1,212 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reference definitions for the Agent Forge orchestration roles (lead, worker, planner, evaluator). Use when coordinating multi-agent Forge work or when you need one role's responsibilities and constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trimmed Forge pipeline (scope → build → wrap) for small, clear-scope work. Use when the user runs /forgemaster-mini or has a small, well-scoped task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route a task by complexity and run the gated Forge pipeline (research → plan → implement → ship). Use when the user runs /forgemaster or wants the full guided feature pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Host modded Minecraft servers (CurseForge, Modrinth).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove a personal fact, preference, relationship detail, topic, or prior event from Muse's active memory and stop existing copies or automations from bringing it back. Use for explicit requests such as 'forget that', 'don't remember this about me', or 'remove that from your memory'. Do not use when 'forget it' merely means cancel the current task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE deploying to an EVM chain. Also enforces key hygiene (no plaintext private keys, encrypted cast keystore) and a secure deploy workflow. Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or deploying Solidity/Foundry contracts, building a dApp, or working with forge/cast/anvil, MetaMask, or Web3/DeFi code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FastGPT CI workflow 双轨同步。当用户修改或新增 .github/workflows/ 下的 GitHub Actions workflow 时必须触发：同步更新 .forgejo/workflows/ 对应文件保持功能一致，或判断是否需要新建 Forgejo 版本。涉及 CI、GitHub Actions、Forgejo Actions、镜像构建、container registry、artifact、workflow yaml 改动、build-* workflow、test-* workflow 时也使用此技能。即使用户只提到"改一下 CI"或"加个 workflow"也应触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE deploying to an EVM chain. Also enforces key hygiene (no plaintext private keys, encrypted cast keystore) and a secure deploy workflow. Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or deploying Solidity/Foundry contracts, building a dApp, or working with forge/cast/anvil, MetaMask, or Web3/DeFi code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate FrontendIntegration resources and the frontend-forge extension. Use when Codex needs to create a FrontendIntegration from FrontendIntegration YAML, update or patch FI lifecycle state, inspect or troubleshoot FI build output, or create, enable, disable, uninstall, and inspect the frontend-forge extension through its InstallPlan and extension resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt JWT cryptographic failures — alg:none signature-stripping and RS256→HS256 key-confusion that let an attacker forge a token for any identity (e.g. an admin) without knowing a secret. Use when the app authenticates with a JSON Web Token (an `eyJ...` Bearer token in the Authorization header, a cookie, or a login response). This skill OWNS JWT signature/crypto forgery (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku header injection); hunt-ato covers JWT as one ATO path, hunt-auth-bypass covers SSO/SAML token trust, hunt-api-misconfig covers non-crypto JWT handling. Critical when a forged token grants access to another user's data or an admin-only endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
アウトラインやリサーチ結果から、体裁の揃った提案スライド（自己完結HTML・16:9）を組み立てるスキル。「スライドにして」「提案デッキを作って」「スライド化」「slide forge」などのリクエストで使用する。
1Forge integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 1Forge data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting any conversation involving bundle-plugins — blueprinting, scaffolding, authoring, auditing, testing, optimizing, or releasing. Also use when feeling unsure which bundles-forge skill applies
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured feature specifications through a collaborative product interview. Acts as a senior PM and business analyst pair — arrives with a point of view, challenges scope, proposes options at every decision. Composes the requirement-quality atom for spec quality enforcement and collaborative-judgment for surfacing genuine decisions. Produces an epic/feature hierarchy in .lattice/requirements/ that serves as direct input to design-blueprint. Use when the user says 'forge requirements', 'write requirements', 'spec this feature', 'create a feature spec', 'define this epic', 'write a PRD', 'spec out what we are building', or 'requirement forge'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a structured conversation to define requirement standards for a project — epic and feature definitions, scenario structure, AC format, priority notation, status workflow, and naming conventions. Produces a formal requirement-standards.md that the requirement-quality atom reads via config resolution, customising its embedded defaults for the team's product process. Use when setting up a new project, defining product standards, or when the user says 'set up requirement standards', 'define feature standards', 'configure requirement forge', 'define how features should be structured', or 'requirement forge refiner'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain and configure individual spacing algorithms using student performance data and forgetting curves. Use when personalising retention schedules in adaptive learning platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, update, replace and remove installed ForgeCat profiles. Use when the user asks what's installed, sees modified files, wants to upgrade or roll back a profile, run two profiles side by side, or configure MCP env vars.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find, evaluate and install a ForgeCat profile. Use when the user wants to browse the registry, compare profiles, install one into a project or a home-target agent, or when an install is refused.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to forge, scaffold, author, or ship a new skill or agent — the skill-creator's own namesake artifacts. Drives the skill-forge loop (create → fill → validate → critique → ship → publish) via the skill-creator CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have captured session evidence — session-retro / session- observatory-live traces in .planning/patterns/, tool logs, correction records — and want to induce a reusable skill from it. Segments the traces into candidate skill units (an LLM judgment, not a deterministic parse) and decomposes each candidate into a four-part structured spec: workflow structure, execution semantics, and runtime attachments (verification, safety, rollback, state). It emits a spec object, NOT a finished SKILL.md, and hands that spec to skill-forge. It sits between skill-integration (upstream frequency detector) and skill-forge (downstream author). Backed by Agent-Trace-to-Skill Induction (arxiv 2606.06893v1). Triggers on inducing a skill from captured traces, turning a repeated pattern into a skill spec, and preparing evidence for skill-forge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to forge, scaffold, or author a new cartridge — content cartridge, department cartridge, or chipset bundle. Drives the cartridge-forge loop (scaffold → fill → gate checks → commit) via the skill-creator cartridge CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate frontend code drafts using Gemini 3.1 Pro's one-shot UI generation. Use when building React components, HTML/CSS pages, SVG animations, or converting screenshots to code. Produces fast, cheap drafts (7.5x cheaper than Opus) that Claude reviews and refines. Supports design system context loading (1M token window), screenshot-to-code pipeline, and physics-based SVG animation. Trigger: "generate a UI", "screenshot to code", "draft a component", "SVG animation", "convert this design", "gemini forge", "forge a UI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。