466 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
OAuth 2.0 attack checklist: authorization code interception, redirect_uri bypass, CSRF on OAuth flow, state parameter abuse, open redirector chaining, token leakage via Referer, PKCE bypass, and scope escalation. Use when testing OAuth implementations in web apps or bug bounty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect authentication and authorization bypass vulnerabilities including missing auth middleware, JWT algorithm confusion, IDOR, and session fixation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) authentication for React SPAs with MSAL.js and Cloudflare Workers JWT validation using jose library. Full-stack pattern with Authorization Code Flow + PKCE. Prevents 8 documented errors. Use when: implementing Microsoft SSO, troubleshooting AADSTS50058 loops, AADSTS700084 refresh token errors, React Router redirects, setActiveAccount re-render issues, or validating Entra ID tokens in Workers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret and design bounded FIPA communicative-act exchanges using XC00037H semantics while keeping delivery, authority, and external effects separate. NOT for proving delivery, task authorization, or external effect completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks eligible skill candidates with explicit retrieval evidence, capability coverage, and uncertainty. NOT for discovery, authorization, or execution planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a bounded FIPA-style conversation and map it cautiously to JADE behavior APIs. NOT for treating a JADE API example as protocol delivery or application authorization proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。