2,096 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Map, measure and improve business processes — SIPOC and swimlane capture, cycle-time and bottleneck analysis, handoff diagnosis, and a payback-ranked improvement backlog. Use when a process is slow, error-prone, or crosses too many teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Part 12 continuous improvement loop into a quarterly brief for leadership. "produce the quarterly improvement brief"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to analyze a current work session and propose improvements to skills. Use (1) automatically after working with a skill to capture learnings, (2) when the user suggests improvements, corrections, or additions during a skill-related session, or (3) when the user manually invokes `self-improve`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate project context. Use when the user asks to check, audit, review, update, improve, or fix their AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, mentions "project rules maintenance" or "agent context optimization", or when the codebase has changed enough that the rules file may be stale. Scans the repository for every rules file, grades each against a quality rubric, outputs a quality report, and applies targeted edits only after user approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need framework-agnostic OpenAPI 3.x guidance — spec structure, metadata and versioning, paths and operations, reusable schemas, security schemes, examples, documentation quality, contract validation (e.g. Spectral), breaking-change awareness, and handoffs to codegen — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review an OpenAPI; Improve an OpenAPI; Improve API contract; Improve API schema design. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Quarkus REST (Jakarta REST) — including resource classes, HTTP methods, status codes, request/response DTOs, Bean Validation, exception mappers, optional runtime OpenAPI exposure (SmallRye), contract-first generation from OpenAPI, content negotiation, pagination, sorting and filtering, API versioning, idempotency (Idempotency-Key), optimistic concurrency (ETag / If-Match), HTTP caching (Cache-Control), API deprecation (Sunset / Deprecation headers), RFC 7807 Problem Details, ISO-8601 for time in contracts, and security-aware boundaries. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve JAX-RS resources in a Quarkus project; Design HTTP APIs with validation and error handling on Quarkus; Add API versioning, idempotency, ETag concurrency, or deprecation headers; Implement pagination, sorting, or RFC 7807 Problem Details error responses; Improve Quarkus REST resources and exception mappers. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Micronaut — including @Controller routes, HTTP status codes, DTOs, Bean Validation, exception handlers, pagination, idempotency, ETag/If-Match, caching headers, versioning, contract-first OpenAPI (OpenAPI Generator), optional runtime OpenAPI via micronaut-openapi, and security annotations. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve Micronaut @Controller REST APIs; Add validation, error handling, or align controllers with the OpenAPI contract on Micronaut HTTP layer; Design Micronaut controllers and DTO validation; Add Micronaut exception handlers and Problem Details responses; Improve pagination filtering or OpenAPI alignment in Micronaut APIs. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to review, improve, or troubleshoot a Maven pom.xml file — including dependency management with BOMs, plugin configuration, version centralization, multi-module project structure, build profiles, or any situation where you want to align your Maven setup with industry best practices. This should trigger for requests such as Review pom.xml to improve it; Apply Maven best practices to pom.xml; Improve Maven POM configuration; Review Maven dependency management and plugin configuration; Modernize Maven build conventions for a Java project. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Generics; Apply Generics; Refactor the code with Generics; Improve generic type safety in Java APIs; Fix raw types and unchecked casts in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get one actionable improvement for your AI product based on the latest GenAI PM briefs. Fetch the last 5 days of curated AI PM insights from genaipm.com, analyze the current repo/project, find synergy between trending topics and the user's work, then research the source material and apply a concrete improvement. Use when the user wants to improve their AI product, get coaching on AI PM best practices, apply the latest industry insights to their codebase, or run "/one-step-better-ai-pm". Requires a GenAI PM subscriber email (set GENAIPM_EMAIL env var or provide when prompted).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OFFLINE FALLBACK for the claude-md-management plugin - prefer that plugin when it is installed. Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files - scan for CLAUDE.md files, evaluate quality against templates, output a report, then make targeted updates. Invoke explicitly (/claude-md-improver) when the plugin is unavailable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes and improves prompts using 31 frameworks across 7 intent categories. Use when a user wants to improve, rewrite, structure, or engineer a prompt — including requests like "help me write a better prompt", "improve this prompt", "what framework should I use", "make this prompt more effective", or any prompt engineering task. Recommends the right framework based on intent (create, transform, reason, critique, recover, clarify, agentic), asks targeted questions, and delivers a structured, high-quality result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore a codebase to find opportunities for architectural improvement, focusing on making the codebase more testable by deepening shallow modules. Use when user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, implement, or review claude.md improver work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests claude.md improver work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative rubric-based evaluation and self-improvement loop. Builds a scoring rubric interactively, evaluates an artifact with multiple models in parallel (Codex, Gemini, Claude), then autonomously improves the artifact one criterion at a time until a score threshold is met or circuit breaker fires. "/rulph", "rubric evaluate", "rubric score", "multi-model evaluate", "score and improve", "evaluate and iterate", "grade this", "루브릭 루프", "채점 루프", "자율 개선", "개선 루프", "루브릭 평가"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility (a11y) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit) and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and improve documentation for ComfyUI nodes in per-node JSON files. Use when asked to document nodes, write node descriptions, add tips to nodes, improve node docs, enrich node content, fill in empty node descriptions, or batch-write documentation for new/updated nodes. Also triggers on "write docs for nodes", "document the new nodes", "improve node tips", "fill in node descriptions", "enrich nodes", "node content pass", "update nodes", "sync comfyui nodes", "new comfyui version", or "node enrichment".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills. Use when you have accumulated feedback data and want to improve review accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-improvement loop for multi-agent workflows. Diagnose failures, improve tool descriptions, and learn from success/failure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold and run Karpathy-style autoresearch loops in any git repo. This skill should be used when setting up autonomous code improvement, generating adversarial eval harnesses, running hypothesis-implement-eval-keep/discard loops, or checking autoresearch progress. Triggers on "autoresearch", "autonomous improvement", "eval loop", "hypothesis loop", "self-improvement loop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。