「subagents」の検索結果

Generate an explorable HTML report of Claude Code session usage (tokens, cache, subagents, skills, expensive prompts) from ~/.claude/projects transcripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with *.excalidraw or *.excalidraw.json files, user mentions diagrams/flowcharts, or requests architecture visualization - delegates all Excalidraw operations to subagents to prevent context exhaustion from verbose JSON (single files: 4k-22k tokens, can exceed read limits)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified Minions skill for both deterministic shell jobs and LLM subagent orchestration. Replaces the older `gbrain-jobs` routing intent. Use when: submitting gbrain jobs, shell/background tasks, spawning subagents, checking progress, steering running work, pausing/resuming, parallel fan-out. One durable, observable, steerable queue interface. Also carries the durable-execution doctrine for any operation expected to exceed ~2 minutes: capability ladder, deadman checks that verify the result was reported, and content-addressed stage checkpoints for expensive pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build durable backend AI agents with the eve framework. Use when creating, editing, or debugging an eve project — agent instructions, skills, tools, connections, channels, sandboxes, subagents, schedules, or evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a new Kortix user through their first session: set expectations about what Kortix is, turn a vague ask into a strong first prompt, deliver one real result, then surface deeper capabilities (connectors, memory, triggers, subagents, marketplace) and plant a retention hook. Use when the user is new, asks 'what can you do / how does this work / where do I start', sends a vague or exploratory first message, or has no prior history in this project. Do NOT use when they arrive with a specific, well-formed task — just do it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives cmux as an agent cockpit to boot, race, and monitor visible agent teams. Mac-only. USE WHEN cmux, agent cockpit, boot an agent team, orchestrate agents, three-tier orchestration, agent race, needle-in-haystack hotfix, agent fleet, 2x2 fleet, watch/monitor my agents, scale compute to scale impact, send a prompt to a running agent, multiplexer, terminal cockpit, orchestrator lead worker. NOT FOR one-shot in-harness subagents with no terminal to watch (use Agent/Workflow), the Pulse dashboard itself (cmux feeds it, use Pulse), browser deploy-verification (use Interceptor), or Linux/Windows (cmux is Mac-only — use tmux).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a trivial task inline — no subagents, no planning overhead

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine bug patterns from any git repository. Discovers bug-fix commits via git log heuristics, analyzes each in parallel with subagents, writes individual analysis files, and synthesizes a generalized PATTERNS.md with repo-specific details stripped. Invoke explicitly with /bug-archaeology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static source-code vulnerability scan. Reads a target directory (and THREAT_MODEL.md if present), spawns parallel review subagents per focus area, and writes VULN-FINDINGS.json + .md for /triage to consume. Read-only — no building, running, or network. For execution-verified crashes, use vuln-pipeline instead. Use when asked to "scan for vulns", "review this code for security issues", "find bugs in <dir>", or as the step between /threat-model and /triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages a repository's open GitHub issues and pull requests via the gh CLI. Optionally reviews and merges ready PRs — incrementally merging passing automated/bot PRs and maintainer-approved ones, and spawning review subagents for never-reviewed ones — then closes already-resolved issues with comments citing the resolving PR or commit, cross-links issues with their pending fix PRs, and assigns local-only priority and change-size estimates for everything outstanding. Use when triaging, grooming, or reviewing a repository's open issues and PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route broad or ambiguous life-sciences research requests to the right skills, normalize core entities, optionally parallelize independent evidence gathering with subagents when available, and synthesize a concise evidence-backed answer. Use when a user asks a general life-sciences question that could span multiple sources or analysis types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a task and must decide WHO does it — yourself, a spawned subagent, or another agent in the topology that already holds the context. The rule: how much would a blank slate have to read in to do this correctly? A lot → route to a context-holding agent; a little → subagent; unsure → a real agent or yourself. NOT the mechanics of fanning out (that's dispatching-parallel-agents / subagent-driven-development) — this is the who/whether decision, and the failure mode that makes teams abandon subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for designing and building high-quality skills from scratch through structured conversation. Use when someone wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, or asks for help making Agents do something consistently. Also use when someone says "turn this into a skill", "I want to automate this workflow", "how do I teach my Agent to do X", or mentions creating SKILL.md files. Covers standalone skills and MCP-enhanced workflows. Do NOT use for creating subagents (use subagent-creator) or technical design documents (use create-technical-design-doc).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a prompt-agnostic execution and verification loop to any substantial task while preserving the original request. Use when the user asks to fan out work, use subagents or independent reviewers, loop until done, benchmark against references, apply a harsh critic, compare candidates blind, improve an existing prompt with verification, or continue until explicit quality gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot Kode permission prompts/denials (tool allowlists, commandAllowedTools, dontAsk fail-closed, subagent inheritance). Use when tools are unexpectedly blocked, permission prompts repeat, or behavior differs between main agent and subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate focused coding, research, review, or verification work to a bounded DevSpace subagent. Use when a task benefits from separate context, a specialist perspective, or a follow-up with the same worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use parallel subagents for large-scale paper screening and deep dive analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the same orchestration as `/efficient-fable` to any high-cost frontier model: delegate research, coding, and testing to cheaper subagents while keeping planning, synthesis, and final review with the expensive model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。