「missing」の検索結果

Scan a codebase for missing, janky, or inconsistent UI motion and fix it with transitions.dev recipes. ALWAYS use this skill when the user's message is or contains a transitions-agent command (npx transitions-agent, npx transitions-agent fix, any variant) - the command is a request for the full guided flow, not just command execution. Also use when the user asks about UI transitions, animations, motion quality, a motion score, janky or missing transitions, "polish the motion", "fix the animations", or whether the motion is good after UI changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run comprehensive quality checks on tabular data (CSV/Excel/TSV/JSON), detecting missing values, duplicates, outliers, format issues, and type inconsistencies to produce an overall score, grade, and actionable suggestions. Triggered when users ask to check data quality, find missing or duplicate values, detect outliers, validate formats, profile data, or clean data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The exact column header names required by the TRES Finance bulk transaction CSV upload. Use whenever building, fixing, or validating the header row of a TRES manual transaction or sub-transaction upload CSV — especially after an upload fails with "Missing required column(s): ...". Trigger phrases include: 'fix my CSV headers', 'bulk transaction upload failed', 'missing required columns', 'validate TRES upload CSV', 'transaction CSV template headers'. This skill is ONLY about the header naming convention; it does not cover row values or upload workflow. Do NOT trigger for contacts import CSV (use tres-import-contacts), wallet upload CSV (use tres-wallets-upload), or general CSV parsing unrelated to bulk TX upload headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International / multilingual SEO audit focused on hreflang correctness: missing or broken return tags, wrong language/region codes, missing x-default, self-referencing errors, hreflang vs canonical conflicts, and inconsistent signals across HTML head, HTTP headers and XML sitemap. Also reviews URL structure (ccTLD vs subdirectory vs subdomain), language targeting and geo signals. Use whenever the user runs a multi-language or multi-region site and asks about hreflang, international or multilingual SEO, the wrong-language page showing in search, or duplicate content across country versions. Trigger on: "hreflang", "international SEO", "multilingual SEO", "multi-region", "wrong language in Google", "x-default", "ccTLD vs subdirectory", "geo targeting", "language targeting", "my English page shows for Thai users", "th/en page ranking in the wrong country", or any cross-language/cross-country ranking question. For full-site audits use /seo-analysis; for a single URL use /seo-page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when NeMo Relay is installed or imported but application-side runtime behavior is missing or incorrect, including load failures, inactive scopes, missing events, and plugin or adaptive wiring problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weighted by must, should, could) with the missing list in build order, plus a screenshot layout diff that ignores colour so a rebrand does not count against you. Two standard-library Python tools. Use when the user says "how close is my clone", "compare it to the original", "what's missing", "parity check", "diff the screens", "is it ready", or after /replica-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches the app being cloned and reads what its real users say in public reviews (App Store, Google Play, G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit, Hacker News, its own feature-request board), then ranks what they hate, what is missing and what is unsolved, turns it into a fix plan for the clone and a positioning angle you can sell. Every quote is real, verbatim and linked. Use when the user says "what do people hate about X", "read the reviews", "how do I make mine better", "find the gap", "what features are missing", "how do I position this", "make it sellable", or after /replica-diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when filtering genes with high missingness and then imputing missing values in a bulk expression matrix with group-aware KNN through DMwR2, where donor samples are restricted by one annotation column before imputation. For strata with 10 or fewer samples, the script falls back to row-wise direct filling with mean or median. NOT for: single-cell data, multi-column stratification, non-tabular inputs, network access, or interactive workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies critical clauses and protections that should be in a contract but are missing, with urgency ratings and ready-to-insert language

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /audit on a greenfield project, an existing codebase with missing docs, or one area (/audit src/auth) to bootstrap the project's AI context, the AGENTS.md files every later skill reads. Writes tool agnostic AGENTS.md plus thin CLAUDE.md pointers, adding only what is missing; never overwrites curated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validation or test coverage is missing on a phase that already shipped. Audits or reconstructs VALIDATION.md, fills the gaps and generates the missing test files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when .planning/ looks inconsistent, files are missing, or state seems wrong. Validates .planning/ integrity, reports missing files, bad config, and orphaned plans, and --repair fixes what it finds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, or missing/overwritten outputs in multi-project or multi-targeting builds where bin/obj (or project.assets.json) collide. Common causes: shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, extra global properties (e.g. PublishReadyToRun), or SetTargetFramework on a ProjectReference to a single-targeting project. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns; broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets); targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn); query targets returning stale results from Outputs vs Returns misuse; missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds; missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, and the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them. USE FOR: reviewing a pull request or patch in a .NET repository; checking for behavioral regressions, API misuse, or missing tests; auditing architectural or framework-specific. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reverse engineering tools are missing, not working, or need configuration. Installation guides for radare2 (r2), Ghidra, GDB, QEMU, Frida, binutils, and cross-compilation toolchains. Keywords - "install radare2", "setup ghidra", "r2 not found", "qemu missing", "tool not installed", "configure gdb", "cross-compiler"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix misleading Flutter/Dart test failures where expected data is empty ([]) or default values instead of the mocked response, caused by stale Mockito generated mocks or missing stubs being silently swallowed by try/catch in provider/repository code. Use when: (1) Test expects non-empty data but gets [], (2) Mock stubs for a method are set up but the code under test returns fallback/empty results, (3) A PR added new methods to a service class and tests that previously passed now fail with misleading "expected X, actual: empty" assertions, (4) "Generated files are out of date" CI error alongside test failures. The root cause is MissingStubError thrown by unstubbed mock methods, caught by production try/catch blocks, causing silent fallback to empty state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that design documents, code implementations, and tests fully cover all specified requirements. Use this skill when validating requirement traceability, conducting design reviews, assessing implementation completeness, checking test coverage against requirements, performing compliance audits, or identifying missing functionality. Produces coverage reports showing which requirements are satisfied, partially satisfied, or missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。