568 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialist — market-pricing a job against salary survey data, scoring a job through a point-factor or IPE job evaluation, running a pay-equity regression or cohort analysis, building or refreshing a salary structure and compa-ratio bands, classifying a job family's FLSA exemption status through the duties test, or modeling benefits plan cost (loss ratio, PEPM, self-funded vs. fully insured). Distinct from hr-people-manager (owns the comp/leveling judgment calls — whether to approve an exception, promote someone into a level), hr-specialist (owns individual-case leave/I-9/ADA/FLSA reclassification for one employee's drifted duties), and compensation-benefits-manager (owns pay philosophy, negotiation-range policy, and the department that runs this work). This role owns the mechanics: the survey match, the point score, the regression, the band math — the analysis those upstream policy and downstream judgment calls are made against.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an astronomer — calculating exposure time or signal-to-noise for a target, writing the feasibility math for a telescope-time proposal, reducing photometric or spectroscopic data, distinguishing a systematic error floor from statistical noise, or reviewing an observational result for calibration or upper-limit red flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain, draft, or validate Obsidian Flavored Markdown syntax: properties, wikilinks, embeds, callouts, tags, comments, highlights, block references, math, and Mermaid. Use when the user explicitly requests Obsidian note formatting or syntax help, not for general Markdown or broad vault operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct editable LaTeX from PDF content using page-aware extraction and visual comparison. Preserve source evidence, flag uncertain math/tables/citations, and distinguish text extraction, OCR, reconstruction, and verified compilation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when creating, deploying, or troubleshooting Salesforce Business Hours and Holidays: the calendars that pause Case escalation rules, entitlement milestones, and Apex BusinessHours math outside working hours. Covers the BusinessHoursSettings metadata, the default calendar, per-region calendars, holiday attachment, the Case Business Hours field, and the BusinessHours Apex class. Trigger keywords: business hours, holidays, SLA clock, escalation not pausing, working hours, support hours, milestone timer weekend. NOT for the escalation rule entries themselves — use admin/escalation-rules. NOT for entitlement process design — use admin/entitlements-and-milestones. NOT for Field Service operating hours or shift scheduling — use admin/fsl-scheduling-setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantum physics expert making counterintuitive concepts accessible while maintaining mathematical rigor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computational mathematics expert for numerical solutions, approximations, error analysis, and scientific computing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in combinatorics, graph theory, discrete probability, and algorithms with applications to computer science
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep game design health assessment across five dimensions: review core loop and progression systems, analyze in-game economy for inflation and sink/source balance, mathematically simulate combat balance and drop rates, audit analytics event coverage, and evaluate monetization ethics..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security checklist for Solidity AMM contracts, liquidity pools, and swap flows. Covers reentrancy, CEI ordering, donation or inflation attacks, oracle manipulation, slippage, admin controls, and integer math.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elicit step-by-step reasoning from language models to boost accuracy on math, logic, and multi-step problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, analyze, and optimize cold outbound email campaigns on Instantly. Handles end-to-end ICP definition, expert panel scoring (recursive to 90+), sequence copywriting, infrastructure audit, capacity planning, and an implementation/strategy doc for human review. Use when asked to build cold outbound sequences, optimize cold email, audit an outbound motion, write sales sequences, or design cold email campaigns. Supports "start from scratch" and "optimize existing" modes. Execution skill — it produces copy, math, and a doc; it does not auto-send. Requires Instantly for audit/send features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
I am a vector of math problems. A tool. Nothing more.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts IRC 664–compliant Charitable Remainder Trust agreements (CRAT/CRUT), covering payout math, remainder qualification, trustee powers, and tax compliance. Use when drafting a CRT, CRAT, CRUT, unitrust, annuity trust, or charitable remainder planning document, or when ensuring IRC 664 compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a mathematically balanced ALTA Settlement Statement for U.S. real estate closings, allocating debits and credits between buyer and seller with prorations, payoffs, lender fees, title charges, and transfer taxes. Enforces balance verification (seller credits minus debits equals cash to seller; buyer debits minus credits equals cash from buyer) and cross-references title commitment, loan documents, and purchase agreement. Use when preparing closing financials, settlement statements, HUD-equivalent documents, or real estate closing allocations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Hanna 2021 ClinVar-scale CBE screen benchmarked on BRCA1/2, Cuella-Martin 2021 DDR saturation), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end; 4-7 for ABE7.10), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Colic et al. 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving greater sensitivity to small-effect hits than MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search arXiv preprint repository for papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and related fields
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the papers that answer a research query in Firecrawl's research paper index — a corpus of paper abstracts whose largest share is biomedical and life-science literature (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv), alongside arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math — using semantic search, semantic and structural expansion, and in-body verification. Use this skill for literature-finding and paper-retrieval tasks of any kind, including clinical, biomedical, drug, gene, disease, and other life-science questions, whether the answer is a single paper or a full multi-paper set. The index is reached only through the `firecrawl_research_*` MCP tools or the `firecrawl research` CLI subcommands. Calling `firecrawl_search` with its `categories` option set to `["research"]` is a different feature — it filters ordinary web search to research-affiliated websites (the list includes PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, and publisher sites) and returns page results from them, without querying the paper records in this index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。