「roadmaps」の検索結果

Linear project management - issues, projects, cycles, and roadmaps. Use for Linear-related tasks like managing issues, tracking sprints, and organizing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multi-agent Claude Code teams with Minoan-Semitic naming — auto-discover project context (CLAUDE.md, roadmaps, plans, issues) and generate named team configurations with structured task lists and file ownership. Triggers on parallel workstreams, agent teams, multi-agent, spawn agents, swarm, minoan-swarm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold editorial documentation sites with the Vellum design system — OKLCH palette, Bodoni Moda / Source Serif 4 / Inconsolata typography, warm or dark space theme, 35 semantic components (state cards, parity matrices, entity dossiers, stat stacks, utterance blocks, editorial notes, entity flows, fact blocks, sub-navigation, source lists, debugger panels, ring visualizations, phase timelines, glossaries, subject-intro, stat-bar, hero-image with lightbox, gallery/masonry grid, audio player with Web Audio API). Static HTML, zero build step. Use when building competitive intelligence pages, personal archives, internal documentation, roadmaps, or multi-page static sites that need a designed, non-generic aesthetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create, edit, rebuild, or refine editable diagrams in `.drawio` / diagrams.net format, especially for academic figures such as system architecture diagrams, technical roadmaps, workflow diagrams, method pipelines, module relationship diagrams, and experiment flowcharts. Use this skill when the user wants publication-ready outputs with both an editable source file and a PNG export, or when an existing figure image needs to be rebuilt into a clean editable academic-style diagram.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cybersecurity partner skill for acting as a practical security collaborator across architecture review, threat modeling, secure design, risk prioritization, defensive planning, vulnerability remediation, incident readiness, security roadmaps, and technical decision support. Use when the user wants an ongoing security advisor, reviewer, or second set of eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 用户想根据论文、科研文档、研究文本、图注、开题/答辩材料或具备读图条件的参考图生成可复制的 AI 科研绘图提示词；触发场景包括论文配图、科研绘图、图形摘要、Graphical Abstract、机制图、技术路线图、实验装置图、模型架构图、多面板对比图、汇报总览图、参考图风格迁移、未知领域母版生成，或上传/引用 PDF、Word、LaTeX、Markdown、摘要、方法段、图注、课题说明、研究方案、参考图片。Also use when the user asks for scientific figure prompts, research illustration prompts, graphical abstract prompts, mechanism diagrams, technical roadmaps, experimental setup diagrams, model architecture diagrams, multi-panel scientific figures, paper/conference figures, or AI image prompts based on papers, research documents, abstracts, methods sections, figure captions, proposals, reference images, PDFs, Word docs, LaTeX files, Markdown files, or research plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured U.S. legal audit summaries that distill compliance findings into executive-ready risk prioritization and remediation plans, covering likelihood/impact scoring, consequence analysis, and corrective actions with timelines and owners. Use for legal audits, compliance audits, regulatory audits, compliance gap analyses, risk assessments, audit report summaries, or remediation roadmaps. Trigger keywords: audit summary, compliance findings, audit report, risk prioritization, remediation plan, regulatory exposure, corrective action plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides continuous improvement and change management for SMEs adopting AI. Applies Marginal Gains philosophy, Kaizen principles, and structured sprint methodologies to organizational transformation. Use when user asks about change management, continuous improvement, AI adoption strategy, team resistance, transformation roadmaps, or improvement sprints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring or rewriting a roadmap in agents/roadmaps/ — phases, goal, acceptance criteria, council notes; fires even on 'write a plan for X' / 'draft a roadmap'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase as a read-only senior advisor, prioritize evidence-backed improvements, and write self-contained implementation plans. Use for codebase audits, improvement roadmaps, focused planning, plan review, plan reconciliation, or executing an existing improve plan through an isolated Codex worktree. The advisor never edits source code; execution uses codex-improve and returns to the main agent for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. bu skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF using Implementation Tiers to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use quando o usuário perguntar o estado da integração com o GitHub — 'status do github', 'qual project está configurado', 'o que já foi publicado' — gh, scopes, repo, Project e roadmaps publicados. Somente leitura.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。