「audit」の検索結果

Deep-review-first audit for Chinese and English academic papers across LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats. Use whenever the user wants reviewer-style paper critique, pre-submission readiness checks, pass/fail gate decisions, structured revision roadmaps, or re-audits of revised manuscripts. Trigger even if the user only says "review my paper", "check if this is ready to submit", "audit this PDF", "simulate peer review", "find the biggest problems in this manuscript", or "re-check whether I fixed the review issues". Do not use for direct source editing or compilation-heavy repair; route those to the format-specific writing skills instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Google Ads account audit and business context setup. Use for account-health audits and business-context setup. Trigger on "audit my ads", "ads audit", "set up my ads", "onboard", "account overview", "how's my account", "ads health check", "what should I fix in my ads", or when the user is new to NotFair and hasn't run an audit before.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the developer experience of a product, SDK, docs site, or SKILL.md by dropping multiple Claude subagents at it with only a tiny task prompt and real tools (WebFetch, Bash, Write). Agents must discover the docs themselves, install deps, ask for credentials if needed, and attempt real execution. The skill captures each agent's trace — tool calls, retries, wall time, errors — and scores on Setup Friction, Speed, Efficiency, Error Recovery, and Doc Quality, then emits an HTML report with an A–F grade and concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to audit agent experience, test a skill, audit docs for agents, check if a SDK is agent-friendly, validate a SKILL.md, measure agent DX, or benchmark how painful onboarding is for an AI agent. Triggers: 'audit agent experience', 'test this skill', 'audit docs for agents', 'is my SDK agent-friendly', 'run a DX audit', 'agent experience test', 'test my docs', 'how do agents do with my product'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Workspace setup inventory and gaps: map repository, skill, prompt, plugin, MCP, hook, config, and runtime surfaces before strengthening or operating OMH. Use when the user says: workspace-audit, workspace audit, repo surface audit, repository surface audit, workspace surface audit, repo inventory, surface inventory, skill inventory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Accumulated tech debt to rank: build the severity-by-effort debt ledger from observed repo evidence - orient, audit the named dimensions with file:line citations, rank fixes and quick wins - and reconcile RESOLVED/NEW/CARRIED against the previous ledger on rerun. Use when the user says: tech-debt-audit, tech debt, tech debt audit, technical debt, technical debt audit, tech debt ledger, debt ledger, audit our tech debt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive WCAG accessibility audit covering perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to audit accessibility, review WCAG compliance, fix accessibility issues, prepare for accessibility certification, address an accessibility lawsuit risk, or systematically improve a site's accessibility. Triggers on accessibility audit, WCAG audit, a11y audit, accessibility compliance, ADA compliance, screen reader test, keyboard navigation, accessibility report, fix accessibility, axe scan. Also triggers when accessibility issues have been reported and need systematic remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISMS auditing for ISO 27001 compliance, control assessment, and certification support. Use for ISMS audit programs, internal/external ISO 27001 audits, ISO 27002 Annex A control testing, and Stage 1/Stage 2 certification audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit affiliate blog posts and landing pages for SEO issues. Triggers on: "audit my blog post for SEO", "check my SEO", "SEO review", "improve my rankings", "SEO checklist", "on-page SEO audit", "keyword optimization check", "why isn't my page ranking", "SEO score", "content quality audit", "check my meta tags", "internal linking audit", "quick SEO wins".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit preparation register: required document, period covered, request and receipt dates, preparer and reviewer, auditor queries and adjustments. Use for assembling an audit file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit follow-up and verification processes including follow-up scheduling, remediation effectiveness testing, finding closure criteria, re-testing procedures, status reporting, and escalation of unremediated findings. Implements IIA Standard 2500 monitoring requirements and ISO 19011 follow-up guidance for privacy audit engagements. Keywords: audit follow-up, verification testing, finding closure, remediation effectiveness, re-testing, follow-up audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a whole-registry sweep of Gaia — fan out 13 parallel audit agents across every skill, run adversarial verification, surface Semantic Fusion candidates, propose new generic skill references, and synthesize a publish-ready HTML report under docs/meta/reports/. Use this skill for broad, systemic analysis across many skills at once: "run a meta sweep", "sweep the meta", "full meta audit", "audit the whole registry against META.md", "widespread nomenclature issues", "find all skills missing a GitHub link", "produce a meta report", "check for evidence type mismatches across the registry", "find skills that document a third-party tool with no attribution", or explicitly types /gaia-meta-sweep. This is the registry-wide macro companion to /gaia-meta-audit (a prioritized queue, single-pass) and /gaia-audit (fixes one skill). Use it when you need the full surface — 13 audit dimensions, adversarial verification, fusion proposals, and a durable findings artifact — not just a queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a user flow for friction and drop-off points. Use when the user says "UX audit", "audit this flow", "where are users dropping off", "why isn't this converting", "review the onboarding", "usability audit", "what's causing friction", "user journey review", or wants to identify why users struggle with a flow - even if they don't explicitly say "UX audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a control list and an audit scope into draft evidence requests grouped by control owner, each with the control as stated, the audit period, evidence examples (commonly requested) and a proposed due date derived from the fieldwork dates. Never judges whether evidence is sufficient, never selects the sample and never sends a request; the auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the evidence requests", "draft the PBC list", "build the evidence request pack for the audit" or "what do we need to ask each control owner for". Do not use for document requests and interview questions built from an audit plan, use audit-prep-pack instead; to check claims in a report against sources, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository または subsystem を対象に、source-only で明示的なセキュリティ監査を行う entry skill。 通常の PR セキュリティレビューとは分離し、reconnaissance、scope 固定、既存 security skill への委譲、 evidence と unresolved hypothesis、observe-only SecurityAuditCoverage、coverage critic、 structured audit artifact と repeat-run coverage を扱う。target-controlled code は実行しない。

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

プロジェクト文書の整理依頼を適切な専門スキルへ振り分け、文書の役割、リンク、設計判断の索引、根拠への参照を、ファイルを変更せずに点検するスキルです。

• プロジェクト文書の整理手順を選びたいとき
• 既存文書の情報源を把握したいとき
• ローカルリンクと設計判断の索引の点検

公開前や変更の取り込み後に、アプリの認証・データ・決済・運用を根拠付きで点検します。公開を妨げる問題と優先して直す項目を、本番への準備状況としてまとめるスキル。

• 公開前に本番への準備状況を確認したいとき
• 変更の取り込み後にリスクを確認したいとき
• CI通過後の本番リスクの点検

Audit a python-pptx export against its source HTML deck, identify layout/content drift (footer overflow, cropped content, missing italic/em, lost styling, off-rhythm spacing), and re-export with strict footer-rail + cursor-flow layout discipline. Use this skill whenever the user has a .pptx that was generated from an HTML slide deck and asks to compare/audit/verify/fix the export — including phrases like "compare ppt with html", "fidelity audit", "fix the pptx", "ppt is cut off", "footer overlap", "italic missing in pptx", "re-export the deck", "pptx-html-fidelity-audit", or any case where a python-pptx → HTML round-trip needs verification or repair. Also trigger when the user shows you a deck.html and a deck.pptx side by side and is debugging visual differences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit MCP (Model Context Protocol) server configurations for security issues. Use this skill when: - Reviewing .mcp.json files for security risks - Checking MCP server args for hardcoded secrets or shell injection patterns - Validating that MCP package-runner dependencies use exact reviewed versions, not bare names, @latest, or ranges - Detecting mutable npm/npx, bunx, pnpm dlx, yarn dlx, and npm exec references in MCP configurations - Auditing which MCP servers a project registers and whether they're on an approved list - Checking for environment variable usage vs. hardcoded credentials in MCP configs - Any request like "is my MCP config secure?", "audit my MCP servers", or "check .mcp.json" keywords: [mcp, security, audit, secrets, shell-injection, supply-chain, governance]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。