「restructure」の検索結果

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on "make this listenable," "convert for audio," "optimize for reading aloud," "prepare for TTS," "make an audio version," "podcast script," "read this aloud." Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," or "website planning." NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate Infrahub docs feature pages from the legacy topic+guide pair into a cleaner structure (single merged page, hub+spokes, or tutorial extraction). Supports both single-feature migrations (one feature like Profiles or Webhooks) and section-wide migrations (a whole section like Branches & Change Control with multiple features migrated together) when the team has agreed on a section-wide restructure plan. Trigger when the user names a specific feature or section to migrate (e.g. "let's migrate profiles", "start the Resource Manager migration", "do the entire Branches & Change Control section"). Each migration is its own branch off `demo/groups-diataxis-example`, its own PR back to that branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, restructure, and diagnose IEEE-style technical manuscript sections using a routed static/dynamic workflow. Use for IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine papers when writing titles, abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, contribution statements, section outlines, or Chinese-to-English engineering paper drafts in AI, computer science, communications, control, signal processing, electrical/electronic engineering, power, robotics, circuits, and applied systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create, review, or restructure a fundraising pitch deck for seed or Series A. Also activates when the user mentions "deck", "pitch", "investor presentation", or "slide structure".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and restructures technical documentation - READMEs, tutorials, how-to guides, user guides, architecture docs, onboarding guides, runbooks and SOPs, troubleshooting guides, release notes, and knowledge base articles - grounded in the actual code or product, with commands and examples verified where possible. Use when the user asks to document a project, feature, system, or process, write or fix a README, explain a codebase to new developers, turn notes into a guide, or make existing docs clearer. For endpoint-by-endpoint API reference or OpenAPI specs, use api-documentation-writer; for CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files, use claude-md-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when organizing or verifying a modular Spring Boot monolith with Spring Modulith, including module APIs, dependency rules and reliable module events. Do not restructure an application into modules for an unrelated endpoint change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing organizational structure (team topologies, Conway's Law alignment), mapping stakeholders by power-interest for change initiatives, defining team interface contracts (APIs, SLAs, decision rights, handoffs), assessing capability maturity (DORA, CMMC, agile maturity models), planning org restructures (functional to product teams, platform teams, shared services), or when user mentions "org design", "team structure", "stakeholder map", "team interfaces", "capability maturity", "Conway's Law", or "RACI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure and improve Isabelle or Coq proofs to enhance readability, modularity, and maintainability without changing semantics. Use when proofs are long and monolithic, have repeated patterns, use unclear naming, lack documentation, or when the user asks to refactor, clean up, improve, or reorganize their formal proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reorganizes markdown documents into well-structured, consistent format while preserving content and improving readability. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Fix heading hierarchy issues (skipped levels, multiple h1s), (2) Generate or update table of contents, (3) Standardize formatting (lists, code blocks, emphasis, links), (4) Improve grammar and spelling, (5) Add missing standard sections (installation, usage, etc.), (6) Remove redundant or duplicate content, (7) Restructure technical docs, READMEs, or long-form content for better organization and flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn whatever the agent just produced — a conversation, an analysis, an artifact, a markdown file — into a live shareable URL in seconds, published as-is via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "share this", "give me a link", "put this online", "make this a page", "send this to someone". This is the fast, verbatim path — for a restructured, designed report use report-publisher; for a view-tracked proposal use proposal-tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right layer', 'simplify this code', or 'improve this structure'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure and optimize alert rules for monitoring platforms (Sentry, PagerDuty, Datadog, OpsGenie). Use when someone asks to "reduce alert noise", "fix alert fatigue", "create alert rules", "set up escalation policies", "tune alerting thresholds", or "create on-call runbooks". Generates platform-specific alert configurations and tiered escalation policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。