「checkpoints」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to orchestrate defect image generation with NVIDIA Cosmos AnomalyGen (Cosmos-Predict2-derived) on OSMO for PCBA, metal surface, and glass inspection. The Day 0 path handles cold-start with USD-to-ROI, image-edit augmentation, and AnomalyGen to create initial PCBA datasets. The Day 1 path performs inference and labeling on real images. This skill helps with first-time asset setup, creation of finetuning checkpoints, and configuring deployment. Trigger keywords: defect image generation, dig workflow, dig pipeline, defect image detection workflow, aoi pipeline, aoi anomalygen, usd2roi anomalygen, day 0 pcba, day 1 pcba, day 1 real-photo alignment, day 1 manual roi, metal surface anomaly, glass defect, anomalygen finetune, setup_pcb, setup_metal, setup_glass, setup_pretrained, dig setup, dig datasets, dig pretrained checkpoint, dig image-edit endpoint, cosmos defect generation, cosmos-predict2 defect, cosmos-anomalygen, cosmos predict2 finetune.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, configure, and chain repo-native Nemotron customization steps into single-step or multi-step pipelines: curation, translation, SFT/PEFT (AutoModel or Megatron-Bridge), pretraining/CPT, RL alignment (DPO/RLVR/GRPO/RLHF), BYOB/MCQ benchmarks, checkpoint conversion, ModelOpt optimization, env profiles, and evaluation of trained checkpoints or existing/hosted endpoints. Use when a request names a Nemotron step or workflow, or asks to clean, translate, train, fine-tune, align, convert, optimize, evaluate, or compose these into a pipeline. Do NOT use for frontend/dashboard/visualization work, generic ML advice, billing/access, or non-Nemotron coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the root-level workflow runtime policy or rule-based rollouts and verify simulator success. Use for evaluation, checkpoints, or local controllers; do not use for replay or dataset annotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue KERMT pretraining on a custom SMILES corpus with a grover_base, cmim, or hybrid checkpoint. Use a local checkpoint or optionally download a pinned Hugging Face model bundle using HF_TOKEN if configured. Run containerized training and write model bundles, prepared data, logs, and checkpoints to user-selected host directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Context window or token budget at risk: plan compact context, token/cost budgets, summarization checkpoints, and overflow recovery before long agent work. Use when the user says: context-budget-review, context budget review, context budget, token budget review, token budget, prompt budget, prompt caching, prompt cache.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. Use when work ships without consistent review. For running one individual session, use `design-critique`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a spec or requirement into a written plan a separate session or agent can execute, then drives that plan through review checkpoints. Use this before touching code on any multi-step task, when work needs handing to someone else, when a task keeps sprawling mid-implementation, or when a plan exists and needs executing in order with verification between steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints between batches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined execution of approved plans with step-by-step verification, phase checkpoints, failure investigation, and mandatory code/security reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hierarchical coordination and drift detection with frequent checkpoints, shared memory coherence validation, role specialization enforcement, and short task cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-backed state management for safe rollback. Create and restore checkpoints with tagged commits and metadata tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smallest personal narrated-explainer-video pipeline (spoken narration over visuals, not an audio podcast), fully tool-agnostic and autonomous by default — topic → research ∥ asset collection → script → TTS → video → 4K render ∥ publish info + cover. The skill defines the pipeline logic and self-verified checkpoints; any TTS backend and any video tool (Remotion, HyperFrames, CapCut, ...) work, and how much human oversight to apply is set by the working project's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, not here. Use when the user wants a quick personal narrated video with minimal steps, whether or not they name the tool stack. Do NOT trigger for audio-only podcasts, written episodic content, or heavy multi-format production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates explicit validation checkpoints (verification gates) between project phases to catch errors early and ensure quality before proceeding. Use when the user asks about quality gates, milestone checks, phase transitions, approval steps, go/no-go decision points, or preventing cascading errors across a multi-step workflow. Produces acceptance criteria checklists, automated CI gate configurations, manual sign-off requirements, and conditional review rules for scenarios such as security changes, API changes, or database migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CP-7 retrospective: audit checkpoints, evidence quality, action items, and harvest candidates. Closes the V-model cycle and feeds the next run. Use via /retro after ship, escalate, or significant session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement an existing spec through committed passes. Use for long or multi-pass specs that need maintenance checkpoints to periodically clean code, handoffs, priorities, and plan bloat before drift accumulates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw MATLAB code into a published .mltbx toolbox — full pipeline from scope definition through packaging and release. Drives 8 phases with human checkpoints, enforcing ordering and dependencies. Use when asked to package, create a toolbox, or run the files-to-package pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and persist structured presentation requirements for Codex Slides, including scenario choice, audience, page count, language, format, research mode, visual direction, source-file roles, and clarification checkpoints. Use when a new deck request is ambiguous or scenario-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, improving, finding, or auditing agent skills - the user says 'create a skill', 'do I have a skill for X', 'improve the X skill', 'which skill should I use', asks whether a skill exists for a task, or wants to validate, test, evaluate, package, or health-check skills. Also use for skill ecosystem maintenance (duplicate detection, stale skills, trigger collisions) and advisor checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。