「scoring」の検索結果

Generate competitive SEO content briefs with per-section word counts, competitor scoring, keyword density guidance, and page-type templates. Supports both new page briefs and improve-existing-page briefs. Use when user says "content brief", "write a brief", "content outline", "blog brief", "service page brief", "brief for", "writing brief", "content plan", or "outline for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI Overviews (formerly SGE), ChatGPT web search, Perplexity, and other AI-powered search experiences. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) analysis including brand mention signals, AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt compliance, passage-level citability scoring, and platform-specific optimization. Use when user says "AI Overviews", "SGE", "GEO", "AI search", "LLM optimization", "Perplexity", "AI citations", "ChatGPT search", or "AI visibility".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates creative, research-backed domain name ideas and checks availability with competitor analysis, pattern recognition, and quality scoring. Use when brainstorming brandable domains for a product or project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive review sessions with academic PDFs (lectures, research papers, book chapters). Extract concepts, run Q&A sessions, generate quizzes with scoring. Preserves mathematical formulas in LaTeX format. Privacy-preserving local processing - PDFs never uploaded. Use when studying academic materials, reviewing research, or preparing for exams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instinct-based learning system that observes sessions via hooks, creates atomic instincts with confidence scoring, and evolves them into skills/commands/agents. v2.1 adds project-scoped instincts to prevent cross-project contamination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Product Owner skill for requirements gathering, analysis, and PRD generation. Triggers when users request product requirements, feature specification, PRD creation, or need help understanding and documenting project requirements. Uses quality scoring and iterative dialogue to ensure comprehensive requirements before generating professional PRD documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Workforce Orchestration: Hybrid Human+AI Teams. Build agent-led workforce orchestration: capability matching, escrow-based payments for AI agents and human gig workers, unified reputation scoring, SLA enforcement, dispute resolution, and compliance reporting. Includes detailed Python code examples for every pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify an inbound lead — "is this lead worth my time", "qualify this lead", "should I take this client". Applies MEDDIC and SPIN scoring and returns a verdict with reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-healing stability monitor for AI agents - 5 core checks + 15 extended checks, auto-recovery, health scoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise-grade security vetting protocol for AI agent skills. Automated threat detection, quantified risk scoring, and zero-trust code analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trust scoring, agent discovery, profiling, wallet/identity lookup, contact, dispatch, and metadata reads/writes via 8K4 Protocol (ERC-8004). Use when checking whether an on-chain agent is trustworthy, finding agents for a task, viewing an agent card/profile, fetching validations or wallet/identity records, contacting agents, or reading/updating hosted metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect, benchmark, and monitor Web3 RPC endpoints — latency checks, method support, chain detection, and health scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects prompt injection attacks targeting LLM-based applications using a multi-layered defense combining regex pattern matching for known attack signatures, heuristic scoring for structural anomalies, and transformer-based classification with DeBERTa models. The detector analyzes user inputs before they reach the LLM, flagging direct injections (system prompt overrides, role-play escapes, instruction hijacking) and indirect injections (encoded payloads, multi-language obfuscation, delimiter-based escapes). Based on the OWASP LLM Top 10 (LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection) and Simon Willison's prompt injection taxonomy. Activates for requests involving prompt injection detection, LLM input sanitization, AI security scanning, or prompt attack classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds automated threat intelligence feed integration pipelines connecting STIX/TAXII feeds, open-source threat intel, and commercial TI platforms into SIEM and security tools for real-time IOC matching and alerting. Use when SOC teams need to operationalize threat intelligence by automating feed ingestion, normalization, scoring, and distribution to detection systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build investor-ready pitch scripts in multiple formats (10-min, 5-min, 2-min, 1-min elevator, investor email). Produces pitch narratives, Q&A preparation, pitch scoring rubric, and optional investor roleplay practice. Use when the user wants to create a pitch, prepare for investor meetings, craft a startup pitch, write a fundraising narrative, or practice their pitch. Triggers for "pitch deck", "investor pitch", "pitch my startup", "fundraising deck", "seed deck", "how to pitch", "investor meeting", "demo day", "prepare pitch", "pitch script", "elevator pitch for investors", "pitch practice", "practice my pitch", "investor roleplay", or any request to present a startup to investors, accelerators, or partners. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed, but leverages its output if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds repeatable evaluation systems with golden datasets, scoring rubrics, pass/fail thresholds, and regression reports. Use for "LLM evaluation", "testing AI systems", "quality assurance", or "model benchmarking".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use 'could potentially' — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。