「reference」の検索結果

SharedPreferences (v2.5.5) for Flutter providing simple persistent key-value storage for non-sensitive user settings and app preferences. Use this skill when storing user preferences (theme mode, language selection, font size), app settings and configuration, feature flags or A/B test assignments, simple cache data, onboarding completion status, last selected values (filters, sort options), user consent flags, or any non-sensitive data that survives app restarts. Supports String, int, double, bool, and StringList types. NOT suitable for storing tokens, passwords, API keys, or any sensitive/encrypted data (use flutter_secure_storage instead). Ideal for quick persistent storage without database overhead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a reference system that returns the right reference in under 60 seconds. Use when setting up a design reference library, reorganizing existing collections, or helping teams build shared reference systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing MongoDB schemas, defining Mongoose models, choosing embed-vs-reference, or adding indexes. Trigger words: スキーマ設計, モデル定義, Mongoose, コレクション, インデックス, 埋め込み, 参照, embed, reference, index.

Generate ideas that don't sound logical, then validate them with cheap behavioural experiments — Rory Sutherland's 'the opposite of a good idea can be a good idea' plus revealed-preference testing. Use when the obvious/logical solution is saturated and the user wants genuinely different options, asks 'what's a creative/unconventional angle', 'how do we stand out', 'should we run a test/experiment', 'how do we know what people actually want', or is about to trust a survey/focus group. Covers deliberate inversion of the obvious move, why stated preferences lie, and designing small reversible experiments that watch behaviour. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「競合と同じ案しか出ない」「アンケートは好評なのに売れない」「思い切った案を安く試したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“只能想出和竞品一样的方案”“问卷好评却卖不动”）也适用。

Analyze a set of design samples (HTML mockups + website URLs) and produce a structured style guide that anchors the rest of the stardust redesign pipeline. Use when the user supplies reference designs ("design samples", "mockups", "inspiration sites", "style references") and wants to extract a consistent visual language — type system, color palette, spacing, motion, and reusable component patterns — before redesigning a target site. Triggers on phrases like "distill these samples", "extract a style guide from these examples", "use these as design references", or "analyze these mockups". Outputs a `trait-matrix.json` (structured per-sample + cross-sample design tokens) and a `SAMPLES.md` narrative brief that `stardust:direct` reads under Mode B (anchor-reference precedence) when picking a redesign direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select, document, download, and checksum-verify the most appropriate NCBI reference genome on an HPC cluster. Use whenever an analysis needs a reference genome, genome FASTA, genome annotation, assembly accession, or genome index and no exact approved assembly is already available; when a user asks to fetch a species genome from NCBI; or when a pipeline must resolve and cache a reproducible reference assembly on a remote cluster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simple Preference Optimization for LLM alignment. Reference-free alternative to DPO with better performance (+6.4 points on AlpacaEval 2.0). No reference model needed, more efficient than DPO. Use for preference alignment when want simpler, faster training than DPO/PPO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates exhaustive technical references and API documentation. Generates comprehensive parameter listings, configuration guides, and searchable reference materials. Use PROACTIVELY for API docs, configuration references, or complete technical specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MCP設定を読み、承認後も取得するコードが変わり得るパッケージ参照を確認するスキル。サーバーを実行せず、npm・Python・Dockerの指定を分類します。

• MCP設定を承認前に確認したいとき
• latestタグや版の範囲指定の確認
• CIへの再現可能な設定チェックの追加

プロジェクト文書の整理依頼を適切な専門スキルへ振り分け、文書の役割、リンク、設計判断の索引、根拠への参照を、ファイルを変更せずに点検するスキルです。

• プロジェクト文書の整理手順を選びたいとき
• 既存文書の情報源を把握したいとき
• ローカルリンクと設計判断の索引の点検

参考映像から測定した色やカットのリズムを使い、生成動画と既存映像を編集・合成して、数値で照合した完成動画と再編集用のタイムラインを作るスキル。

• 参考映像のスタイルで動画を作りたいとき
• 既存映像に生成クリップを追加したいとき
• 映像素材や3D小物の合成

参考素材の見た目やカットのリズムを再利用できる設定に整理し、手元の映像の編集計画、画像・動画・3D素材の生成計画、編集可能なタイムラインをオフラインで作るスキル。

• 映像の好みを聞き取り設定にまとめたいとき
• スタイルパックの検証と出所確認
• 参考映像のリズムで編集を計画

Prepare for due diligence meetings — management presentations, expert network calls, customer references, and advisor sessions. Generates targeted question lists, benchmarks to reference, and red flags to probe. Use before any diligence meeting or call. Triggers on "prep for management meeting", "diligence call prep", "expert call questions", "customer reference questions", or "meeting prep for [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning with TRL - SFT for instruction tuning, DPO for preference alignment, PPO/GRPO for reward optimization, and reward model training. Use when need RLHF, align model with preferences, or train from human feedback. Works with HuggingFace Transformers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts. BOOTSTRAP MODE - Triggers: "Create a data context skill", "Set up data analysis for our warehouse", "Help me create a skill for our database", "Generate a data skill for [company]" → Discovers schemas, asks key questions, generates initial skill with reference files ITERATION MODE - Triggers: "Add context about [domain]", "The skill needs more info about [topic]", "Update the data skill with [metrics/tables/terminology]", "Improve the [domain] reference" → Loads existing skill, asks targeted questions, appends/updates reference files Use when data analysts want Claude to understand their company's specific data warehouse, terminology, metrics definitions, and common query patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning with TRL - SFT for instruction tuning, DPO for preference alignment, PPO/GRPO for reward optimization, and reward model training. Use when need RLHF, align model with preferences, or train from human feedback. Works with HuggingFace Transformers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt- and template-complete Google Docs creation and editing with explicit-instruction-authoritative structural preservation, including semantic roles, relationships, comparison dimensions, and instructed extensions; full-topology native-copy routing; source-grounded per-tab adaptation for past/example references; style-preserving hyperlink and table edits; canonical smart-chip-first authoring for dates and relevant supported people or Google resources; a file-backed advisory trusted read before existing-document writes; automatic protected-control awareness; direct connector APIs by default; DOCX-first import only when no supplied Google Doc template/reference constrains the output; and checked-in code mode only for exact native dropdown mutation. Use when Codex must create, edit, fill, adapt, redesign, or verify Google Docs without overriding explicit user/template instructions, adding unrequested document scope, or carrying stale reference facts into a new deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI frontend specialist and design consultant that guides users through a structured discovery process before generating any code. Collects visual references, design tokens, typography, icons, layout preferences, and brand guidelines to ensure the final output matches the user's vision with high fidelity. Use when the user asks to build, design, create, or improve any frontend interface — websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps, emails, forms, modals, or any UI element. Also triggers on "build me a UI", "design a page", "create a component", "improve this layout", "make this look better", "frontend", "interface", "redesign", or when the user provides mockups, screenshots, or design references. Do NOT use for backend logic, API design, database schemas, or non-visual code tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate multiple original brand campaign worlds from a supplied visual reference while controlling how close the new work feels without copying protected signature elements. Use when a user provides a brand identity image, poster, editorial campaign, moodboard, or generated concept and asks for inspired alternatives, several distinct brands in one visual family, a closer-to-reference V2, exact wordmarks inside images, or originality-safe image-generation prompts and outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify references in an academic paper: check whether each BibTeX entry is real, whether in-text citations match the cited paper's actual content, and produce a structured verification report. Use when user says "验证参考文献", "ref verify", "check references", "核实引用", "引用是否正确", or wants to audit citations in a LaTeX manuscript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。