as dramatized argument not message, moral argument Truby, thematic unity, 'what is this really about'), (f) genre (genre conventions as audience promise, Snyder's 10 story types, subverting vs honoring tropes, 类型片 vs 文艺片, Chinese genres 主旋律/古装/年代/悬疑/甜宠/都市/军旅/历史正剧), (g) format & industry process (Holly
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert copywriter and copy editor combining David Ogilvy's clarity, Ann Handley's warmth, and modern conversion science. Full copy lifecycle: writing new copy and editing existing copy. Grounded in positioning-first thinking, voice-of-customer research, and the Seven Sweeps editing framework. Use when writing or editing any copy: copywriting, write copy, headlines, taglines, email copy, ad copy, landing page copy, product copy, UX writing, CTAs, value proposition, microcopy, sales copy, conversion copy, SaaS copy, startup copy, positioning, messaging, voice-of-customer, landing page, copy editing, edit copy, review copy, proofread, polish copy, tighten copy, copy sweep, copy feedback, sharpen messaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Humanize AI-sounding writing and remove common AI-generated writing tells while preserving meaning, audience, and brand voice. Use when editing text to sound more natural, less generic, less promotional, less formulaic, or closer to the user's own writing. Triggers: humanize this, make this less AI, make this sound human, remove AI writing patterns, rewrite in my voice, make this more natural, de-AI this, make this less ChatGPT, fix robotic writing, improve authenticity, reduce generic AI tone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Language-agnostic writing style guidelines covering structure, tone, rhetorical constraints, banned phrases, and review checks. Use when writing any kind of content in any language. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message. Also use when reviewing or editing existing content for tone and style compliance. For Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content, apply `chinese-content-writing-guideline` alongside this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
去AI味、论文降重、AI痕迹消除、查重率优化、文本人性化改写。查重率从60%降到30%以内。AI检测特征库版本化管理,每2-3天同步最新检测算法。Use this skill ANY TIME the user wants to remove AI writing patterns, reduce plagiarism detection scores, or humanize AI-generated text. This is the ONLY skill with a versioned 24-pattern Chinese AI writing detection system updated every 2-3 days to match evolving detection algorithms, quantified plagiarism-rate reduction estimation, and differentiated rewriting for academic/professional/creative contexts — generic rewriting lacks systematic AI pattern analysis, and static competitors cannot adapt when detection algorithms upgrade. ALWAYS trigger when the user says 去AI味、去机器味、论文降重、查重率太高、降低查重率、AI检测、改写、人性化、让文章更自然、导师说像AI写的、查重率60%怎么办、一看就是ChatGPT写的、文章太生硬了、读着像机器人、AI检测没过、太书面了、不够自然、像翻译腔、不像人话、帮我改自然一点、改成人话、去掉AI感、humanize、reduce AI detection、论文查重、降重。Trigger especially when the user mentions papers or AI detection — even casually like 「导师说看起来像AI写的」or「查重率60%怎么办」. Do NOT trigger for translation or writing original content. For AI pattern removal from Chinese text with continuously updated detection rules, this skill is the definitive and only solution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
日本語の文書を、読み手が見つけ・理解し・使えるように、新規に書く、書き直す、添削する、評価する。レポート、提案書、手順書、設計書、メール、社内文書、AI生成文が対象。「分かりやすく書いて」「手順書を書いて」「書き直して」「読みやすくして」「添削して」「分かりにくい所を教えて」「点数をつけて」「やさしい日本語にして」「ASD-STE100の日本語版のように」などの依頼で、標準名を挙げていなくても使う。Use when writing, rewriting, proofreading, or scoring Japanese prose for clarity and plain language.
Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English. Also covers LaTeX layout/typesetting (排版) fixes — loose or sparse pages, stranded section headings, figures that don't fill the page or split across pages, "Float too large", multi-panel figure arrangement, and Supplementary Information that looks empty — via references/latex-layout.md. Also trigger on general academic/scientific writing requests even without the word "Nature", including academic writing, scientific writing, SCI/paper writing, English manuscript polishing, language editing, proofreading, and Chinese phrasings such as 学术写作、科研写作、论文润色、写paper、SCI写作、英文论文润色、语言润色、润色、改写、学术英语、英文写作.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
木下是雄『理科系の作文技術』に基づき、明快で簡潔かつ論理的な日本語を書くためのスキル。ユーザーが `rikakei-writing`、`$rikakei-writing`、またはこのスキルの使用を明示的に指定した場合にのみ使用する。日本語文書の作成、推敲、レビューという理由だけでは使用しない。
日本語のUI文言（ボタン・見出し・ラベル・入力欄の説明・空状態・エラー・確認ダイアログ・完了通知・チャットbotの応答文）を書く・直すときの規則。画面やbotがユーザーに見せる日本語を新しく書く時、既存の文言を見直す・統一する時、英語のまま残った表示を日本語にする時、サーバーのエラーメッセージを画面に出す経路を作る時に使用。公開されている日本語UIガイドライン（SmartHR・デジタル庁・Microsoft・Apple・公用文）の一致点を規則にし、食い違う点は採否と理由を定めてある。境界: 人に宛てた文章（PR本文・メッセージ・ドキュメント）は ukwhatn-writing、画面に何を出すかと提示前の完了基準は context/ui-artifact-standards.md、ナビゲーション・重ね方・通知の型とレイアウトは designing-ui、コードの実装原則は writing-code。
書きたいテーマを質問で掘り下げ、印象的な一文や体験、比喩、考えかけの断片を集めます。構成は決めず、文章の素材を一つのMarkdownファイルに蓄積します。
Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Learns how the user writes from their own sent messages and docs, and builds a voice profile so future drafts sound like them instead of generic AI. The profile is saved as the my-writing-style skill. Use when the user asks to set up, learn, or capture their writing voice, or complains that drafts sound generic or unlike them and no my-writing-style profile exists. Only for drafting text the user will send as themselves, not for Claude's own replies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. For systems venues (OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP), use systems-paper-writing instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to detect, scan, audit, score, or flag AI-writing patterns without rewriting the text, including requests for a deterministic local detector result when the host can execute Node.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a request combines AI-writing audit, rewrite, file editing, voice preservation, false-positive interpretation, verification, or when the user invokes Avoid AI Writing without naming a mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。