「cost optimization」の検索結果

Optimize existing Azure resources and analyze Reservations or Savings Plans. WHEN: "optimize Azure costs", "reduce cloud spending", "rightsize resources", "find idle resources", "orphaned disk", "deleted VM still charged", "public IP still charging", "reservation utilization", "Savings Plan coverage", "commitment recommendation", "why is pay-as-you-go still charged". DO NOT USE FOR: cost spikes, forecasts, pricing estimates, budgets, or governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce LLM API and infrastructure costs through model selection, prompt caching, batching, caching, quantization, and self-hosting strategies. Track spend by team and model, set budgets, and implement cost-aware routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supply Chain Bottleneck Analyzer for Shopify/DTC stores. Diagnose cash flow, inventory, shipping costs, and customer acquisition efficiency. Includes CAC/LTV analysis, 3PL cost optimization, and ad spend benchmarks. No API key required for basic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce warehouse and inventory optimization advisor. Analyzes inventory health, calculates safety stock and reorder points, performs ABC analysis, evaluates fulfillment costs, and provides actionable recommendations for improving efficiency. Supports all major fulfillment models: Self-fulfillment, Amazon FBA/FBM, Walmart WFS, 3PL, Shopify Fulfillment, TikTok Shop, Dropshipping, and Hybrid setups. No API key required. Use when: (1) reducing stockouts or overstock, (2) calculating safety stock levels, (3) optimizing warehouse costs, (4) improving Amazon IPI score, (5) analyzing inventory KPIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest concrete optimizations for Claude Code usage based on historical session data. Covers cost reduction, speed improvement, error prevention, and workflow efficiency. Use for data-driven optimization planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Kubernetes costs through resource right-sizing, unused resource detection, and cluster efficiency analysis. Use for cost optimization, resource analysis, and capacity planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Form optimization for lead capture, contact, demo request, application, and checkout forms. Covers field-cost analysis, multi-step form design, validation UX, mobile optimization, and A/B testing frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Impact Reporting development including troubleshooting, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when wiring Impact Reporting to Monitor alerts, Logic Apps, Service Health, HPC Guest Health, or diagnostic logs, and other Azure Impact Reporting related development tasks. Not for Azure Carbon Optimization (use azure-carbon-optimization), Cost Management (use azure-cost-management), Azure Monitor (use azure-monitor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Amazon profit analysis and revenue optimization. Revenue waterfall analysis, hidden fee identification, ACoS impact assessment, return cost calculation, and profitability optimization strategies. Use when the user asks about Amazon profit analysis, profitability calculation, fee analysis, margin optimization, or revenue breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS cost optimization, monitoring, and operational excellence expert. Use when analyzing AWS bills, estimating costs, setting up CloudWatch alarms, querying logs, auditing CloudTrail activity, or assessing security posture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement comprehensive observability for LLM applications including tracing (Langfuse/Helicone), cost tracking, token optimization, RAG evaluation metrics (RAGAS), hallucination detection, and production monitoring. Essential for debugging, optimizing costs, and ensuring AI output quality. Use when ", llm-monitoring, tracing, langfuse, helicone, cost-tracking, ragas, evaluation, hallucination-detection, prompt-caching" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review system costs and propose reductions. Use when a senior developer needs cost-saving recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Trigger.dev tasks, schedules, and runs for cost optimization opportunities. Use when asked to reduce spend, optimize costs, audit usage, right-size machines, or review task efficiency. Combines static source analysis with live run analysis via the Trigger.dev MCP tools (list_runs, get_run_details, get_current_worker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when the task involves `improve SEO`, `optimize for search`, `fix meta tags`, `add structured data`, `sitemap optimization`, or `search engine optimization`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Separate expensive observation from cheap decision-making in autonomous agent loops using a two-clock architecture. A fast clock accumulates data into a digest file; a slow clock reads the digest and acts only when something is pending. Idle cycles cost nothing because the action clock returns immediately after reading an empty digest. Use when building autonomous agents that must observe continuously but can only afford to act occasionally, when API or LLM costs dominate and most cycles have nothing to do, when designing cron-based agent architectures with observation and action phases, or when an existing heartbeat loop is too expensive because it calls the LLM on every tick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage AI costs with usage tracking and optimization. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cost-management related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or reliability smells. Use when the user asks "review my Forge app", "pre-deploy check", "is this app ready to ship", "review manifest", "general app review", "release readiness", or asks for a broad quality pass. Do not use for deep security audits/SAST/exploitability review, cost optimization, or diagnosing a known broken app; route those to forge-security-review, forge-cost-optimizer, or forge-debugger respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes infrastructure costs at 1K-100K user scales by reading the actual codebase, auto-detecting cloud providers, modeling per-action costs, and projecting total monthly spend with optimization recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides AWS cost optimization, monitoring, and operational best practices with integrated MCP servers for billing analysis, cost estimation, observability, and security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。