「procedural」の検索結果

Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

No Inference / Source-Locked Verification. Forces Claude to answer ONLY from user-provided materials and/or online sources actually accessed — no inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source. Use whenever Claude reviews documents, summarises evidence, checks accuracy, drafts submissions, creates timelines, extracts facts, checks citations, analyses rules, prepares legal arguments, compares documents, verifies claims, produces chronologies, works from uploaded materials, performs legal research, checks case status, or does anything where evidential fidelity matters. Also trigger on: 'source-locked', 'no inference', 'only from the materials', 'don't assume', 'stick to the evidence', 'verify this', 'check this is right', 'work from the documents'. Overrides Claude's default tendency to fill gaps. If evidential accuracy matters, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic palette/matrix pixel art (not AI). Use for procedural tile art, color-quantized output, matrix sprites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an object or character reference image into a quality-gated, animation-ready procedural Three.js model built in code. Use for image-to-3D reconstruction, detail-accurate object rebuilds, stylized/likeness-maximized human characters, sculpt specs, and staged code generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies an ASD-STE100-derived register to operator and procedural text. Use when writing runbooks or steps. Do not use for docstrings, ADRs, or rationale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blender PBR and stylized material creation for metal, wood, concrete, fabric, glass, dirt, rust, and procedural shaders. Use for look development, material reuse, and production shading in Blender via MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or improve procedural risograph still art, illustrations, posters, print series and images in this repo. Develops reference-led composition, perspective, pose and ink plates; delivers a native-resolution PNG and self-contained Canvas 2D source. Use for standalone still requests; use riso-film for moving work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, build or improve procedural risograph animations and videos in this repo, including narrative films, abstract shorts, motion effects and visual inspection. Delivers self-contained Canvas 2D HTML and a verified MP4. For standalone still art use riso-still; for sound use riso-score. Not for editing tools/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggests rollback strategies for failed deployments across different platforms and failure types. Use when deployments fail and need to be reverted, including application code rollbacks, database migration reversions, infrastructure changes, and configuration updates. Supports Docker/Docker Compose environments with step-by-step procedural guidance for safe and effective rollback execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Blender scenes and assets for topology, transforms, normals, surface continuity, classified connections, intersections, modifier/node intent, procedural performance, simulation stability, protected-scene changes, and fixed-view visual evidence. Use after every major modeling or simulation stage and before render, bake, export, or claims of completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build efficient Blender repetition, Array-driven stairs/modules/openings, instancing, scattering, Bezier/NURBS curve-profile geometry, Geometry Nodes fields, repeat zones, simulation zones, particle-like systems, and collective motion. Use for stairs, railings, trim, pipes, cables, repeated windows/panels, vegetation, debris, crowds, rain, snow, modular structures, or any request involving dependent elements or reusable parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate production-grade Blender work by probing the installed Blender version, retrieving relevant official Blender documentation, assigning visual design intent, classifying shape grammar and geometry/deformation/procedural/physics/shading needs, comparing direct Blender components with node systems, creating staged artifacts, and routing to specialist skills. Use for every non-trivial Blender creation, reconstruction, simulation, animation, environment, or scene-modification request, especially when the user does not know whether to use topology, Boolean, Array, curves, snapping, Displace, simulation, Geometry Nodes, or shading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production guidance for planning, building, animating, capturing, and reviewing complete Three.js scenes for rendered media. Use for browser-native 3D product shots, title sequences, procedural worlds, glTF scene assembly, camera and lighting animation, shaders, post-processing, deterministic frame export, and Three.js render QA; not for modeling standalone assets, WebXR interaction, or generic website decoration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master AI-powered game asset pipelines using ComfyUI, Stable Diffusion, FLUX, ControlNet, and IP-Adapter. Creates production-ready sprites, textures, UI, and environments with consistency, proper licensing, and game engine integration. Use when "AI game art, generate game assets, ComfyUI game, stable diffusion sprites, AI texture generation, character consistency AI, procedural art generation, SDXL game assets, FLUX textures, train LoRA game, AI tileable texture, spritesheet generation, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentence-level and section-level craft for instructions Claude will actually follow, in any container — project instructions, a standalone prompt, or skill body text. Use when the text exists or is being drafted and the question is quality: "why is Claude ignoring this instruction", "rewrite this prompt so it works", "improve my project instructions", "make this instruction stick", "is this too prescriptive", "how much structure does Sonnet need versus Opus". Covers imperative construction, positive framing, strategic-versus-procedural calibration per model, extended thinking, complexity scaling, and a quality checklist. For deciding WHICH container the instruction belongs in, use crafting-instructions. For building, testing and packaging a whole skill directory, use creating-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill Opus-level reasoning into optimized instructions for Haiku 5.5 (and Sonnet). Generates explicit, procedural prompts with n-shot examples that maximize smaller model performance on a given task. Use when user says "down-skill", "distill for Haiku", "optimize for Haiku", "make this work on Haiku", "generate Haiku instructions", or needs to delegate a task to a smaller model with high reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive GLSL shader techniques for creating stunning visual effects — ray marching, SDF modeling, fluid simulation, particle systems, procedural generation, lighting, post-processing, and more.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or improves an Agent Skill by defining a precise trigger boundary, concise procedural instructions, progressive-disclosure references, deterministic helpers, routing evals, and validation evidence. Use when authoring or reviewing SKILL.md, skill metadata, bundled references, or skill packaging. Not for ordinary project documentation or application code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and assign PBR materials in Blender via Principled BSDF — metals, glass, plastic, fabric, skin, organics. Covers physically-based material recipes with real-world values, Coat layer (varnish/car paint), Sheen (cloth), Subsurface scattering (skin/wax), Transmission (glass), and procedural patterns (wood grain, marble, fabric weave). Use whenever the user asks to "make it look like X material", "give it a metallic finish", "apply a wood texture", "make this glass / plastic / brushed steel / leather / skin", or any look-development request. Make sure to use this skill even if the user does not say "material" — also covers "make it shiny", "matte finish", "looks like copper", "rough surface". Works with any geometry; pairs with blender-lighting (materials only look right under proper lighting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。