191 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Improve existing code without changing behavior: scan smells, simplify, dedupe, reuse utilities, and verify after edits. Use for refactor, cleanup, simplify, reduce duplication, extract method, dead code, or code smells. No PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects common LLM coding agent artifacts in codebases. Identifies test quality issues, dead code, over-abstraction, and verbose LLM style patterns. Use when cleaning up AI-generated code or reviewing for agent-introduced cruft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for in-memory Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) code knowledge graphs, real-time symbol dependency mapping, refactoring blast radius calculation, and dead code eradication / Panduan ahli graf pengetahuan AST kode in-memory, pemetaan dependensi simbol real-time, kalkulasi radius dampak refaktor, dan pembersihan kode mati.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asking whether something in imp is actually finished - hunting stubs, placeholders, request fields that are parsed and then ignored, code paths or kernels that never run, gate-based features that silently no-op, tests that assert nothing. Triggers on "is this implemented", "unfinished", "stub", "placeholder", "dead path", "does this flag do anything", "accepted but ignored", "kernel never launched", "test asserts nothing", "neutral A/B on a gated feature". Do NOT use for structural debt / god files / duplication (codebase-audit) or for who-calls-what (code-graph).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compiler-level code intelligence via native LSP — definitions, references, types, call hierarchies, and diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplify working code while preserving behavior—remove dead paths, flatten nesting, clarify names, reduce duplication. Use after features work but code feels over-engineered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a focused tech debt reduction sprint — inventories all technical debt (TODOs, outdated deps, missing tests, god objects), fixes code smells, removes dead code, then hardens with a review pass. Use when a codebase feels sluggish, before a major feature push, or on a regular maintenance cadence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks unreachable code, unused imports/variables/functions, commented-out code, backward compatibility shims, deprecated patterns. Returns findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform comprehensive technical reviews of Ruby on Rails applications. Runs automated analysis tools (RubyCritic, Brakeman, bundler-audit, Gitleaks, Debride, linters, SimpleCov, Rails stats, Rails ERD), analyzes code for architecture, security, authorization (Pundit/CanCanCan), dead code, and design issues, and produces a structured markdown report with prioritized findings and a 0-10 score. Use when the user requests a tech review, code audit, project assessment, or quality analysis of a Rails application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route codebase-structure questions (who calls X, where used, change-impact) to an existing code-graph first: impact, tests-for, dead cheaper, never more precise; grep routine. Also 'call graph'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor code to remove dead code, useless comments, unused variables, and unused imports. Use when asked to declutter a class, clean up noisy code, remove cruft, or run `/refactor:declutter`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solidityの自動マーケットメーカーや流動性プールを対象に、再入攻撃、価格操作、交換時の価格ずれ、管理者権限などを点検し、安全な実装例を参照するスキル。
Evaluates and negotiates job offers. Decodes base, bonus, equity, sign-on, level and terms with unknowns kept unknown and each offer in its own currency, benchmarks against checkable pay data, finds true leverage, drafts one counter as email and call script, role-plays the recruiter, and handles the salary-expectations number, deadlines and extensions, "best and final", competing offers, counteroffers and written acceptance or decline. Country-aware (India CTC, 13th-month pay, public-sector scales). Use when the user says "I got an offer of...", "is this offer good", "should I negotiate", "how do I counter", "compare my offers", "what is my equity worth", "they asked my salary expectations", "they want an answer by Friday", "can I ask for more time", "should I accept" or "practice the negotiation call". Uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. For logging the offer, its deadline and withdrawal notes, job-application-manager; for other interview answers, interview-prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every consumer is named before anything is deleted. Not for tidying a diff you just wrote (that is bundled `/simplify`) and not for defects (that is `/review`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GDPR and German DSGVO compliance automation. Scans codebases for privacy risks, generates DPIA documentation, tracks data subject rights requests with Art. 12(3) one-month deadlines. Use when running GDPR compliance assessments, privacy audits, data protection planning, DPIA generation, or data subject rights (DSAR) management (e.g., 'check this service for GDPR risks', 'track an access request deadline'). Final compliance determinations route to the DPO or legal counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Deadline Funnel tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a game, engine or modding technique on the open web with archive-aware, rate-limit-safe searches — Wayback Machine/archive.today for dead forums (XeNTaX, Zenhax, old threads), GitHub code/repo search, Nexus/Steam Workshop/Thunderstore APIs, Reddit JSON, YouTube transcripts, plus archive snapshots as evidence. Use when starting work on a game ("how did people mod X before?"), when a documented tool/link is dead, when forum threads are login-gated (semi-auto handoff to the human), and before writing a field note so claims carry source URLs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to run a holistic regrounding pass on the entire microsoft/apm documentation corpus against current source code, page-by-page, and emit surgical fixes for stale claims. Activate when the maintainer wants a WHOLE-CORPUS audit (not per-PR review) -- typical triggers include "audit the docs", "reground the corpus", "check every page against code", "pre-release docs sweep", "the docs have drifted everywhere", or "we just reshaped the TOC, find dead links". Wave-batched and S7-verified; scales to the full ~112-page corpus in ~10 minutes wall-time. This is a SIBLING to docs-sync, not a replacement: docs-sync is per-PR (triggered by a diff); this skill is per-corpus (triggered by a maintainer ask). They share agent personas, schemas, and the docs index, but their triggers MUST NOT collide. Does NOT auto-merge, does NOT push without maintainer review, and does NOT replace per-PR drift detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, races, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production debugging. Start here for any 'something is wrong' situation. Not for interpreting profiles or benchmarking (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` skill), applying optimization patterns (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance` skill), or designing new code (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety` skill for defensive coding, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency` skill for concurrency design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。