「classification」の検索結果

Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-61B, the DoD Configuration Management (CM) guidance handbook (7 April 2020, cataloged with Change 1, 2025). Use for defense CM across the acquisition and sustainment life cycle: the five CM functions (planning, identification, control/change management, status accounting, verification & audit), the three configuration baselines (FBL/ABL/PBL) and FCD→ACD→PCD documentation, configuration items (CIs/HWCI/CSCI), change instruments (ECP/NOR/RFV), the CCB and Class I/II classification, CDCA/AA authority, FCA/PCA audits, data management and data rights (CDRL/DID, DFARS rights ladder, master/authoritative source), and tailoring CM by phase (EIA-649-1 R/T/NR matrix, Appendix C templates), plus digital-era CM (digital twin, viewpoints, MOSA). NOTE: 61B is advisory guidance that adopts and points to the SAE EIA-649 / EIA-649-1 / GEIA-HB-649 suite for the authoritative CM requirements — this pack names and describes that suite but does not reproduce its copyrighted requirement text. Thin on: the EIA-649 requirement clauses themselves, form-level detail (DD-form field instructions, full DID content), and non-DoD/commercial CM frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify ideation input, run structural classification, seed fractal ideation folders, and persist engagement/expansion mode

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage API versioning and evolution with URL/header/query strategies, deprecation workflows, breaking change classification, sunset headers, and consumer-driven contract testing. Use when designing versioning strategy, deprecating endpoints, or evolving API contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Codeball — codeBall AI-powered pull request risk assessment including automatic PR quality scoring, risk classification, and auto-approval for low-risk changes. Use when configuring CodeBall for automated PR triage, risk-based review routing, and review workload optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-shot image classification and image-text search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans .NET code for ~50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before starting any significant build or before shipping: problem-framing pre-flight, one-way/two-way door classification, ADR-lite decision logging, and post-ship outcome loop. Complements godmode-shipping (technical gate) and bdbresilience (error recovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: 'intake this repo/skill', 'evaluate external skill', 'should we adopt X', a candidate repo URL plus an adoption question, or any external skill/workflow/tool surfaces as a possible fit for Agistra. Structured front-door evaluation of external skills, workflows, and similar capability artifacts before any install, promotion, or adaptation decision. Ends in exactly one classification: Install candidate, Adapt concept, or Reject. Never install first — intake first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate;

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow-state classification vocabulary for inter-team relay. Maps inbound signals from the remote agent to a routing decision. Intentionally narrow — states and destinations only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data loss prevention policies using Microsoft Purview to protect sensitive information across Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, endpoint devices, and Power BI. The analyst configures sensitivity labels with encryption and content marking, creates DLP policies using built-in and custom sensitive information types with regex patterns, Dağıt:s endpoint DLP rules to control file operations on Windows and macOS devices, and monitors policy effectiveness through Activity Expl...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) using Amazon Macie, Azure Information Protection, and Google Cloud DLP API to discover, classify, and protect sensitive data across cloud storage, databases, and data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tespit etme
unauthorized SaaS and cloud service usage (shadow IT) by analyzing proxy logs, DNS query logs, and netflow data using Python pandas for traffic pattern analysis and domain classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

「学内業務で AI を使う前に『禁止／限定／推奨／開放』のどれに該当するか判定したい」 「既存の機密情報 3 段分類と業務場面を接続したい」 「部署ごとの AI 利用方針を体系化したい」 場面で使う横断スキル。

Classify financial PDFs by extracting company identity, document type, and date metadata. Validates ticker via Yahoo Finance with multi-step fallback. Uses a Python orchestration script for validation, file modification, and writing markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WAF (ModSecurity/AWS WAF/Cloudflare) logs to detect SQL injection attack campaigns. Parses ModSecurity audit logs and JSON WAF event logs to identify SQLi patterns (UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, SLEEP(), BENCHMARK()), tracks attack sources, correlates multi-stage injection attempts, and generates incident reports with OWASP classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect unauthorized SaaS and cloud service usage (shadow IT) by analyzing proxy logs, DNS query logs, and netflow data using Python pandas for traffic pattern analysis and domain classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。